Soft Computing

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 823–837 | Cite as

Combining a continuous location model and Heuristic techniques to determine oilfield warehouse locations under future oil well location uncertainty

  • Haixiang Guo
  • Wenwen Pan
  • Xiao Liu
  • Yijing Li
  • Bo Zeng
Methodologies and Application


A rational decision regarding warehouse location can save logistics costs and improve oilfield operating efficiency. In existing research on oilfield warehouse location problems, it is usually assumed that the oil well locations are known. However, in real oilfield, operations, as well locations, are affected by underground reservoir conditions and the long-term plans of the oilfield company; future well locations that might be serviced by a warehouse are highly uncertain. In addition, previous warehouse location research has tended to solve location problems using a discrete or continuous location model without considering delivery problems. With these deficits in mind, this paper applies a Monte Carlo simulation to simulate future well locations, then selects several suitable candidates using a continuous location model and finally uses discrete location optimization to determine the optimal solution while also considering the distribution interruption problem. Finally, an oil warehouse location problem in the south of the Ordos Basin in China is given as an example of the process. Using relevant data such as number of wells, well locations and materials quantities required, Zhengning is identified as the optimal location for the storage warehouse construction. The simulation indicated that RMB 55,000 would be saved every year, proving the strength of the model to save logistics costs. In an environment in which well locations are uncertain, the combination of a continuous location model and a discrete location model can significantly enhance warehouse location logistics decisions in the oil and gas industries.


Oilfield Warehouse location Monte Carlo simulation Centroid method Uncertain well locations 



This research has been supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 71103163, 71573237; New Century Excellent Talents in University of China under Grant No. NCET-13-1012; Research Foundation of Humanities and Social Sciences of Ministry of Education of China No. 15YJA630019; Special Funding for Basic Scientific Research of Chinese Central University under Grant Nos. CUG120111, CUG110411, G2012002A, CUG140604, CUG160605; Open Foundation for the Research Center of Resource Environment Economics in China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) under Grant No. H2015004B.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Aikens CH (1985) Facility location models for distribution planning. Eur J Oper Res 22(3):263–279MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Ardjmand E, Young WA, Weckman GR et al (2016) Applying genetic algorithm to a new bi-objective stochastic model for transportation, location, and allocation of hazardous materials. Expert Syst Appl 51:49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brahimi N, Khan SA (2014) Warehouse location with production, inventory, and distribution decisions: a case study in the lube oil industry. 4OR 12(2):175–197MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Brest J, Maučec MS (2008) Population size reduction for the differential evolution algorithm. Appl Intell 29(3):228–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Camponogara E, de Castro MP, Plucenio A et al (2011) Compressor scheduling in oil fields. Optim Eng 12(1–2):153–174MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen DQ, Cai C, Li SK (1987) The research of crude oil gathering system planning. Optim Manag Sci 3:1–8Google Scholar
  7. Chou CC (2010) An integrated quantitative and qualitative FMCDM model for location choices. Soft Comput 14(7):757–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dai WQ, Li SM (2014) Online median location problem analysis in Euclidean plane. J Manag Sci China 17(9):88–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gabli M, Jaara EM, Mermri EB (2016) A possibilistic approach to UMTS base-station location problem. Soft Comput 20(7):2565–2575Google Scholar
  10. Guha S, Khuller S (1999) Greedy strikes back: improved facility location algorithms. J Algorithms 31(1):228–248MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Hermeto NSS, Ferreira Filho VJM, Bahiense L (2014) Logistics network planning for offshore air transport of oil rig crews. Comput Indust Eng 75:41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jia H, Ordóñez F, Dessouky M (2007) A modeling framework for facility location of medical services for large-scale emergencies. IIE Trans 39(1):41–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Liang QS, Wang XF, Liang WW (2014) Geochemical characteristics and oil-source correlation of the mesozoic crude oils in the Southern Ordos Basin. Geol J China Univ 20(2):309–316Google Scholar
  14. Lu Z, Bostel N (2007) A facility location model for logistics systems including reverse flows: the case of remanufacturing activities. Comput Oper Res 34(2):299–323MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Luo YX, Zhang ZJ (2014) Layout optimization model of surface gathering system in oilfield. Gas Storage Transp 33(9):1004–1009Google Scholar
  16. Min H, Jayaraman V, Srivastava R (1998) Combined location-routing problems: a synthesis and future research directions. Eur J Oper Res 108(1):1–15CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Mokhtarian MN (2011) A new fuzzy weighted average (FWA) method based on left and right scores: an application for determining a suitable location for a gas oil station. Comput Math Appl 61(10):3136–3145MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Owen SH, Daskin MS (1998) Strategic facility location: a review. Eur J Oper Res 111(3):423–447CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Paul JA, MacDonald L (2016) Location and capacity allocations decisions to mitigate the impacts of unexpected disasters. Eur J Oper Res 251(1):252–263MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Sahebi H, Nickel S (2014) Offshore oil network design with transportation alternatives. Eur J Indust Eng 8(6):739–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Soleimani H, Kannan G (2015) A hybrid particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm for closed-loop supply chain network design in large-scale networks. Appl Math Model 39(14):3990–4012MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tao L, Tao YQ (2014) Uncertain prediction of energy supply based on Monte Carlo algorithm. J Chongqing Univ Technol (Soc Sci) 28(6):35–39Google Scholar
  23. Verma M, Gendreau M, Laporte G (2013) Optimal location and capability of oil-spill response facilities for the south coast of Newfoundland. Omega 41(5):856–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang F, Xu Y, Li YX (2006) Review on facility location models. Oper Res Manag Sci 15(5):64–69Google Scholar
  25. Wang Z, Hu XP, Wang XP (2013) Disruption management model and algorithm for distribution vehicle scheduling problems under accidental travel time delay. Syst Eng Theory Practice 33((2)):378–387MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. Weber A (1929) Theory of the location of industries. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  27. Wei L, Jiang H, Liu Y (2009) Hybrid genetic-simulated annealing algorithm of location–allocation optimization of looped gathering and transportation pipe network. In: Fifth international conference on natural computation, 2009 (ICNC’09), vol 4. IEEE, pp 275–280Google Scholar
  28. Wu QM, Xu Q (2009) Bi-levle optimization model for oil depot location decision. Oper Res Manag Sci 18(3):37–40MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. Yu G, Qi X (2004) Disruption management: framework, models and applications. World Scientific Publishing Company Incorporated, SingaporeCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Zou TF, Cai M, Liu JK (2013) Method for analyzing uncertainty of simulation results in accident reconstruction. J Syst Simul 5:009Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Haixiang Guo
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Wenwen Pan
    • 1
  • Xiao Liu
    • 1
  • Yijing Li
    • 1
  • Bo Zeng
    • 4
  1. 1.College of Economics and ManagementChina University of GeosciencesWuhanChina
  2. 2.Research Center for Digital Business ManagementChina University of GeosciencesWuhanChina
  3. 3.Mineral Resource Strategy and Policy Research Center of China University of GeosciencesWuhanChina
  4. 4.Department of Industrial EngineeringUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations