Skip to main content
Log in

Uniform stabilization for linear systems with persistency of excitation: the neutrally stable and the double integrator cases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consider the controlled system dx/dt = Ax + α(t)Bu where the pair (A, B) is stabilizable and α(t) takes values in [0, 1] and is persistently exciting, i.e., there exist two positive constants μ, T such that, for every t ≥ 0, \({\int_t^{t+T}\alpha(s){\rm d}s \geq \mu}\). In particular, when α(t) becomes zero the system dynamics switches to an uncontrollable system. In this paper, we address the following question: is it possible to find a linear time-invariant state-feedback u = Kx, with K only depending on (A, B) and possibly on μ, T, which globally asymptotically stabilizes the system? We give a positive answer to this question for two cases: when A is neutrally stable and when the system is the double integrator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aeyels D, Peuteman J (1998) A new asymptotic stability criterion for nonlinear time-variant differential equations. IEEE Trans Automat Control 43: 968–971

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Aeyels D, Peuteman J (1999) On exponential stability of nonlinear time-varying differential equations. Automatica J IFAC 35: 1091–1100

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Aeyels D, Sepulchre R (1994) On the convergence of a time-variant linear differential equation arising in identification. Kybernetika 30: 715–723

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson BDO (1977) Exponential stability of linear equations arising in adaptive identification. IEEE Trans Automat Control 22: 83–88

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Boscain U (2002) Stability of planar switched systems: the linear single input case. SIAM J Control Optim 41: 89–112

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Branicky MS (1998) Multiple Lyapunov functions and other analysis tools for switched and hybrid systems. IEEE Trans Automat Control 43: 475–482

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Brezis H (1983) Analyse fonctionnelle, Théorie et applications. Collection Mathématiques Appliquées pour la Maîtrise, Masson

  8. Colaneri P, Geromel JC, Astolfi A (2005) Stabilization of continuous-time nonlinear switched systems. In: Proc 44th IEEE conf decision contr (Sevilla, Spain)

  9. Gihman II (1952) Concerning a theorem of N. N. Bogolyubov (Russian). Ukrain Mat Ž 4: 215–219

  10. Liberzon D (2003) Switching in systems and control. Systems and control: foundations and applications. Birkhäuser, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liu W, Sussmann HJ (1999) Continuous dependence with respect to the input of trajectories of control-affine systems. SIAM J Control Optim 37: 777–803

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Loría A, Chaillet A, Besancon G, Chitour Y (2005) On the PE stabilization of time-varying systems: open questions and preliminary answers. In: Proc 44th IEEE conf decision contr (Sevilla, Spain), pp 6847–6852

  13. Morgan AP, Narendra KS (1977) On the stability of nonautonomous differential equations \({\dot{x} = [A + B(t)]x}\) with skew-symmetric matrix B(t). SIAM J Control Optim 15: 163–176

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Segal IE, Kunze RA (1978) Integrals and operators. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Shorten R, Wirth F, Mason O, Wulff K, King C (2007) Stability criteria for switched and hybrid systems. SIAM Revi (to appear)

  16. Sontag E (1998) Mathematical control theory: deterministic finite dimensional systems. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Teel AR, Peuteman J, Aeyels D (1999) Semi-global practical stability and averaging. Systems Control Lett 37: 329–334

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yacine Chitour.

Additional information

Notation

A continuous function \({\phi : \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0} \to \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}}\) is of class \({\mathcal{K}\, (\phi \in \mathcal{K})}\), if it is strictly increasing and \({\phi(0) = 0.\, \psi : \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0} \to \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}}\) is of class \({\mathcal{L}\, (\psi \in \mathcal{L})}\) if it is continuous, non-increasing and tends to zero as its argument tends to infinity. A function \({\beta : \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0} \times \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0} \to \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}}\) is said to be a class \({\mathcal{KL}}\)-function if, \({\beta(\cdot,t) \in \mathcal{K}}\) for any t ≥ 0, and \({\beta(s, \cdot) \in \mathcal{L}}\) for any s ≥ 0. We use |·| for the Euclidean norm of vectors and the induced L 2-norm of matrices.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chaillet, A., Chitour, Y., Loría, A. et al. Uniform stabilization for linear systems with persistency of excitation: the neutrally stable and the double integrator cases. Math. Control Signals Syst. 20, 135–156 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00498-008-0024-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00498-008-0024-1

Keywords

Navigation