Soft Computing

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 71–78 | Cite as

Genetic programming of the stochastic interpolation framework: convection–diffusion equation

  • Daniel HowardEmail author
  • Adrian Brezulianu
  • Joseph Kolibal


The stochastic interpolation (SI) framework of function recovery from input data comprises a de-convolution step followed by a convolution step with row stochastic matrices generated by a mollifier, such as a probability density function. The choice of a mollifier and of how it gets weighted, offers unprecedented flexibility to vary both the interpolation character and the extent of influence of neighbouring data values. In this respect, a soft computing method such as a genetic algorithm or heuristic method may assist applications that model complex or unknown relationships between data by tuning the parameters, functional and component choices inherent in SI. Alternatively or additionally, the input data itself can be reverse engineered to recover a function that satisfies properties, as illustrated in this paper with a genetic programming scheme that enables SI to recover the analytical solution to a two-point boundary value convection–diffusion differential equation. If further developed, this nascent solution method could serve as an alternative to the weighted residual methods, as these are known to have inherent mathematical difficulties.


Genetic Programming Diffusion Equation Peclet Number Bernstein Function Weighted Residual Method 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abramowitz M, Stegun IA (1972) Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables, 9th printing. New York, DoverGoogle Scholar
  2. Axelsson O, Barker V (1984) Finite element solution of boundary value problems. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Benson DJA (1991) Finite volume solution of Stokes and Navier–Stokes equations. Ph.D. thesis. University of Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  4. Boole G, Moulton JFA (1960) Treatise on the calculus of finite differences, 2nd edn. Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Gresho PM, Lee RL (1979) Don’t suppress the wiggles—they’re telling you something. In: Finite element methods for convection dominated flows. Proceedings of the winter annual meeting, New York (A80-27887 10-34). American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, pp 37–61, 2–7 Dec 1979Google Scholar
  6. Hemker PW (1977) A numerical study of stiff two point boundary value problems. Ph.D. thesis. In: MCT 80.Mathematical Centre, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  7. Howard D, Roberts SC (2001) Genetic programming solution of the convection–diffusion equation. In: Lee Spector et al (ed) Proceedings of the genetic and evolutionary computation conference (GECCO-2001). Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, pp 34–41, 7–11 July 2001Google Scholar
  8. Howard D, Kolibal J, Brezulianu A (2009) Engineering presentation of the stochastic interpolation framework and its applications. Soft Comput (accepted)Google Scholar
  9. Koza JR (1992) Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection. MIT Press, CambridgezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Morton KW (1996) Numerical solution of convection–diffusion problems. Applied mathematics and mathematical computation, vol 12. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Howard
    • 1
    Email author
  • Adrian Brezulianu
    • 2
  • Joseph Kolibal
    • 3
  1. 1.Howard Science LimitedMalvernUK
  2. 2.“Gh.Asach” Technical University of IasiIasiRomania
  3. 3.University of Southern MississippiHattiesburgUSA

Personalised recommendations