Advertisement

Soft Computing

, Volume 21, Issue 22, pp 6633–6640 | Cite as

Segmentation and enhancement of brain MR images using fuzzy clustering based on information theory

  • Mohamad Amin Bakhshali
Methodologies and Application

Abstract

In recent decades, fuzzy segmentation methods, FCM algorithm in particular, have been widely employed for medical image segmentation, because they can save more information of the original image. But some artifacts like spatial noise and bias in medical images disturb segmentation results. This research presents an improved and robust FCM method based on information theoretic clustering, which estimated and corrected the heterogeneity of the magnetic field image (bias) and minimized the noise effects. To increase accuracy against any noise, the mutual information between data distribution of each cluster and those out of that cluster were maximized. The simulation results of the proposed algorithm are compared with previous fuzzy segmentation methods and its superiority in terms of segmentation of MR images in the database of brain images and synthetic images is illustrated.

Keywords

FCM Bias Mutual information Segmentation Brain MR image 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

This study has not funding.

Conflicts of interest

Authors declare that this study has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Ahmed MN, Mohamed NA, Farag AA, Moriarty T (2002) A modified fuzzy c-means algorithm for bias field estimation and segmentation of MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 21:193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banerjee A, Maji P (2013) Rough sets for bias field correction in MR images using contra harmonic mean and quantitative index. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 32:2140–2151Google Scholar
  3. Blekas K, Likas A, Galatsanos NP, Lagaris IE (2005) A spatially constrained mixture model for image segmentation. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 16:494–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen SC, Zhang DQ (2004) Robust image segmentation using FCM with spatial constraints based on new kernel-induced distance measure. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 34:1907–1916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chuang K, Tzeng H, Chen S, Wu J, Chen T (2006) Fuzzy c-means clustering with spatial information for image segmentation. Comput Med Imaging Gr 30:9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gokcay E, Principe JC (2002) Information theoretic clustering. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 24:158–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Greenspan H, Ruf A, Goldberger J (2006) Constrained Gaussian mixture model framework for automatic segmentation of MR brain images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 25:1233–1245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ji ZX, Sun QS, Xia DS (2011) A modified possibilistic fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm for bias field estimation and segmentation of brain MR image. Comput Med Imaging Gr 35:383–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ji Z, Xia Y, Sun Q, Chen Q, Xia D, Feng DD (2012) Fuzzy local Gaussian mixture model for brain MR image segmentation. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 16:339–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ji Z, Liu J, Cao G, Sun Q, Chen Q (2014a) Robust spatially constrained fuzzy c-means algorithm for brain MR image segmentation. Pattern Recognit 47:2454–2466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ji Z, Xia Y, Sun Q, Chen Q, Feng D (2014b) Adaptive scale fuzzy local Gaussian mixture model for brain MR image segmentation. Neurocomputing 134:60–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Liao L, Lin T, Li B (2008) MRI brain image segmentation and bias field correction based on fast spatially constrained kernel clustering approach. Pattern Recognit Lett 29:1580–1588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Liew A, Yan H (2003) An adaptive spatial fuzzy clustering algorithm for 3-D MR image segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22:1063–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Permuter H, Francos J, Jermyn I (2006) A study of Gaussian mixture models of color and texture features for image classification and segmentation. Pattern Recognit 39:695–706CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Ramathilagama S, Pandiyarajan R, Sathya A, Devi R, Kannan SR (2011) Modified fuzzy c-means algorithm for segmentation of T1–T2-weighted brain MRI. J Comput Appl Math 235:1578–1586MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Wang ZM, Soh YC, Song Q, Sim K (2009) Adaptive spatial information-theoretic clustering for image segmentation. Pattern Recognit 42:2029–2044CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Wang ZM, Song Q, Soh YC, Sim K (2013) An adaptive spatial information-theoretic fuzzy clustering algorithm for image segmentation. Comput Vis Image Underst 117:1412–1420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Yang M, Tian Y (2015) Bias-correction fuzzy clustering algorithms. Inf Sci 309:138–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yang MS, Tsai HS (2008) A Gaussian kernel-based fuzzy c-means algorithm with a spatial bias correction. Pattern Recognit Lett 29:1713–1725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yasnoff WA, Mui JK, Bacus JW (1977) Error measures for scene segmentation. Pattern Recognit 9:217–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zeng J, Xie L, Liu Z (2008) Type-2 fuzzy Gaussian mixture. Pattern Recognit 41:3636–3643CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringFerdowsi University of MashhadMashhadIran

Personalised recommendations