Advertisement

Soft Computing

, Volume 22, Issue 9, pp 2867–2879 | Cite as

Doubly fed induction generator (DFIG) wind turbine controlled by artificial organic networks

  • Pedro Ponce
  • Hiram Ponce
  • Arturo Molina
Methodologies and Application

Abstract

The main goal of this paper is to show the control capabilities of artificial organic networks when they are applied to variable speed wind generators. Since doubly fed induction generator (DFIG) is one of the most important variable wind generators, it requires to include advanced controllers which allow to improve its performance during operation. On the other hand, the artificial organic controllers (AOC) are intelligent controllers based on ensembles of fuzzy inference systems and artificial hydrocarbon networks. To understand AOC, this paper introduces the fundamentals of artificial hydrocarbon networks, describes the fuzzy-molecular inference ensemble, and discusses artificial organic controllers when they are deployed in variable speed wind generators. Additionally, DFIG wind turbine model is completely derived in order to test the AOC. A conventional proportional–integral–derivative (PID) controller is compared with the proposed PID-based AOC (PID-AOC) for wind generators under linear and nonlinear wind profiles. Five parameters were used for evaluation: pitch angle, stator power, rotor power, generator’s speed and power coefficient. Results showed the superior control performance in wind generators when artificial organic networks are implemented. Particularly, the PID-AOC response obtained higher values of rotor and stator powers, small pitch angle response meaning less energy consumption, high power coefficient values, and smooth starting phase minimizing risks of damage in the DFIG. The proposed PID-AOC can be applied in DFIG to minimize the undesired fluctuation on the electric grid, to reduce the mechanical stress in the blades preventing mechanical damages and to perform good sensitivity when noise in the wind is included.

Keywords

Artificial organic networks Intelligent control systems Wind turbine Engineering control systems Fuzzy controllers 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors, Pedro Ponce and Arturo Molina, would like to thank the support from Grant No. 266632 “Bi-National Laboratory on Smart Sustainable Energy Management and Technology Training” from CONACYT.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bianchi F, Battista H, Mantz R (2007) Wind turbine control systems: principles. Modelling and gain scheduling design, advances in industrial control. Springer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biswas A, Gupta R (2009) An artificial neural network based methodology for the prediction of power and torque coefficients of a two bladed airfoil shaped H-rotor. Open Renew Energy J 2:43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deng W, Chen R, He B, Liu Y, Yin L, Guo J (2012) A novel two-stage hybrid swarm intelligence optimization algorithm and application. Soft Comput 16(10):1707–1722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dida A, Benattous D (2016) A complete modeling and simulation of DFIG based wind turbine system using fuzzy logic control. Front Energy 10(2):143–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ebrahimkhani S (2016) Robust fractional order sliding model control of doubly-fed induction generator (DFIG)-based wind turbines. ISA Trans 63:343–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ekanayake J, Holdsworth L, Wu X, Jenkins N (2003) Dynamic modeling of doubly fed induction generator wind turbines. IEEE Trans Power Syst 18(2):803–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fu Z, Ren J, Shu J, Sun X, Huang F (2016) Enabling personalized search over encrypted outsourced data with efficiency improvement. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 27(9):2546–2559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gagnon R, Sybille G, Bernard S, Pare D, Casoria S, Larose C (2005) Modeling and real-time simulation of a doubly-fed induction generator driven by a wind turbine. In: International conference on power systems transients. Montreal, Canada, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  9. Goudarzi N, Zhu W (2013) A review on the development of wind turbine generators across the world. Int J Dyn Control 1(2):192–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gu B, Sheng VS, Tay KY, Romano W, Li S (2015) Incremental support vector learning for ordinal regression. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 26(7):1403–1416MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gu B, Sheng VS (2016) A robust regularization path algorithm for v-support vector classification. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 1–8. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2527796
  12. Gu B, Sun X, Sheng VS (2016) Structural minimax probability machine. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 1–11. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2544779
  13. Hafiz F, Abdennour A (2016) An adaptive neuro-fuzzy inertia controller for variable-speed wind turbines. Renew Energy 92:136–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hodzic M, Tai LC (2016) Grey predictor reference model for assisting particle swarm optimization for wind turbine control. Renew Energy 86:251–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holdsworth L, Wu X, Ekanayake J, Jenkins N (2003) Comparison of fixed speed and doubly-fed induction wind turbines during power system disturbances. IEE Proc Gener Transm Distrib IET 150:343–352Google Scholar
  16. Karimi-Davijani H, Sheikholeslami A, Livani H, Karimi-Davijani M (2009) Fuzzy logic control of doubly-fed induction generator wind turbine. World Appl Sci J 6(4):499–508Google Scholar
  17. Li S, Wang H, Tian Y, Aitouch A, Klein J (2016) Direct power control og DFIG wind turbine systems based on an intelligent proportional-integral sliding model control. ISA Trans 64:431–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Molina A, Ponce H, Ponce P, Tello G, Ramírez M (2014) Artificial hydrocarbon networks fuzzy inference systems for CNC machines position controller. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 72(9–12):1465–1479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Munteanu I, Bratcu A, Cutululis NA, Ceanga E (2008) Optimal control of wind energy systems. Springer, Advances in Industrial ControlGoogle Scholar
  20. Ogata K (2002) Modern control engineering. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Pan Z, Zhang Y, Kwong S (2015) Efficient motion and disparity estimation optimization for low complexity multiview video coding. IEEE Trans Broadcast 61(2):166–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ponce P (2015) Wind generator model. Report, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico City, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  23. Ponce H, Ponce P (2011) Artificial organic networks. In: Electronics, robotics and automotive mechanics conference (CERMA), 2011 IEEE. IEEE, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico, pp 29–34Google Scholar
  24. Ponce P, Ramirez-Figueroa F (2010) Intelligent control systems with LabVIEW. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ponce H, Ponce P, Molina A (2013) Artificial hydrocarbon networks fuzzy inference system. Math Probl Eng 2013:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ponce H, Ibarra L, Ponce P, Molina A (2014a) A novel artificial hydrocarbon networks based space vector pulse width modulation controller for induction motors. Am J Appl Sci 11(5):789–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ponce H, Ponce P, Molina A (2014b) Adaptive noise filtering based on artificial hydrocarbon networks: an application to audio signals. Expert Syst Appl 41(14):6512–6523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ponce H, Ponce P, Molina A (2014c) Artificial organic networks: artificial intelligence based on carbon networks, studies in computational intelligence, vol 521. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ponce H, Martinez-Villaseñor L, Miralles-Pechuan L (2015a) Comparative analysis of artificial hydrocarbon networks and data-driven approaches for human activity recognition, lecture notes in computer science, vol 9454. Springer, chap 15:150–161Google Scholar
  30. Ponce H, Ponce P, Molina A (2015b) The development of an artificial organic networks toolkit for LabVIEW. J Comput Chem 36(7):478–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ponce H, Ponce P, Molina A (2015c) A novel robust liquid level controller for coupled-tanks systems using artificial hydrocarbon networks. Expert Syst Appl 42(22):8858–8867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ponce H, Moya-Albor E, Brieva J (2016) A novel artificial organic controller with hermite optical flow feedback for mobile robot navigation. InTech, chap 6:145–169Google Scholar
  33. Qian D, Tong S, Liu H, Liu X (2016) Load frequency control by neural-network-based integral sliding mode for nonlinear power systems with wind turbines. Neurocomputing 173:875–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rubio J (2014) Analytic neural network model of a wind turbine. Soft Comput 19(12):3455–3463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wen X, Shao L, Xue Y, Fang W (2015) A rapid learning method for vehicle classification. Inf Sci 295:395–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xia Z, Wang X, Sun X, Liu Q, Xiong N (2016) Steganalysis of LSB matching using differences between nonadjacent pixels. Multimed Tools Appl 75(4):1947–1962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yuhui Z, Jeon B, Danhua X, Wu QMJ, Hui Z (2015) Image segmentation by generalized hierarchical fuzzy c-means algorithm. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 28(2):961–973Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tecnologico de MonterreyMexico CityMexico
  2. 2.Facultad de IngenieríaUniversidad PanamericanaMexico CityMexico

Personalised recommendations