Advertisement

Soft Computing

, Volume 21, Issue 14, pp 3827–3848 | Cite as

A novel evolutionary technique based on electrolocation principle of elephant nose fish and shark: fish electrolocation optimization

  • Vivekananda HaldarEmail author
  • Niladri Chakraborty
Methodologies and Application

Abstract

Elephant nose fish searches its food such as larvae by active electrolocation. It discharges electric pulse through its electric organ in tail and detects the object by analyzing the geometrical property of projected electrical image on it. The capacitance value found out from that electric image helps the fish to reach near the food source. Shark also uses passive electrolocation for the same purpose. It can target its prey by sensing the electrical wave generated due to the muscle twitching of small living beings in water. Both the above physiological phenomena, concerning the active and passive electrolocation of fish, has been mathematically developed as nature-inspired meta-heuristic technique named fish electrolocation optimization (FEO). A comparative study based on benchmark functions has been done amongst real coded genetic algorithm, accelerated particle swarm optimization, particle swarm optimization, harmony search and the proposed algorithm. Furthermore, comparative study has been done with simulated annealing and differential evolution on eggcrate function. The proposed technique has also been implemented on real-world optimization problem related to cost-based reliability enhancement in radial distribution system. It can be said by comparing percentage of success, mean number of function evaluation and standard deviation that FEO algorithm works better than other mentioned meta-heuristic techniques.

Keywords

Capacitance Electrolocation Optimization Electric image 

Abbreviations

diff

Difference between maximum and minimum limit of solution variable

longrange

A set of discrete values in long range

shortrange

A set of discrete values in short range

\(p1_l ,p2_l ,p3_l \)

Constant terms for longrange formulation

\(p1_s ,p2_s ,p3_s \)

Constant terms for shortrange formulation

vshortrange

A set of discrete values in very short range

ikj

Index terms

slopevs

Electrical image slope, short distance interval value

xnew, \(x^{\min }\) and \(x^{\max }\)

Calculated solution value after evolution, minimum and maximum limit of solution variable ‘x

\({elec}^{{pulse}}\)

Value of electric pulse for generation of new electrical wave

capucapl

Capacitor upper limit, capacitor lower limit

capintcaphover

Initial capacitor value, capacitor value when the conceptual electro-fish is hovering and searching

randfloorfixrandpermrandn and length

Standard MATLAB\(^{\textregistered }\) 7.0 library functions

\({rand}^i, {rand}_j^i \)

Random value for ith individual amongst population,random value for ith individual and jth variable

\({prob}^{{div}}, {prob}^{{sel}}\)

Probability of divergence, probability of selection

\({prob}^{{rng}}\)

Probability of range

\(x_{{best}}^t , x_{{worst}}^t \)

Best found variable value at tth iteration, worst found variable value at tth iteration

ch1 and ch2

Minimum and maximum value of objective function for the first iteration

g1, g2

Constant terms for distance calculation

\({cap}^{{run}}\)

Running capacitor value

toggle

Toggle switch or changeover switch

\(\sigma ( {x_i })\)

Symbol for standard deviation function

\({slope}^{{const}}\)

A constant value for \({elec}^{{pulse}}\) generation

Sm1 and m2

Array of random index terms concerning the length of longrangeshortrange and vshortrange

nh1 and h2

Selected random values from s, m1 and m2

c2 and c3

Values concerning shortrange and vshortrange

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to give thanks to Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, New Delhi, INSPIRE Fellowship for their financial support to pursue the research work satisfactorily. The authors also like to give thanks to Dr. Kamal Krishna Mandal for his valuable suggestion. Special thanks to the teachers and staffs of Power Engineering Department, Jadavpur University, for their co-operation.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Active electrolocation. http://www.nbb.cornell.edu/neurobio/hopkins/Publication.htm. Accessed 3 Apr 2012
  2. Afshar A, Haddad OB, Marino MA, Adams BJ (2007) Honey bee mating optimization algorithm for optimal reservoir operation. J Frankl Inst 344:452–462CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Ammari H, Boulier T, Garnier J (2013) Modeling active electrolocation in weakly electric fish. SIAM J Imaging Sci 6(1):285–321MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Baffet G, Boyer F, Gossiaux PB (2008) Biomimetic localization using the electrolocation sense of the electric fish. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics, Bangkok, pp 659–664Google Scholar
  5. Cai W, Yang WW, Chen X (2008) A global optimization algorithm based on plant growth theory: plant growth optimization. In: International conference on intelligent computation technology and automation, pp 1194–1199. doi: 10.1109/1CICTA.2008.416
  6. Cuevas E, González M, Zaldivar D, Pérez-Cisneros M, García G (2012) An algorithm inspired by collective animal behaviour. Discret Dyn Nat Soc 1–24Google Scholar
  7. Das S, Abraham A, Konar A (2008) Particle swarm optimization and differential evolution algorithms: technical analysis, applications and hybridization perspectives. Stud Comput Intell 116:1–38Google Scholar
  8. Deb K (1991) Optimal design of a welded beam via genetic algorithms. AIAA J 29:2013–2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deb K (2000) An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 186:311–338CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Dorigo M (1992) Optimization, learning and natural algorithms. Ph.D. thesis, Politencnico di Milano, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  11. Dorigo M, Caro GD (1999) Ant colony optimization: a new meta-heuristic. In: Proceedings of the IEEE congress on evolutionary computation, pp 1470–1477Google Scholar
  12. Emde GVD (1998) Electric fish measures distance in the dark. Nature 395:890–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Emde GVD (1999) Active electrolocation of objects in weekly electric fish. Exp Biol 202:1205–1215Google Scholar
  14. Emde GVD (2004a) Remote sensing with electricity: active electrolocation in fish and technical devices. In: Presented at the 1st international industrial conference, Hannover Messe, BionikGoogle Scholar
  15. Emde GVD (2004b) Distance and shape: perception of the 3-dimensional world by weekly electric fish. Physiol Paris 98:67–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Emde GVD, Schwarz S (2002) Imaging of objects through active electrolocation Gnathonemus petersii. Physiol Paris 96:431–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geem ZW, Kim JH, Loganathan GV (2001) A new heuristic optimization algorithm: harmony search. Simulation 76:60–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison Wesley, BostonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Haldar V, Chakraborty N (2011a) Switched capacitor bank installation in practical transmission system using modified cultural algorithm. In: Proceedings of the IET 2nd international conference sustainable energy and artificial intelligence, Chennai, pp 444–449Google Scholar
  20. Haldar V, Chakraborty N (2011b) Root shoot coordination optimization: conceptualizing ascent of sap and translocation of solute in plant. In: Presented at the international conference on soft computing and engineering application, KolkataGoogle Scholar
  21. He S, Wu QH, Saunders JR (2009) Group search optimizer: an optimization algorithm inspired by animal searching behaviour. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 13:973–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hedar AR (2005) Test Functions for unconstrained global optimization. http://www.optima.amp.ikyoto-u.ac.jp/member/student/hedar/Hedar-files/TestGo-files/Page364.htm. Accessed 13 May 2012
  23. Hedar AR, Fukushima M (2006) Derivative free filter simulated annealing method for constrained continuous global optimization. J Glob Optim 35:521–649MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. The University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  25. Hopkins CD (2005) Passive electrolocation and the sensory guidance of oriented behavior, pp 264–289. http://www.nbb.cornell.edu/neurobio/Hopkins/Reprints/Hopkins_passive.pdf. Accessed 3 Apr 2012
  26. Ikotun AM, Lawal ON, Adelokun AP (2011) The effectiveness of genetic algorithm in solving simultaneous equations. Intl J Comput Appl 14(2):1–4Google Scholar
  27. Kalmijn AJ (1971) The electric sense of sharks and rays. J Exp Biol 55(2):371–383Google Scholar
  28. Karaboga D, Basturk B (2007) A powerful and efficient algorithm for numerical function optimization: artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm. J Glob Optim 39:459–471MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Kennedy J, Eberhat R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE international conference on neural networks, pp 1942–1948Google Scholar
  30. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220:671–680MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Krishnanand KN, Ghose D (2005) Detection of multiple source locations using a glowworm metaphor with applications to collective robotics. In: Proceedings of the IEEE swarm intelligence symposium, Pasadena, pp 84–91Google Scholar
  32. Lee KS, Geem ZW (2005) A new meta-heuristic algorithm for continuous engineering optimization: harmony search theory and practice. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194:3902–3933CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Maciver MA, Nelson ME (2001) Towards a biorobotic electrosensory system. Auton Robot 11:263–266CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Mekhamer SF, Soliman SA, Moustafa MA, El-Hawary ME (2003) Application of fuzzy logic for reactive power compensation of radial distribution feeders. IEEE Trans Power Syst 18:206–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moscato P (1989) On evolution search, optimization, genetic algorithms and martial arts: towards memetic algorithms. Report 826, Caltech Concurrent Computation Program, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  36. Muhaureq SA, Saad M, El-Saddik A (2010) Design and implementation of echolocation optimization algorithm and its application in wireless networks. Master’s thesis, Sharjah University, SharjahGoogle Scholar
  37. Nakrani S, Tovey C (2004) On honey bees and dynamic server allocation in internet hosting centers. Adapt Behav 12:223–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nelson ME, Maciver MA (2006) Sensory acquisition in active sensing systems. J Comp Physiol A 192:573–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oftadeh R, Mahjoob MJ, Shariatpanahi M (2010) A novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm inspired by a group hunting of animals: hunting search. Comput Math Appl 60:2087–2098CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. Olivera DRD, Parnelli RS, Lopes HS (2011) Bioluminescent swarm optimization algorithm. Numer Anal Sci Comput 69–84. http://tainguyenso.vnu.edu.vn/jspui/handle/123456789/17260. Accessed 24 Mar 2012
  41. Passive electrolocation in fish. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/passive_electrolocation_in_fish. Accessed 3 Apr 2012
  42. Passino KM (2002) Bio mimicry of bacterial foraging. IEEE Control Syst Mag 52–67Google Scholar
  43. Pham DT, Ghanbarzadeh A, Koc E, Otri S, Rahim S, Zaidi M (2005) The bees algorithm. Technical Note, Manufacturing Engineering Centre, Cardiff UniversityGoogle Scholar
  44. Rao BV, Kumar GVN (2015) A comparative study of BAT and Firefly algorithm for optimal placement and sizing of static var compensator for enhancement of voltage stability. Int J Energy Optim Eng 4:68–84Google Scholar
  45. Reynolds RG (1994) An introduction to cultural algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 3rd annual conference on evolutionary programming, pp 131–139Google Scholar
  46. Seref O, Akcali E (2002) Monkey search: a new metaheuristic approach. In: Proceedings of the INFORMS annual meeting, San JoseGoogle Scholar
  47. Simon D (2006) Biogeography based optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 12:702–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shieh KT, Wilson W, Winslow M, Mcbride DW Jr, Hopkins CD (1996) Short-range orientation in electric fish: an experimental study of passive electrolocation. Exp Biol 199:2383–2393Google Scholar
  49. Solberg JR, Lynch KM, Maciver MA (2008) Active electrolocation for underwater target localization. Int J Robot Res 27:529–548Google Scholar
  50. Solberg JR, Lynch KM, Maciver MA (2013) Robotic electrolocation: active underwater target localization with electric fields. http://nxr.northwestern.edu/sites/default/files/publications/Solb07a.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2013
  51. Startchev K, Fua P, Porez M, Crepsi A, Ijspeert A (2011) Algorithms inspired from active electrolocation behaviour of weak electric fish, developed for autonomous eel-like swimming robot.http://www.emn.fr/z-dre/bionic-robots-workshop/uploads/Abstracts%20BRW%202011/15.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2013
  52. Storn R (1996) On the usage of differential evolution for function optimization. In: Biennial conference of the north American fuzzy information processing society, pp 519–523Google Scholar
  53. Storn R, Price K (1997) Differential evolution—a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Glob Optim 11:341–359MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. Teodorovic’ D, DelĺOrco M (2005) Bee colony optimization—a cooperative learning approach to complex transportation problem. In: Proceedings of the 10th EWGT meeting, PoznanGoogle Scholar
  55. Tong L, Wei-Ling S, Chung-feng W (2004) A global optimization bionics algorithm for solving integer programming—plant growth simulation algorithm. In: Proceedings of the international conference management science and engineering, Harbin, pp 531–535Google Scholar
  56. Vo DN, Schegner P (2013) An improved particle swarm optimization for optimal power flow. In: Vasant PM (ed) Meta-heuristics optimization algorithms in engineering, business, economics, and finance, vol 1, pp 1–40Google Scholar
  57. Wright AH (1991) Genetic algorithm for real parameter optimization, pp 1–12. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu. Accessed 13 Mar 2012
  58. Yang XS (2005) Engineering optimization via nature-inspired virtual bee algorithms. In: IWINAC’05. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3562, pp 317–323Google Scholar
  59. Yang XS (2009) Firefly algorithms for multimodal optimization. Lect Notes Comput Sci 5792:169–178MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  60. Yang XS (2010a) A new meta-heuristic bat-inspired algorithm. Stud Comput Intell 284:65–74Google Scholar
  61. Yang XS (2010b) Nature inspired meta-heuristic technique. Luniver Press, BristolGoogle Scholar
  62. Yang XS, Deb S (2009) Cuckoo search via lévy flights. In: Proceedings of the IEEE world congress nature and biologically inspired computing, pp 210–214Google Scholar
  63. Yuce B, Mastrocinque E, Packianather MS, Lambiase A, Pham DT (2015) The bees algorithm and its application. In: Vasant PM (ed) Handbook of research on artificial intelligence techniques and algorithms, vol 4, pp 122–151Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Power Engineering DepartmentJadavpur UniversityKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations