Skip to main content
Log in

Spectral–spatial multi-feature-based deep learning for hyperspectral remote sensing image classification

  • Methodologies and Application
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hyperspectral remote sensing has a strong ability in information expression, so it provides better support for classification. The methods proposed to deal the hyperspectral data classification problems were build one by one. However, most of them committed to spectral feature extraction that means wasting some valuable information and poor classification results. Thus, we should pay more attention to multi-features. And on the other hand, due to extreme requirements for classification accuracy, we should hierarchically explore more deep features. The first thought is machine learning, but the traditional machine learning classifiers, like the support vector machine, are not friendly to larger inputs and features. This paper introduces a hybrid of principle component analysis (PCA), guided filtering, deep learning architecture into hyperspectral data classification. In detail, as a mature dimension reduction architecture, PCA is capable of reducing the redundancy of hyperspectral information. In addition, guided filtering provides a passage to spatial-dominated information concisely and effectively. According to the stacked autoencoders which is a efficient deep learning architecture, deep-level multi-features are not in mystery. Two public data set PaviaU and Salinas are used to test the proposed algorithm. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed spectral–spatial hyperspectral image classification method can show competitive performance. Multi-feature learning based on deep learning exhibits a great potential on the classification of hyperspectral images. When the number of samples is 30 % and the iteration number is over 1000, the accuracy rates for both of the two data set are over 99 %.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azar AT, Hassanien AE (2015) Dimensionality reduction of medical big data using neural-fuzzy classifier. Soft Comput 19(4):1115–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baassou B, He M, Mei S (2013) An accurate SVM-based classification approach for hyperspectral image classification. In: 21st International conference on geoinformatics, geoinformatics 2013, Kaifeng, China, June 20–22, 2013, pp 1–7

  • Bengio Y, Lamblin P, Popovici D, Larochelle H (2007) Greedy layer-wise training of deep networks. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 19:153

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang C-C, Lin C-J (2011) LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM TIST 2(3):27

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Lin Z, Zhao X, Wang G, Yanfeng G (2014) Deep learning-based classification of hyperspectral data. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 7(6):2094–2107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Zhao X, Jia X (2015) Spectral–spatial classification of hyperspectral data based on deep belief network. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 8(6):2381–2392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falco N, Benediktsson JA, Bruzzone L (2014) A study on the effectiveness of different independent component analysis algorithms for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 7(6):2183–2199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fauvel M, Benediktsson JA, Chanussot J, Sveinsson JR (2008) Spectral and spatial classification of hyperspectral data using SVMs and morphological profiles. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 46(11):3804–3814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He K, Sun J, Tang X (2013) Guided image filtering. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 35(6):1397–1409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang X, Zhang L (2013) An SVM ensemble approach combining spectral, structural, and semantic features for the classification of high-resolution remotely sensed imagery. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 51(1):257–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang X, Li S, Benediktsson JA (2014) Spectral–spatial hyperspectral image classification with edge-preserving filtering. IEEE T Geosci Remote Sens 52(5):2666–2677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ko L-W, Kuo B-C, Lin C-T (2005) An optimal nonparametric weighted system for hyperspectral data classification. In: Proceedings of the knowledge-based intelligent information and engineering systems, 9th international conference, KES 2005, Melbourne, Australia, September 14–16, 2005, Part I, pp 866–872

  • Li J, Bioucas-Dias JM, Plaza A (2013) Spectral–spatial classification of hyperspectral data using loopy belief propagation and active learning. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 51(2):844–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Bruzzone L, Liu S (2015) Deep feature representation for hyperspectral image classification. In: 2015 IEEE international geoscience and remote sensing symposium (IGARSS 2015), Milan, Italy, July 26–31, 2015, pp 4951–4954

  • Liu P, Sun S, Li G, Xie J, Zeng Y (2012) Unsupervised change detection on remote sensing images using non-local information and Markov random field models. In: 2012 IEEE international geoscience and remote sensing symposium (IGARSS). IEEE, pp 2245–2248

  • Lunga D, Prasad S, Crawford MM, Ersoy O (2014) Manifold-learning-based feature extraction for classification of hyperspectral data: a review of advances in manifold learning. IEEE Signal Process Mag 31(1):55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavrovouniotis M, Yang S (2015) Training neural networks with ant colony optimization algorithms for pattern classification. Soft Comput 19(6):1511–1522

  • Melgani F, Bruzzone L (2004) Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 42(8):1778–1790

  • Ouma YO, Tetuko J, Tateishi R (2008) Analysis of co-occurrence and discrete wavelet transform textures for differentiation of forest and non-forest vegetation in very-high-resolution optical-sensor imagery. Int J Remote Sens 29(12):3417–3456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson K (1901) On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philos Mag 2(11):559–572

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaresi M, Gerhardinger A, Kayitakire F (2008) A robust built-up area presence index by anisotropic rotation-invariant textural measure. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 1(3):180–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quesada-Barriuso P, Arguello F, Heras DB (2014) Spectral–spatial classification of hyperspectral images using wavelets and extended morphological profiles. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 7(4):1177–1185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards JA, Jia X (2013) Remote sensing digital image analysis: an introduction. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ, Hinton GE (1986) Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323:533–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun L, Wu Z, Liu J, Xiao L, Wei Z (2015) Supervised spectral–spatial hyperspectral image classification with weighted Markov random fields. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 53(3):1490–1503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan CC, Eswaran C (2008) Reconstruction of handwritten digit images using autoencoder neural networks. In: Canadian conference on electrical and computer engineering, 2008 (CCECE 2008), pp 000465-000470

  • Tarabalka Y, Benediktsson JA, Chanussot J, Tilton JC (2010) A multiple classifier approach for spectral–spatial classification of hyperspectral data. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international geoscience & remote sensing symposium (IGARSS 2010), July 25–30, 2010, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, pp 1410–1413

  • Vincent P, Larochelle H, Bengio Y, Manzagol P-A (2008) Extracting and composing robust features with denoising autoencoders. In: Proceedings of the 25th international conference on machine learning (ICML’08), pp 1096–1103

  • Wen J, Tian Z, Liu X, Lin W (2013) Neighborhood preserving orthogonal pnmf feature extraction for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 6(2):759–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia J, Du P, He X, Chanussot J (2014) Hyperspectral remote sensing image classification based on rotation forest. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 11(1):239–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan H, Tang YY (2016) Spectral–spatial shared linear regression for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Trans Cybern PP(99):1–12

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41471368 and 41571413).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peng Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Communicated by V. Loia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, L., Zhang, J., Liu, P. et al. Spectral–spatial multi-feature-based deep learning for hyperspectral remote sensing image classification. Soft Comput 21, 213–221 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-016-2246-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-016-2246-3

Keywords

Navigation