Skip to main content
Log in

Invariant fuzzy implications

  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Paper deals with fuzzy implications invariant with respect to the family of all increasing bijections in [0,1]. We describe the family of all such fuzzy implications which forms a distributive lattice. The classical implication axioms are verified in this family.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baczyński M (2002) Contrapositive symmetry of distributive fuzzy implications. Internat J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl-Based Syst 10:135–147

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baczyński M, Drewniak J (1999) Conjugacy classes of fuzzy implications. In: Reusch B (ed) Computational intelligence: theory and applications. Lecture notes, computer science, vol 1625. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 287–298

  3. Baczyński M, Drewniak J (2000) Monotonic fuzzy implications. In: Szczepaniak PS, Lisboa PJG, Kacprzyk J (eds) Fuzzy systems in medicine, studies in fuzziness and soft computing, vol 41. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 90–111

  4. Baldwin JF, Pilsworth BW (1980) Axiomatic approach to implication for approximate reasoning with fuzzy logic. Fuzzy Sets Syst 3:193–219

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bartłomiejczyk L, Drewniak J (2004) A characterization of sets and operations invariant under bijections. Aequationes Math 68:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cordón O, Herrera F, Peregrin A (1997) Applicability of the fuzzy operators in the design of fuzzy logic controllers. Fuzzy Sets Syst 86:15–41

    Google Scholar 

  7. Drewniak J (1999) Selfconjugate fuzzy implications. In: Proceedings of the EUROFUSE-SIC'99, 25–28 May 1999, Budapest, pp 351–353

  8. Drewniak J (2004) Algebraic properties of invariant binary operations. In: Atanassov KT et al (eds) Soft computing foundations and theoretical aspects, EXIT, Warszawa, pp 143–150

  9. Dubois D, Prade H (1991) Fuzzy sets in approximate reasoning. Part 1: inference with possibility distributions. Fuzzy Sets Syst 40:143–202

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fodor JC (1995) Contrapositive symmetry of fuzzy implications. Fuzzy Sets Syst 69:141–156

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fodor J, Roubens M (1994) Fuzzy preference modelling and multicriteria decision support. Kluwer, Dordrecht

  12. Gottwald S (2001) A treatise on many-valued logics. Studies in logic and computation, vol 9. Research Studies Press, Baldock

  13. Klement EP, Navara M (1999) A survey on different triangular norm-based fuzzy logics. Fuzzy Sets Syst 101:241–251

    Google Scholar 

  14. Klement EP, Mesiar R, Pap E (2000) Triangular norms. Kluwer, Dordrecht

  15. Kiszka JB, Kochańska ME, Śliwińska DS (1985) The influence of some fuzzy implication operators on the accuracy of a fuzzy model. Fuzzy Sets Syst 15:111–128, 223–240

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Mesiar R, Rückschlossová T (2004) Characterization of invariant aggregation operators. Fuzzy Sets Syst 142:63–73

  17. Rescher N (1969) Many-valued logic. McGraw-Hill, New York

  18. Whitehead AI, Russel B (1997) Principia mathematice to *56. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Józef Drewniak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Drewniak, J. Invariant fuzzy implications. Soft Comput 10, 506–513 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-005-0526-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-005-0526-4

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation