Advertisement

Soft Computing

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 523–540 | Cite as

Granular description of data in a non-stationary environment

  • Rami Al-Hmouz
  • Witold Pedrycz
  • Abdullah Saeed Balamash
  • Ali Morfeq
Methodologies and Application

Abstract

When developing models of non-stationary data, it becomes imperative to endow them with some meaningful update mechanisms, viz to provide with sufficient capabilities to accommodate changing characteristics of the environment. These mechanisms make the models of data evolvable. In the study, we introduce and discuss a class of evolvable models of data with the main objective to describe and interpret the incoming data. We advocate that information granularity and ensuing information granules are central to the characterization and interpretation of the dynamics and variability of numeric data. The relevance of information granules describing the data is evaluated in their abilities to construct the associated Takagi–Sugeno rule-based models. It is shown how the condition part of the rules formed by information granules changes when exposed to data of varying characteristics. Along with the structural facet of evolvability discussed is its parametric manifestation present in terms of the changes (updates) of the parameters of the local models standing in the conclusion part of the rules. The continuity of the evolving information granules (being crucial to their interpretability) is assured by running the clustering scheme initialized on the basis of the previously formed clusters (conditions of the rules) rather than starting FCM from some random configuration. We introduce some graph-oriented visualization means to provide a concise insight into the dynamics of information granules. As an interesting alternative, we introduce a granular fuzzy model where the added granularity of the parameters of a stationary fuzzy model is considered as a way to compensate for the non-stationary of the described system. A series of experiments is reported on with intent to demonstrate the performance of the model, analyze mechanisms of evolution of information granules, and deliver some useful comparative analysis.

Keywords

Non-stationary environment Evolvable rule-based models Concept drift Structure evolution Granular fuzzy model Granular Computing Data description and interpretation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, under Grant no. (8-135-36-RG). The authors, therefore, acknowledge with thanks DSR technical and financial support.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

We certify that there is no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.

References

  1. Angelov P, Filev D (2005) Simplets: a simplified method for learning evolving Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy models. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on fuzzy systems. pp 1068–1073Google Scholar
  2. Angelov P, Zhou X (2008) Evolving fuzzy rule-based classifiers from data streams. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 16(6):1462–1475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bezdek J, Ehrlich R, Full W (1984) FCM: the fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. Comput Geosci 10(2):191–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiu SL (1994) Fuzzy model identification based on cluster estimation. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 2:267–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cordón O (2011) A historical review of evolutionary learning methods for Mamdani-type fuzzy rule-based systems: designing interpretable genetic fuzzy systems. Int J Approx Reason 52(6):894–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ghazali M, Ibrahim Z, Suid M, Saealal M, Tumari M (2016) Single input fuzzy logic controller for flexible joint manipulator. Int J Innov Comput Inf Control 12(1):181–191Google Scholar
  7. Havens TC, Bezdek JC, Leckie C (2012) Fuzzy c-means algorithms for very large data. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20(6):1130–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lee CC (1990) Fuzzy logic in control systems: fuzzy logic controller. II. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 20(2):419–435MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Li F, Shi P, Wu L, Zhang X (2016) Fuzzy-model-based-stability and nonfragile control for discrete-time descriptor systems with multiple delays. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22(4):1019–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lugli A, Neto E, Henriques J, Daniela M, Hervas A, Santos M, Justo J (2016) Industrial application control with fuzzy systems. Int J Innov Comput Inf Control 12(2):665–676Google Scholar
  11. Mandal S, Jayaram B (2015) SISO fuzzy relational inference systems based on fuzzy implications are universal approximators. Fuzzy Sets Syst 277:1–21MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Márquez FA, Peregrín A, Herrera F (2007) Cooperative evolutionary learning of linguistic fuzzy rules and parametric aggregation connectors for Mamdani fuzzy systems. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15(6):1162–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Štepnicka M, Burda M, Štepnicková L (2015) Fuzzy rule base ensemble generated from data by linguistic associations mining. Fuzzy Sets Syst 285:140–161MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wang D, Zeng XJ, Keane JA (2013) A simplified structure evolving method for Mamdani fuzzy system identification and its application to high-dimensional problems. Inf Sci 220:110–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rami Al-Hmouz
    • 1
  • Witold Pedrycz
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Abdullah Saeed Balamash
    • 1
  • Ali Morfeq
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringKing Abdulaziz UniversityJeddahSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  3. 3.Polish Academy of SciencesWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations