Because of the existence of multiple sources of datasets, multi-view clustering has a wide range of applications in data mining and pattern recognition. Multi-view could utilize complementary information that existed in multiple views to improve the performance of clustering. Recently, there have been multi-view clustering methods which improved the performance of clustering to some extent. However, they do not take local representation relationship into consideration and local representation relationship is a crucial technology in subspace learning. To solve this problem, we proposed a novel multi-view clustering algorithm via robust local representation. We consider that all the views are derived from a robust unified subspace and noisy. To get the robust similarity matrix we simultaneously take all the local reconstruction relationships into consideration and use L1-norm to guarantee the sparsity. We give an iteration solution for this problem and give the proof of correctness. We compare our method with a number of classical methods on real-world and synthetic datasets to show the efficacy of the proposed algorithm.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Banerjee A, Dhillon I, Ghosh J et al (2003) Generative model-based clustering of directional data. In: Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, pp 19–28
Bickel S, Scheffer T (2004) Multi-view clustering. ICDM 4:19–26
Blaschko MB, Lampert CH (2008) Correlational spectral clustering. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition CVPR 2008. IEEE Conference on. IEEE, pp 1–8
Blum A, Mitchell T (1998) Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training. In: Proceedings of the eleventh annual conference on Computational learning theory. ACM, pp 92–100
Cai D, He X, Han J (2005) Document clustering using locality preserving indexing. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 17(12):1624–1637
Chaudhuri K, Kakade SM, Livescu K et al (2009) Multi-view clustering via canonical correlation analysis. In: Proceedings of the 26th annual international conference on machine learning. ACM, pp 129-136
Cortes C, Mohri M, Rostamizadeh A (2009) Learning non-linear combinations of kernels. Adv Neural Inform Process Syst:396–404
de Sa VR (2005) Spectral clustering with two views. ICML workshop on learning with multiple views, pp 20–27
Deng C, Lv Z, Liu W et al (2015) Multi-view matrix decomposition: a new scheme for exploring discriminative information. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, pp 3438–3444
Ding C, Li T, Jordan M (2010) Convex and semi-nonnegative matrix factorizations. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 32(1):45–55
Gui J, Tao D, Sun Z et al (2014) Group sparse multiview patch alignment framework with view consistency for image classification. IEEE Trans Image Process 23(7):3126–3137
Hubert L, Arabie P (1985) Comparing partitions. J Classif 2(1):193–218
Karasuyama M, Mamitsuka H (2013) Manifold-based similarity adaptation for label propagation. Adv Neural Inform Process Syst:1547–1555
Kong D, Ding CHQ, Huang H et al (2012) An iterative locally linear embedding algorithm. arXiv preprint arXiv:1206.6463
Kumar A, Rai P, Daume H (2011) Co-regularized multi-view spectral clustering. Adv Neural Inform Process Syst 2011:1413–1421
Kumar A, Daum H (2011) A co-training approach for multi-view spectral clustering. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-11), pp 393–400
Lee DD, Seung HS (2001) Algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization. Adv Neural Inform Process Syst:556–562
Liu J, Wang C, Gao J et al (2013) Multi-view clustering via joint nonnegative matrix factorization. In: Proc. of SDM. vol 13, pp 252–260
Long B, Philip SY, Zhongfei (Mark) Z (2008) A general model for multiple view unsupervised learning. SDM:822–833
Lovsz L, Plummer MD (2009) Matching theory. In: American Mathematical Society
Luo Y, Liu T, Tao D et al (2015) Multi-view matrix completion for multi-label image classification. IEEE Trans Image Process 24(8):2355–2368
Manning CD, Raghavan P, Schtze H (2008) Introduction to information retrieval. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Roweis ST, Saul LK (2000) Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science 290(5500):2323–2326
Sun S (2013) A survey of multi-view machine learning. Neural Comput Appl 23(7–8):2031–2038
Sun S, Jin F (2011) Robust co-training. Int J Pattern Recogn Artif Intell 25(07):1113–1126
Tang W, Lu Z, Dhillon IS (2009) Clustering with multiple graphs, Data Mining. ICDM’09. Ninth IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, pp 1016–1021
Tzortzis G, Likas A (2012) Kernel-based weighted multi-view clustering. Data Mining (ICDM), 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on IEEE, pp 675–684
Tzortzis GF, Likas AC (2010) Multiple view clustering using a weighted combination of exemplar-based mixture models. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 21(12):1925–1938
Von Luxburg U (2007) A tutorial on spectral clustering. Stat Comput 17(4):395–416
Wang W, Zhou ZH (2007) Analyzing co-training style algorithms. Machine Learning: ECML. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 454–465
Wang W, Zhou ZH (2010) A new analysis of co-training. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-10), pp 1135–1142
Xia T, Tao D, Mei T et al (2010) Multiview spectral embedding. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B: Cybern 40(6):1438–1446
Xia R, Pan Y, Du L et al (2014) Robust multi-view spectral clustering via low-rank and sparse decomposition. In: AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp 2149–2155
Xu C, Tao D, Xu C (2015a) Multi-view learning with incomplete views. IEEE Trans Image Process 24(12):5812–5824
Xu C, Tao D, Xu C (2015b) Multi-view intact space learning. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 37(12):2531–2544
Xu W, Liu X, Gong Y (2003) Document clustering based on non-negative matrix factorization. In: Proceedings of the 26th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in informaion retrieval. ACM, pp 267–273
Xu C, Tao D, Xu C (2013) A survey on multi-view learning. arXiv preprint: arXiv:1304.5634
Xu C, Tao D, Xu C (2015c) Multi-view self-paced learning for clustering. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, pp 3974–3980
Zhang Q, Zhang L, Zhang L et al (2015) Ensemble manifold regularized sparse low-rank approximation for multiview feature embedding. Pattern Recogn 48(10):3102–3112
Zhang X, Zhao L, Zong L et al (2014) Multi-view clustering via multi-manifold regularized nonnegative matrix factorization. Data Mining (ICDM), 2014 IEEE International Conference on IEEE, pp 1103–1108
Zhuang J, Wang J, HOI CH et al (2011) Unsupervised multiple kernel learning. J Mach Learn Res (JMLR) 20:129–144
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
This study funded by National Natural Science Foundation of People’s Republic of China 61173163, 61370200).
Communicated by A. Di Nola.
About this article
Cite this article
Feng, L., Cai, L., Liu, Y. et al. Multi-view spectral clustering via robust local subspace learning. Soft Comput 21, 1937–1948 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-016-2120-3
- Multi-view learning
- Spectral clustering
- Robust local subspace learning