Soft Computing

, Volume 21, Issue 21, pp 6253–6267 | Cite as

A hybrid model of single valued neutrosophic sets and rough sets: single valued neutrosophic rough set model

  • Hai-Long Yang
  • Chun-Ling Zhang
  • Zhi-Lian Guo
  • Yan-Ling Liu
  • Xiuwu Liao
Foundations

Abstract

Smarandache initiated neutrosophic sets (NSs) as a tool for handling undetermined information. Wang et al. proposed single valued neutrosophic sets (SVNSs) that is an especial NSs and can be used expediently to deal with real-world problems. In this paper, we propose single valued neutrosophic rough sets by combining single valued neutrosophic sets and rough sets. We study the hybrid model by constructive and axiomatic approaches. Firstly, by using the constructive approach, we propose the lower/upper single valued neutrosophic approximation operators and illustrate the connections between special single valued neutrosophic relations (SVNRs) and the lower/upper single valued neutrosophic approximation operators. Then, by using the axiomatic approach, we discuss the operator-oriented axiomatic characterizations of single valued neutrosophic rough sets. We obtain that different axiom sets of the lower/upper single valued neutrosophic set-theoretic operators guarantee the existence of different classes of SVNRs which produce the same operators. Finally, we introduce single valued neutrosophic rough sets on two-universes and an algorithm of decision making based on single valued neutrosophic rough sets on two-universes, and use an illustrative example to demonstrate the application of the proposed model.

Keywords

Neutrosophic sets Single valued neutrosophic sets Single valued neutrosophic rough sets Constructive approaches Axiomatic approaches 

References

  1. Atanassov K (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(1):87–96MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Broumi S, Smarandache F (2014) Rough neutrosophic sets. Ital J Pure Appl Math 32:493–502MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Broumi S, Smarandache F, Single valued neutrosophic information systems based on rough set theory, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280742564
  4. Bonikowski Z, Bryniarski E, Wybraniec-Skardowska U (1998) Extensions and intentions in the rough set theory. Inf Sci 107:149–167MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Cornelis C, Cock MD, Kerre EE (2003) Intuitionistic fuzzy rough sets: at the crossroads of imperfect knowledge. Expert Syst Appl 20:260–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dubois D, Prade H (1990) Rough fuzzy sets and fuzzy rough sets. Int J Gen Syst 17:191–209CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Guo Y, Cheng HD (2009) A new neutrosophic approach to image segmentation. Pattern Recogn 42:587–595CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Guo Y, Sengur A (2015) NCM: neutrosophic c-means clustering algorithm. Pattern Recogn 48(8):2710–2724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Majumdar P, Samant SK (2014) On similarity and entropy of neutrosophic sets. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 26(3):1245–1252MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Mi JS, Zhang WX (2004) An axiomatic characterization of a fuzzy generalized of rough sets. Inf Sci 160:235–249CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. Int J Comput Inform Sci 11:341–356CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Pawlak Z (1991) Rough sets: theoretical aspects of reasoning about data. Kluwer Academic, DordrechtCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Pei DW (2005) A generalized model of fuzzy rough sets. Int J Gen Syst 34:603–613MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Peng JJ, Wang JQ, Zhang HY, Chen XH (2014) An outranking approach for multi-criteria decision-making problems with simplified neutrosophic sets. Appl Soft Comput 25:336–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rivieccio U (2008) Neutrosophic logics: prospects and problems. Fuzzy Sets Syst 159:1860–1868MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Salama AA, Broumi S (2014) Roughness of neutrosophic sets. Elixir Appl Math 74:26833–26837Google Scholar
  17. Şahin R, Küçük A (2015) Subsethood measure for single valued neutrosophic sets. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 29(2):525–530CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Smarandache F (1998) Neutrosophy. Neutrosophic probability, set, and logic. American Research Press, RehobothMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Smarandache F (1999) A unifying field in logics. Neutrosophy: neutrosophic probability, set and logic. American Research Press, RehobothMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang H, Smarandache F, Zhang YQ, Sunderraman R (2010) Single valued neutrosophic sets. Multispace Multistruct 4:410–413MATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Wu WZ, Mi JS, Zhang WX (2003) Generalized fuzzy rough sets. Inf Sci 151:263–282MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Wu WZ, Xu YH, Shao MW, Wang G (2016) Axiomatic characterizations of \((S, T)\)-fuzzy rough approximation operators. Inf Sci 334–335:17–43Google Scholar
  23. Yang XB, Song XN, Qi YS, Yang JY (2014) Constructive and axiomatic approaches to hesitant fuzzy rough set. Soft Comput 18:1067–1077CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Yang H-L, Guo Z-L, She YH, Liao XW (2016) On single valued neutrosophic relations. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 30:1045–1056CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Yang H-L, Li S-G, Guo Z-L, Ma C-H (2012) Transformation of bipolar fuzzy rough set models. Knowl Based Syst 27:60–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yang H-L, Li S-G, Wang SY, Wang J (2012) Bipolar fuzzy rough set model on two different universes and its application. Knowl Based Syst 35:94–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yao YY (2015) The two sides of the theory of rough sets. Knowl Based Syst 80:67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yao YY (1998) Constructive and algebraic methods of the theory of rough sets. Inf Sci 109:21–47MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Yao YY (1998) On generalizing pawlak approximation operators. LNAI 1424:298–307MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Ye J (2013) Multicriteria decision-making method using the correlation coefficient under single-valued neutrosophic environment. Int J Gen Syst 42(4):386–394MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Ye J (2014) Improved correlation coefficients of single valued neutrosophic sets and interval neutrosophic sets for multiple attribute decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 27:2453–2462MATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Ye J (2014) A multicriteria decision-making method using aggregation operators for simplified neutrosophic sets. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 26(5):2459–2466MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Yeung DS, Chen DG, Tsang ECC, Lee JWT, Wang XZ (2005) On the generalization of fuzzy rough sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 13:343–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhang XH, Zhou B, Li P (2012) A general frame for intuitionistic fuzzy rough sets. Inf Sci 216:34–49MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhang ZM (2013) On characterization of generalized interval type-2 fuzzy rough sets. Inf Sci 219:124–150MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang HD, Shu L, Liao SL (2016) On interval-valued hesitant fuzzy rough approximation operators. Soft Comput 20(1):189–209CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhou L, Wu WZ (2008) On generalized intuitionistic fuzzy approximation operators. Inf Sci 178:2448–2465MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhou NL, Hu BQ (2016) Axiomatic approaches to rough approximation operators on complete completely distributive lattices. Inf Sci 348(20):227–242MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhu W, Wang FY (2007) On three types of covering-based rough sets. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 19(8):1131–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hai-Long Yang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Chun-Ling Zhang
    • 1
  • Zhi-Lian Guo
    • 3
  • Yan-Ling Liu
    • 1
  • Xiuwu Liao
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Mathematics and Information ScienceShaanxi Normal UniversityXi’anPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of ManagementXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.College of EconomicsNorthwest University of Political Science and LawXi’anPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations