Skip to main content
Log in

Cytokine storm mitigation for exogenous immune agonists

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cytokine storm is a life-threatening inflammatory response characterized by hyperactivation of the immune system. It can be caused by various therapies, auto-immune conditions, or pathogens, such as respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 which causes coronavirus disease COVID-19. Here we propose a conceptual mathematical model describing the phenomenology of cytokine-immune interactions when a tumor is treated by an exogenous immune cell agonist which has the potential to cause a cytokine storm, such as CAR T cell therapy. Numerical simulations reveal that as a function of just two model parameters, the same drug dose and regimen could result in one of four outcomes: treatment success without a storm, treatment success with a storm, treatment failure without a storm, and treatment failure with a storm. We then explore a scenario in which tumor control is accompanied by a storm and ask if it is possible to modulate the duration and frequency of drug administration (without changing the cumulative dose) in order to preserve efficacy while preventing the storm. Simulations reveal existence of a “sweet spot” in protocol space (number versus spacing of doses) for which tumor control is achieved without inducing a cytokine storm. This theoretical model, which contains a number of parameters that can be estimated experimentally, contributes to our understanding of what triggers a cytokine storm, and how the likelihood of its occurrence can be mitigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ye Q, Wang B, Mao J (2020) The pathogenesis and treatment of the Cytokine Storm’in COVID-19. J Infect 80(6):607–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferrara JL (1993) Cytokine dysregulation as a mechanism of graft versus host disease. Curr Opinion Immunol 5(5):794–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Eloseily EM, Cron RQ (2019) Bacteria-associated cytokine storm syndrome. Cytokine Storm Syndrome, pp 307–317

  4. Huang K-J, Su I-J, Theron M, Wu Y-C, Lai S-K, Liu C-C, et al (2005) An interferon-γ-related cytokine storm in SARS patients. J Med Virol 75(2):185–194

  5. Oxford JS, Gill D (2018) Unanswered questions about the 1918 influenza pandemic: origin, pathology, and the virus itself. Lancet Infect Dis 18(11):e348–e354

  6. Porter D, Frey N, Wood PA, Weng Y, Grupp SA (2018) Grading of cytokine release syndrome associated with the CAR T cell therapy tisagenlecleucel. J Hematol Oncol 11(1):35

  7. Chen X, Kamperschroer C, Wong G, Xuan D (2019) A modeling framework to characterize cytokine release upon T-cell–engaging bispecific antibody treatment: methodology and opportunities. Clin Transl Sci 12(6):600–608

  8. Suntharalingam G, Perry MR, Ward S, Brett SJ, Castello-Cortes A, Brunner MD, et al (2006) Cytokine storm in a phase 1 trial of the anti-CD28 monoclonal antibody TGN1412. N Engl J Med 355(10):1018–1028

  9. Fajgenbaum DC, June CH (2020) Cytokine storm. N Engl J Med 383(23):2255–2273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tisoncik JR, Korth MJ, Simmons CP, Farrar J, Martin TR, Katze MG (2012) Into the eye of the cytokine storm. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 76(1):16–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang X, Lu X, Yang J, Zhang G, Li J, Song L et al (2020) Efficacy and safety of anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in 110 patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia with high-risk features. Blood Adv 4(10):2325–2338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Maude SL, Laetsch TW, Buechner J, Rives S, Boyer M, Bittencourt H et al (2018) Tisagenlecleucel in children and young adults with B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 378(5):439–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Park JH, Rivière I, Gonen M, Wang X, Sénéchal B, Curran KJ et al (2018) Long-term follow-up of CD19 CAR therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 378(5):449–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee DW, Kochenderfer JN, Stetler-Stevenson M, Cui YK, Delbrook C, Feldman SA et al (2015) T cells expressing CD19 chimeric antigen receptors for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children and young adults: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Lancet 385(9967):517–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Park JH, Geyer MB, Brentjens RJ (2016) CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapeutics for hematologic malignancies: interpreting clinical outcomes to date. Blood J Am Soc Hematol 127(26):3312–3320

    Google Scholar 

  16. Waito M, Walsh SR, Rasiuk A, Bridle BW, Willms AR (2016) A mathematical model of cytokine dynamics during a cytokine storm. Math Comput Approach Adv Mod Sci Eng, 331–339

  17. Yiu HH, Graham AL, Stengel RF (2012) Dynamics of a cytokine storm. PloS one 7(10):e45027

  18. Hopkins B, Tucker M, Pan Y, Fang N, Huang ZJ (2018) A model-based investigation of cytokine storm for T-cell therapy. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51(19):76–79

  19. Rana P, Chauhan S, Mubayi A. Burden of cytokines storm on prognosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection through immune response: dynamic analysis and optimal control with immunomodulatory therapy. Eur Phys J Special Topics, 1–19

  20. Baker M, Denman-Johnson S, Brook BS, Gaywood I, Owen MR (2013) Mathematical modelling of cytokine-mediated inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Math Med Biol: J IMA 30(4):311–337

  21. Zhang W, Jang S, Jonsson CB, Allen LJ (2019) Models of cytokine dynamics in the inflammatory response of viral zoonotic infectious diseases. Math Med Biol: J IMA 36(3):269–295

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Karki R, Sharma BR, Tuladhar S, Williams EP, Zalduondo L, Samir P, et al (2020) COVID-19 cytokines and the hyperactive immune response: synergism of TNF-α and IFN-γ in triggering inflammation, tissue damage, and death. bioRxiv. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

  23. Delitala M, Ferraro M (2020) Is the Allee effect relevant in cancer evolution and therapy? AIMS Math 5(6):7649

  24. Johnson KE, Howard G, Mo W, Strasser MK, Lima EABF, Huang S et al (2019) Cancer cell population growth kinetics at low densities deviate from the exponential growth model and suggest an Allee effect. PLoS Biol 17:e3000399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wilke CM, Wei S, Wang L, Kryczek I, Kao J, Zou W (2011) Dual biological effects of the cytokines interleukin-10 and interferon-γ. Cancer Immunol Immunother 60(11):1529–1541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Luheshi N, Rothwell N, Brough D (2009) Dual functionality of interleukin-1 family cytokines: implications for anti-interleukin-1 therapy. Br J Pharmacol 157(8):1318–1329

  27. Shimabukuro-Vornhagen A, Gödel P, Subklewe M, Stemmler HJ, Schlößer HA, Schlaak M et al (2018) Cytokine release syndrome. J Immunother Cancer 6(1):56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee DW, Gardner R, Porter DL, Louis CU, Ahmed N, Jensen M et al (2014) Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of cytokine release syndrome. Blood Am Soc Hematol 124(2):188–195

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ando M, Takahashi Y, Yamashita T, Fujimoto M, Nishikawa M, Watanabe Y et al (2014) Prevention of adverse events of interferon γ gene therapy by gene delivery of interferon γ-heparin-binding domain fusion protein in mice. Mol Ther-Methods Clin Dev 1:14023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Castell JV, Geiger T, Gross V, Andus T, Walter E, Hirano T et al (1988) Plasma clearance, organ distribution and target cells of interleukin-6/hepatocyte-stimulating factor in the rat. Eur J Biochem 177(2):357–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cardilin T, Almquist J, Jirstrand M, Sostelly A, Amendt C, El Bawab S et al (2017) Tumor static concentration curves in combination therapy. AAPS J 19(2):456–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hather G, Liu R, Bandi S, Mettetal J, Manfredi M, Shyu W-C, et al (2014) Growth rate analysis and efficient experimental design for tumor xenograft studies: supplementary issue: array platform modeling and analysis (A). Cancer Inform 13:CIN–S13974

  33. Santomasso B, Bachier C, Westin J, Rezvani K, Shpall EJ (2019) The other side of CAR T-cell therapy: cytokine release syndrome, neurologic toxicity, and financial burden. American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book. American Society of Clinical Oncology Alexandria, VA; 2019;39:433–444

  34. Neelapu SS, Locke FL, Bartlett NL, Lekakis LJ, Miklos DB, Jacobson CA et al (2017) Axicabtagene ciloleucel CAR T-cell therapy in refractory large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 377(26):2531–2544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Schuster SJ, Bishop MR, Tam CS, Waller EK, Borchmann P, McGuirk JP et al (2019) Tisagenlecleucel in adult relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 380(1):45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shah NN, Fry TJ (2019) Mechanisms of resistance to CAR T cell therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 16(6):372–385

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gardner RA, Finney O, Annesley C, Brakke H, Summers C, Leger K et al (2017) Intent-to-treat leukemia remission by CD19 CAR T cells of defined formulation and dose in children and young adults. Blood J Am Soc Hematol 129(25):3322–3331

    Google Scholar 

  38. Chelliah V, Lazarou G, Bhatnagar S, Gibbs JP, Nijsen M, Ray A, et al (2020) Quantitative systems pharmacology approaches for immuno-oncology: adding virtual patients to the development paradigm. Clin Pharmacol Therap

  39. Surendran A, Le Sauteur-Robitaille J, Kleimeier D, Gevertz JL, Wilkie KP, Jenner AL, et al (2022) Approaches to generating virtual patient cohorts with applications in oncology. bioRxiv. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

  40. Barish S, Ochs MF, Sontag ED, Gevertz JL (2017) Evaluating optimal therapy robustness by virtual expansion of a sample population, with a case study in cancer immunotherapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114(31):E6277–E6286

  41. Luo MC, Nikolopoulou E, Gevertz JL (2022) From fitting the average to fitting the individual: a cautionary tale for mathematical modelers. Front Oncol 1311

  42. Giavridis T, van der Stegen SJ, Eyquem J, Hamieh M, Piersigilli A, Sadelain M (2018) CAR T cell–induced cytokine release syndrome is mediated by macrophages and abated by IL-1 blockade. Nat Med 24(6):731–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Davila ML, Riviere I, Wang X, Bartido S, Park J, Curran K, et al (2014) Efficacy and toxicity management of 19–28z CAR T cell therapy in B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Sci Transl Med 6(224):224ra25–224ra25

  44. Riss T, Niles A, Moravec R, Karassina N, Vidugiriene J (2019) Cytotoxicity assays: in vitro methods to measure dead cells. Assay Guidance Manual. Eli Lilly & Company and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

  45. Betts A, Haddish-Berhane N, Shah DK, Graaf PH van der, Barletta F, King L, et al (2019) A translational quantitative systems pharmacology model for CD3 bispecific molecules: application to quantify T cell-mediated tumor cell killing by P-cadherin LP DART®. AAPS J 21(4):1–16

  46. Chen X, Haddish-Berhane N, Moore P, Clark T, Yang Y, Li H, et al (2016) Mechanistic projection of first-in-human dose for bispecific immunomodulatory P-Cadherin LP-DART: an integrated PK/PD modeling approach. Clin Pharmacol Therap 100(3):232–241

  47. Duflo E (2017) The economist as plumber. Am Econ Rev 107(5):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors report no external sources of funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

IK and JG contributed equally to all stages of manuscript preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irina Kareva.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

IK is an employee of EMD Serono, US subsidiary of Merck KGaA. Views expressed in this manuscript are author’s personal views and do not necessarily represent the views of EMD Serono.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kareva, I., Gevertz, J.L. Cytokine storm mitigation for exogenous immune agonists. Math. Control Signals Syst. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00498-023-00362-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00498-023-00362-5

Keywords

Navigation