Skip to main content
Log in

Team situation awareness measure using semantic utility functions for supporting dynamic decision-making

  • Focus
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Team decision-making is a remarkable feature in a complex dynamic decision environment, which can be supported by team situation awareness. In this paper, a team situation awareness measure (TSAM) method using a semantic utility function is proposed. The semantic utility function is used to clarify the semantics of qualitative information expressed in linguistic terms. The individual and team situation awareness are treated as linguistic possibility distributions on the potential decisions in a dynamic decision environment. In the TSAM method, team situation awareness is generated through reasoning and aggregating individual situation awareness based on a multi-level hierarchy mental model of the team. Individual and team mental models are composed of key drivers and significant variables. An illustrative example in telecoms customer churn prediction is given to explain the effectiveness and the main steps of the TSAM method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berson A, Smith S, Thearling K (2000) Building data mining applications for CRM. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Blandford A, Wong BLW (2004) Situation awareness in emergency medical dispatch. Int J Hum Comput Stud 61:421–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho PV, dos Santos IL, Vidal MC (2006) Safety implications of cultural and cognitive issues in nuclear power plant operation. Appl Ergonomics 37:211–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datta P, Masand B, Mani DR, Li B (2000) Automated cellular modeling and prediction on a large scale. Artif Intell Rev 14(6):485–502

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Endsley MR (1995a) Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems: situation awareness. Hum Factors 37(1):32–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endsley MR (1995b) Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors 37(1):65–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endsley MR, Garland DJ (2000) Situation awareness analysis and measurement. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn PC (1970) Utility theory for decision making. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gopal RK, Meher SK (2008) Customer churn time prediction in mobile telecommunication industry using ordinal regression. In: PAKDD2008, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol 5012, Springer, Berlin, pp 884–889

  • Grabisch M, Labreuche C (2005) Fuzzy measures and integrals in MCDA. In: Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (eds) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys, international series in operations research and management science, chap 14, vol 78. Springer, New York, pp 563–604

  • Hadden J, Tiwari A, Roy R, Ruta D (2005) Computer assisted customer churn management: state-of-the-art and future trends. Comput Oper Res 34:2902–2917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (2000) Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets Syst 115:45–65

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Martínez L (2000) A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 8(6):746–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung SY, Yen DC, Wang HY (2006) Applying data mining to telecom churn management. Expert Syst Appl 31:515–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaber DB, Perry CM, Segall N, McClernon CK, Prinzel LP III (2006) Situation awareness implications of adaptive automation for information processing in an air traffic control-related task. Int J Ind Ergonomics 36(5):447–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanno T, Nakata K, Furuta K (2006) A method for conflict detection based on team intention inference. Interact Comput 18(4):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirlik A, Strauss R (2006) Situation awareness as judgment I: statistical modeling and quantitative measurement. Int J Ind Ergonomics 36:463–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kon M (2004) Stop customer churn before it starts. Harv Manag Update 9(7):3–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawry J (2001) A methodology for computing with words. Int J Approx Reason 28:51–89

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lawry J (2004) A framework for linguistic modelling. Artif Intell 155:1–39

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lawry J (2008) An overview of computing with words using label semantics. In: Bustince H, Herrera F, Montero J (eds) Fuzzy sets and their extensions: representation, aggregation and models. Springer, Berlin, pp 65–87

  • Lu J, Zhang G, Ruan D, Wu F (2007) Multi-objective group decision making—methods, software and applications with fuzzy set technology. Imperial College Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma J, Xu Y, Ruan D, Zhang G (2007) A fuzzy-set approach to treat determinacy and consistency of linguistic terms in multi-criteria decision making. Int J Approx Reason 44(2):165–181

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • McMarley JS, Wickens CD, Goh J, Horrey WJ (2002) A computational model of attention/situation awareness. In: Proceedings of the 46th annual meeting of the human factors and ergonomic society. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica

  • Munda G (2009) A conflict analysis approach for illuminating distributional issues in sustainability policy. Eur J Oper Res 194(1):307–322

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ruan D, Liu J, Carchon R (2003) Linguistic assessment approach for managing nuclear safeguards indicator information. Logist Inf Manag 16(6):401–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon P, Stanton N, Walker G, Green D (2006) Situation awareness measurement: a review of applicability for c4i environments. Appl Ergonomics 37:225–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaafstal AM, Johnston JH, Oser RL (2001) Training teams for emergency management. Comput Hum Behav 17:615–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shu Y, Furuta K (2005) An inference method of team situation awareness based on mutual awareness. Cogn Technol Work 7:272–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss R, Kirlik A (2006) Situation awareness as judgment II: experimental demonstration. Int J Ind Ergonomics 36:475–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhlarik J, Comerford DA (2002) A review of situation awareness literature relevant to pilot surveillance functions. Technical Report DOT/FAA/AM-02/3, Department of Psychology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA

  • Ying M (2002) A formal model of computing with words. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 10(5):640–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1996) Fuzzy logic = computing with words. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 4(2):103–111

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work presented in this paper was supported by Australian Research Council (ARC) under Discovery Project DP0559213 and DP0880739. The authors sincerely appreciate the advice and suggestions of Professor Da Ruan from the Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK CEN).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Ma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ma, J., Lu, J. & Zhang, G. Team situation awareness measure using semantic utility functions for supporting dynamic decision-making. Soft Comput 14, 1305–1316 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-009-0500-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-009-0500-7

Keywords

Navigation