Skip to main content
Log in

Strong input-to-state stability for infinite-dimensional linear systems

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with strong versions of input-to-state stability for infinite-dimensional linear systems with an unbounded control operator. We show that strong input-to-state stability with respect to inputs in an Orlicz space is a sufficient condition for a system to be strongly integral input-to-state stable with respect to bounded inputs. In contrast to the special case of systems with exponentially stable semigroup, the converse fails in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We emphasize that a finite-dimensional input space does not imply that B is a bounded operator since in our setting the range of B may exceed the state space; see Sect. 2.

References

  1. Clarke FH, Ledyaev YS, Stern RJ (1998) Asymptotic stability and smooth Lyapunov functions. J Differ Equ 149(1):69–114

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Dashkovskiy S, Mironchenko A (2013) Input-to-state stability of infinite-dimensional control systems. Math Control Signals Syst 25(1):1–35

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Engel KJ, Nagel R (2000) One-parameter semigroups for linear evolution equations, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol 194. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Jacob B, Nabiullin R, Partington J, Schwenninger F (2018) Infinite-dimensional input-to-state stability and Orlicz spaces. SIAM J Control Optim 56(2):868–889. https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1099467

  5. Jacob B, Schnaubelt R (2007) Observability of polynomially stable systems. Syst Control Lett 56(4):277–284

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Jacob B, Schwenninger FL, Zwart H (2017) On continuity of solutions for parabolic control systems and input-to-state stability. Submitted, available at arXiv: 1709.04261

  7. Jayawardhana B, Logemann H, Ryan E (2008) Infinite-dimensional feedback systems: the circle criterion and input-to-state stability. Commun Inf Syst 8(4):413–414

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Karafyllis I, Krstic M (2016) ISS with respect to boundary disturbances for 1-D parabolic PDEs. IEEE Trans Automat Control 61:3712–3724

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Karafyllis I, Krstic M (2017) ISS in different norms for 1-D parabolic PDEs with boundary disturbances. SIAM J Control Optim 55:1716–1751

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Knopp K (1928) Theory and application of infinite series. Blackie & Sons. XII, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Krasnosel’skiĭ M, Rutickiĭ Y (1961) Convex functions and Orlicz spaces. Translated from the first Russian edition by Leo F. Boron. P. Noordhoff Ltd., Groningen

  12. Kufner A, John O, Fučík S (1977) Function spaces. Noordhoff International Publishing, Leyden; Academia, Prague Monographs and Textbooks on Mechanics of Solids and Fluids. Analysis, Mechanics

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Mazenc F, Prieur C (2011) Strict Lyapunov functions for semilinear parabolic partial differential equations. Math Control Relat Fields 1(2):231–250

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Mironchenko A, Ito H (2016) Characterizations of integral input-to-state stability for bilinear systems in infinite dimensions. Math Control Relat Fields 6(3):447–466

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Mironchenko A, Wirth F (2017) Characterizations of input-to-state stability for infinite-dimensional systems. Accepted to IEEE Trans Automat Control

  16. Morse M, Transue W (1950) Functionals \(F\) bilinear over the product \(A\times B\) of two pseudo-normed vector spaces. II. Admissible spaces \(A\). Ann Math (2) 51:576–614

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Sontag E (1989) Smooth stabilization implies coprime factorization. IEEE Trans Automat Control 34(4):435–443

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Sontag E (1998) Comments on integral variants of ISS. Syst Control Lett 34(1–2):93–100

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Sontag E (2008) Input to state stability: basic concepts and results. In: Nonlinear and optimal control theory, Lecture Notes in Math., vol 1932, pp 163–220. Springer, Berlin

  20. Weiss G (1989) Admissibility of unbounded control operators. SIAM J Control Optim 27(3):527–545

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Zaanen A (1953) Linear analysis. Measure and integral, Banach and Hilbert space, linear integral equations. Interscience Publishers Inc., New York; North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam; P. Noordhoff N.V., Groningen

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Birgit Jacob for valuable discussions and helpful comments on the manuscript. They are also very grateful to the anonymous referees for their careful reading of the manuscript and their suggestions for improvements.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Nabiullin.

Additional information

RN is supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Grant JA 735/12-1).

FLS is supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Grant RE 2917/4-1).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nabiullin, R., Schwenninger, F.L. Strong input-to-state stability for infinite-dimensional linear systems. Math. Control Signals Syst. 30, 4 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00498-018-0210-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00498-018-0210-8

Keywords

Navigation