Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Supporting consumer’s purchase decision: a method for ranking products based on online multi-attribute product ratings

  • Focus
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Online product ratings, as a type of electronic word-of-mouth, play an important role for helping consumers select desirable products, but it is difficult for consumers to read a large number of online ratings on e-commerce Web site. To support consumer’s purchase decision, how to rank the candidate products based on online product ratings and consumer’s preferences is a noteworthy research topic, while the existing studies concerning this issue are still relatively scarce. This paper proposes a method for ranking products based on online multi-attribute product ratings. In the method, a discrete percentage distribution of the evaluation of each candidate product with respect to each attribute based on online ratings is first constructed, and the \(3\sigma \) criterion is used to eliminate the anomalous ratings. Then, by defining of the stochastic dominance rules and the stochastic dominance degrees on comparing two discrete percentage distributions, the stochastic dominance relation between each pair of products is determined, and the corresponding stochastic dominance degree is calculated. Further, according to the obtained stochastic dominance degrees, the ranking of candidate products can be determined using the PROMETHEE-II method. A case study on selecting the automobile is given to illustrate the use of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brans J, Vincke P (1985) A preference ranking organisation method: the PROMETHEE method for MCDM. Manag Sci 31(6):647–656

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen K, Kou G, Shang J, Chen Y (2015) Visualizing market structure through online product reviews: integrate topic modeling, TOPSIS, and multi-dimensional scaling approaches. Electron Commer Res Appl 14(1):58–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekking FM (2005) A modern introduction to probability and statistics: understanding why and how. Springer Science & Business Media, London

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ducange P, Pecori R, Mezzina P (2017) A glimpse on big data analytics in the framework of marketing strategies. Soft Comput 21(3):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Engler TH, Winter P, Schulz M (2015) Understanding online product ratings: a customer satisfaction model. J Retail Consum Serv 27:113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan ZP, Zhang X, Liu Y, Zhang Y (2013) A method for stochastic multiple attribute decision making based on concepts of ideal and anti-ideal points. Appl Math Comput 219(24):11438–11450

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fisz M (1963) Probability theory and mathematical statistics. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier B, Rupin N, Bigerelle M, Najjar D, Iost A (2006) Application of the generalized lambda distributions in a statistical process control methodology. J Process Control 16(10):1087–1098

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hu N, Koh NS, Reddy SK (2014) Ratings lead you to the product, reviews help you clinch it? the mediating role of online review sentiments on product sales. Decis Support Syst 57:42–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kangale A, Kumar SK, Naeem MA, Williams M, Tiwari MK (2015) Mining consumer reviews to generate ratings of different product attributes while producing feature-based review-summary. Int J Syst Sci 47:1–15

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kolli S, Parsaei HR (1992) Multi-criteria analysis in the evaluation of advanced manufacturing technology using PROMETHEE. Comput Ind Eng 23(1–4):455–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy H (1992) Stochastic dominance and expected utility: survey and analysis. Manag Sci 38(4):555–593

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Lo HK (2014) An energy-efficient scheduling and speed control approach for metro rail operations. Transp Res Part B 64:73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Bhowmick SS, Sun A (2011) AffRank: affinityc—driven ranking of products in online social rating networks. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 62(7):1345–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Wu C, Luo P (2014) Rating online commodities by considering consumers’ purchasing networks. Manag Decis 52(10):2002–2020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Shah S, Jiang W (2004) On-line outlier detection and data cleaning. Comput Chem Eng 28(9):1635–1647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Fan ZP, Zhang X (2016) A method for large group decision-making based on evaluation information provided by participators from multiple groups. Inf Fusion 29:132–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Bi JW, Fan ZP (2017) Ranking products through online reviews: a method based on sentiment analysis technique and intuitionistic fuzzy set theory. Inf Fusion 36:149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majd E, Balakrishnan V (2016) A trust model for recommender agent systems. Soft Comput 20(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh HK, Kim SW, Park S, Zhou M (2015) Can you trust online ratings? a mutual reinforcement model for trustworthy online rating systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cyber Syst 45(12):1564–1576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng J, Peng S, Hu Y (2012) Partial least squares and random sample consensus in outlier detection. Anal Chim Acta 719:24–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytical hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, Toronto

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Savage D, Zhang X, Yu X, Chou P, Wang Q (2015) Detection of opinion spam based on anomalous rating deviation. Expert Syst Appl 42(22):8650–8657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun M (2012) How does the variance of product ratings matter? Manag Sci 58(4):696–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu SL (2010) The error analysis and data processing. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu XF, Hao J, Deng YR, Wang Y (2017) Design optimization of resource combination for collaborative logistics network under uncertainty. Appl Soft Comput 56:684–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Yang G, Wu J (2016) Integrating rich and heterogeneous information to design a ranking system for multiple products. Decis Support Syst 84:117–133

  • Zha ZJ, Yu J, Tang J, Wang M, Chua TS (2014) Product aspect ranking and its applications. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 26(5):1211–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Guo X, Chen G (2015) Prediction uncertainty in collaborative filtering: enhancing personalized online product ranking. Decis Support Syst 83:10–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the National Science Foundation of China (Project Nos. 71571039, 71771043 and 71371002), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, NEU, China (Project No. N140607001), and the 111 Project (B16009).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Management and Decision Sciences, School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110167, China

    Zhi-Ping Fan, Yang Xi & Yang Liu

  2. State Key Laboratory of Synthetical Automation for Process Industries, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110819, China

    Zhi-Ping Fan

Authors
  1. Zhi-Ping Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yang Xi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Communicated by X. Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fan, ZP., Xi, Y. & Liu, Y. Supporting consumer’s purchase decision: a method for ranking products based on online multi-attribute product ratings. Soft Comput 22, 5247–5261 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2961-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2961-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation