Advertisement

Soft Computing

, Volume 22, Issue 16, pp 5363–5375 | Cite as

Evaluation research on commercial bank counterparty credit risk management based on new intuitionistic fuzzy method

  • Qian Liu
  • Chong Wu
  • Lingyan Lou
Focus
  • 198 Downloads

Abstract

Over the past few years, the world economy is still in a profound adjustment stage after financial crisis, and it will continue to maintain a “New Mediocre” situation. It is clear that multiple risk factors, such as the issue of Brexit and European refugees, will increase the uncertainty of world economy growth. Under such economic development condition, it is obvious that the development of commercial bank will face a challenge; especially, the development of off-balance sheet business has received more attention from the commercial bank. Therefore, the counterparty credit risk has been brought into focus by the government and regulatory authority. This paper employs the new intuitionistic fuzzy method to improve the score function, and it aims to establish an evaluation mechanism of commercial bank counterparty credit risk management. By selecting the representative Chinese commercial banks, this paper conducts an empirical analysis to verify the validity of the evaluation system and make certain effectiveness evaluation.

Keywords

Intuitionistic fuzzy method Counterparty credit risk Evaluation system 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by four foundations; they are National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 16BJL037), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71771066), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71532004) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. LBH-Q14096)

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal participants

Research is not involved with human participants and/or animals.

References

  1. Atanassov KT, Rangasamy P (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(1):87–96CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Ba S, Zeng Z, Zhu Y (2014) Measurement of counterparty credit risk and its prevention. Finance Econ 05:8–14Google Scholar
  3. Calvo T, Mayor G, Mesiar R (2002) Aggregation operators: new trends and applications. J Syst Eng 1304(4):1–13zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen D, Yang Y, Hui W (2011) Granular computing based on fuzzy similarity relations. Soft Comput 15(6):1161–1172CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Chiclana F (2001) Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a multipurpose decision-making model based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 122(2):277–291MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. China Banking Regulatory Committee (2012) Rues for regulating capital of commercial banks: trial implementation. China Financial Publishing House, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  7. Fan ZP, Chen FD, Xiao Z (2012) Method for hybrid multiple attribute decision making based on cumulative prospect theory. J Syst Eng 27(27)Google Scholar
  8. Feng YS, Huang GS (2006) Entropy of vague set. J Chin Comput Syst 27(11):2115–2119Google Scholar
  9. Githaiga JW (2015) Effects of credit risk management on the financial performance of commercial banks in Kenya. Master Bus Adm Univ Nairobi 8:91–105Google Scholar
  10. Gregory J (2010) Counterparty credit risk: the new challenge for global financial markets. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Harsanyi JC (1955) Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. J Polit Econ 63(4):309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hong DH, Choi CH (2000) Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114(1):103–113CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Jr MJ (2014) Supervisory requirements and expectations for portfolio level counterparty credit risk measurement and management. J Financ Regul Compliance 22(3):252–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li X, Zhou JD, Zhao XD (2016) Travel itinerary problem. Transp Res Part B 91:332–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu HW, Wang GJ (2007) Multi-criteria decision-making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Eur J Oper Res 179(1):220–233CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Nyamutowa C, Masunda S (2013) An analysis of credit risk management practices in commercial banking institutions in Zimbabwe. Int J Econ Res 04(01):97–112Google Scholar
  17. Ouamar D (2013) How to implement counterparty credit risk requirements under Basel III: the challenges. J Risk Manag Financ Inst 5:72–93Google Scholar
  18. Perera WTD (2015) The effect of credit risk management on financial performance of commercial banks in Sri Lanka. Master Bus Adm 13:125–140Google Scholar
  19. Process AH (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. Wiley, New York, pp 19–28Google Scholar
  20. Research group of financial stability sector in Hefei center sub-branch of People’s bank of China. Zhang Yan, Wang Liang (2012) Reform of counterparty credit risk management and enlightenment. Review of financial development (01):63–67Google Scholar
  21. Wang J, Zhang J, Liu SY (2006) A new score function for fuzzy MCDM based on vague set theory. Int J Comput Cognit 12:113–131Google Scholar
  22. Xu ZS (2004) Uncertainty multi-attribute decision making method and application. Tsinghua University Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  23. Xu Z (2007) Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15(6):1179–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Xu Z (2008a) Intuitionistic fuzzy information integration theory and application. Science Press, MarrickvilleGoogle Scholar
  25. Xu Z (2008b) Linguistic aggregation operators: an overview. Stud Fuzziness Soft Comput 220:163–181CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Xu ZS, Da QL (2010a) The ordered weighted geometric averaging operators. Int J Intell Syst 17(7):709–716CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Xu ZS, Da QL (2010b) An overview of operators for aggregating information. Int J Intell Syst 18(9):953–969CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Xu Z, Yager RR (2006) Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int J Gen Syst 35(4):417–433MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Xu X, Zhang W, Li N et al (2015) A bi-level programming model of resource matching for collaborative logistics network in supply uncertainty environment. J Frankl Inst 352:3873–3884MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Xu XF, Hao J, Deng YR, Wang Y (2017) Design optimization of resource combination for collaborative logistics network under uncertainty. Appl Soft Comput 56:684–691.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.07.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yager RR (1988) On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking. Read Fuzzy Sets Intell Syst 18(1):183–190MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Yager RR, Kacprzyk J (1997) The ordered weighted averaging operators. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 16:32–64zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Yan LC, Ying C (2010) Discussion on risk management of commercial bank. In: IEEE international conference on information & financial engineering, pp 770–773Google Scholar
  34. Yuan Y, Guan T, Yan XB (2014) Supplier selection decision model based on VIKOR method. Control Decis 3:551–560Google Scholar
  35. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang X, Fan ZP (2012) Risk type of hybrid multiple attribute decision method based on prospect theory 06:772–781Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina
  2. 2.School of FinanceHarbin University of CommerceHarbinChina
  3. 3.School of Economics and ManagementHarbin Engineering UniversityHarbinChina

Personalised recommendations