Soft Computing

, Volume 21, Issue 18, pp 5413–5423 | Cite as

Model approach to grammatical evolution: deep-structured analyzing of model and representation

  • Pei He
  • Zelin Deng
  • Chongzhi Gao
  • Xiuni Wang
  • Jin Li
Methodologies and Application

Abstract

Grammatical evolution (GE) is a combination of genetic algorithm and context-free grammar, evolving programs for given problems by breeding candidate programs in the context of a grammar using genetic operations. As far as the representation is concerned, classical GE as well as most of its existing variants lacks awareness of both syntax and semantics, therefore having no potential for parallelism of various evaluation methods. To this end, we have proposed a novel approach called model-based grammatical evolution (MGE) in terms of grammar model (a finite state transition system) previously. It is proved, in the present paper, through theoretical analysis and experiments that semantic embedded syntax taking the form of regex (regular expression) over an alphabet of simple cycles and paths provides with potential for parallel evaluation of fitness, thereby making it possible for MGE to have a better performance in coping with more complex problems than most existing GEs.

Keywords

Genetic programming Grammatical evolution Finite state automaton Model 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

This study was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61170199, 61302061), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (Grant No. 2015A030313501), the Scientific Research Fund of Education Department of Hunan Province, China (Grant No. 11A004), Science and Technology Program of Hunan Province, China (Grant No. 2015SK20463), the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higer Education Institutions (PAPD), Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center on Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology (CICAEET), and the Open Fund of Guangxi Key Laboratory of Trusted Software (Guilin University of Electronic Technology) (Grant No. kx201208), Construction Project of Innovation Team in Universities in Guangdong Province, China (Grant No. 2015KCXTD014).

Conflicts of interest

Pei He declares that he has no conflict of interest. Zelin Deng declares that he has no conflict of interest. Chongzhi Gao declares that he has no conflict of interest. Xiuni Wang declares that she has no conflict of interest. Jin Li declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Aho AV, Lam MS, Sethi R, Ullman JD (2007) Compilers: principles, techniques, and tools, 2nd edn. Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle RiverMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Alfonseca M, Gil FJS (2013) Evolving an ecology of mathematical expressions with grammatical evolution. Biosystems 111(1):111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burbidge R, Wilson MS (2014) Vector-valued function estimation by grammatical evolution. Inform Sci 258(1):182–199CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Cano A, Ventura S, Krzysztof JC (2015) Multi-objective genetic programming for feature extraction and data visualization. Soft Comput. doi:10.1007/s00500-015-1907-y
  5. Castiglione A, Pizzolante R, De Santis A, Carpentieri B, Castiglione A, Palmieri F (2015) Cloud-based adaptive compression and secure management services for 3D healthcare data. Future Gener Comput Syst 43–44:120–134Google Scholar
  6. D’Apiec C, Nicola CD, Manzo V, Moccia R (2014) Optimal scheduling for aircraft departure. J Ambient Intell Hum Comput 5(1):799–807Google Scholar
  7. Dempsey I, ONeill M, Brabazon A (2006) Adaptive trading with grammatical evolution. In Proc. of 2006 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, vol 1, pp 2587–2592Google Scholar
  8. Dostal M (2013) Modularity in genetic programming. In: Zelinka I et al (eds) Handbook of optimization. ISRL, pp 38Google Scholar
  9. Du X, Ni YC, Xie DT, Yao X, Ye P, Xiao RL (2015) The time complexity analysis of a class of gene expression programming. Soft Comput 19(6):1611–1625CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Esposito C, Ficco M, Palmieri F, Castiglione A (2013) Interconnecting federated clouds by using publish-subscribe service. Clust Comput 16(4):887–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fernandez-Blanco E, Rivero D, Gestal M, Dorado J (2013) Classification of signals by means of genetic programming. Soft Comput 17(1):1929–1937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferreira C (2001) Gene expression programming: a new adaptive algorithm for solving problems. Complex Syst 13(2):87–129MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Fu W, Johnston M, Zhang M (2015) Genetic programming for edge detection: a gaussian-based approach. Soft Comput 20(3):1231–1248Google Scholar
  14. Gu B, Sheng VS, Tay KY, Romano W, Li S (2015) Incremental support vector learning for ordinal regression. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 26(7):1403–1416CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Harman M, Mansouri SA, Zhang Y (2012) Search-based software engineering: trends, techniques and applications. ACM Comput Surv 45(1):1–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. He P, Kang LS, Fu M (2008) Formality based genetic programming. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary ComputationGoogle Scholar
  17. He P, Kang LS, Johnson CG, Ying S (2011a) Hoare logic-based genetic programming. Sci China Inform Sci 54(3):623–637Google Scholar
  18. He P, Johnson CG, Wang HF (2011b) Modeling grammatical evolution by automaton. Sci China Inform Sci 54(12):2544–2553CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. He P, Deng ZL, Wang HF, Liu ZS (2015) Model approach to grammatical evolution: theory and case study. Soft Comput. doi:10.1007/s00500-015-1710-9
  20. Hopcroft JE, Motwani R, Ullman JD (2008) Automata theory, languages, and computation, 3rd edn. Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle RiverMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Hugosson J, Hemberg E, Brabazon A, O’Neill M (2010) Genotype representation in grammatical evolution. Appl Soft Comput 10(1):36–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kampouridis M, Otero FEB (2015) Heuristic procedures for improving the predictability of a genetic programming financial forecasting algorithm. Soft Comput. doi:10.1007/s00500-015-1614-8
  23. Koza JR (1992) Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection. MIT Press, CambridgeMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Krawiec K (2014) Genetic programming: where meaning emerges from program code. Genet Progr Evol Mach 15(1):75–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Langdon WB, Harman M (2015) Optimizing existing software with genetic programming. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 19(1):118–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li J, Wang Q, Wang C, Cao N, Ren K, Lou WJ (2010) Fuzzy keyword search over encrypted data in cloud computing. In: Proceeding of the 29th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM 2010), pp 441–445Google Scholar
  27. Li J, Huang XY, Li JW, Chen XF, Xiang Y (2014) Securely outsourcing attribute-based encryption with checkability. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 25(8):2201–2210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ma T, Zhou JJ, Tang M, Tian Y, AL-Dhelaan A, AL-Rodhaan M, Lee SY (2015) Social network and tag sources based augmenting collaborative recommender system. IEICE Trans Inform Syst E98–D(4):902–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mckay RI, Hoai NX, Whigham PA, Shan Y, ONeill M (2010) Grammar-based genetic programming: a survey. Genet Program Evol Mach 11(3/4):365–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mokryani G, Siano P, Piccolo A (2013) Optimal allocation of wind turbines in microgrids by using genetic algorithm. J Ambient Intell Hum Comput 4(1):613–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oltean M (2004) Solving even-parity problems using traceless genetic programming. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, vol 2.IEEE, pp 1813–1819Google Scholar
  32. Oltean M, Grosan C, Diosan L, Mihaila C (2009) Genetic programming with linear representation: a survey. Int J Artif Intell Tools 19(2):197–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Neill M, Ryan C (2001) Grammatical evolution. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 5(4):349–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. O’Neill M, Ryan C (2004) Grammatical evolution by grammatical evolution. In: Proceedings Of the 7th European Conference on genetic programming, vol 3003, LNCS, pp 138–149Google Scholar
  35. O’Neill M, Brabzaon A, Nicolau M, Mc Garraghy S, Keenan P (2004) \(\pi \) grammatical evolution. In: Proc. GECCO, vol 3103, LNCS, pp 617–629Google Scholar
  36. O’Neill M, Vanneschi L, Gustafson S, Banzhaf W (2010) Open issues in genetic programming. Genet Program Evol Mach 11(3):330–363Google Scholar
  37. Qian C, Yu Y, Zhou Z-H (2015) Variable solution structure can be helpful in evolutionary optimization. Sci China Inform Sci 58(1):1–17CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  38. Risco-Martin JL, Colmenar JM, Hidalgo JI (2014) A methodology to automatically optimize dynamic memory managers applying grammatical evolution. J Syst Softw 91(1):109–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ryan C, Collins J, O’Neill M (1998) Grammatical evolution: evolving programs for an arbitrary language. In: Proceedings of the first European Workshop on Genetic Programming, vol 1391, LNCS, pp 83–96Google Scholar
  40. Wen XZ, Shao L, Xue Y, Fang W (2015) A rapid learning algorithm for vehicle classification. Inform Sci 295(1):395–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wilson D, Kaur D (2009) Search, neutral evolution, and mapping in evolutionary computing: a case study of grammatical evolution. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 13(3):567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Xie SD, Wang YX (2014) Construction of tree network with limited delivery latency in homogeneous wireless sensor networks. Wirel Pers Commun 78(1):231–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zheng YH, Jeon BW, Xu DH, Wu QMJ, Zhang H (2015) Image segmentation by generalized hierarchical fuzzy c-means algorithm. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 28(2):961–973Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pei He
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Zelin Deng
    • 2
  • Chongzhi Gao
    • 1
  • Xiuni Wang
    • 1
  • Jin Li
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Computer Science and Educational SoftwareGuangzhou UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.School of Computer and Communication EngineeringChangsha University of Science and TechnologyChangshaChina
  3. 3.Guangxi Key Laboratory of Trusted SoftwareGuilin University of Electronic TechnologyGuilinChina
  4. 4.Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology (NUIST)NanjingChina

Personalised recommendations