Sequencing the genomic regions flanking S-linked PvGLO sequences confirms the presence of two GLO loci, one of which lies adjacent to the style-length determinant gene CYP734A50
- 452 Downloads
Primula vulgaris contains two GLOBOSA loci, one located adjacent to the style length determinant gene CYP734A50 which lies within the S -locus.
Using a combination of BAC walking and PacBio sequencing, we have sequenced two substantial genomic contigs in and around the S-locus of Primula vulgaris. Using these data, we were able to demonstrate that two alleles of PvGlo P as well as PvGlo T can be present in the genome of a single plant, providing empirical evidence that these two forms of the MADS-box gene GLOBOSA are separate loci and not allelic as previously reported. We propose they should be renamed PvGLO1 and PvGLO2. BAC contigs extending from each GLOBOSA locus were identified and fully sequenced. No homologous genes were found between the contigs other than the GLOBOSA genes themselves, consistent with their identity as separate loci. Exons of the recently identified style-length determinant gene CYP734A50 were identified on one end of the contig containing PvGLO2 and these genes are adjacent in the genome, suggesting that PvGLO2 lies either within or at least very close to the S-locus. Current evidence suggests that both CYP734A50 and GLO2 are specific to the S-morph mating type and are hemizygous rather than heterozygous in the Primula genome. This finding contrasts classical models of the HSI locus, which propose that components of the S-locus are allelic, suggesting that these models may need to be reconsidered.
KeywordsHeteromorphic self-incompatibility Globosa S-locus
The authors thank Chuck Cody for greenhouse support, Dave Dutton for technical assistance and Derek Pouchnik and Mark Wildung of the WSU Genomic Core Lab for BAC sequencing and assembly.
- Aii J, Nagano M, Woo SH, Campbell C (1999) Development of SCAR markers linked to the Sh gene in buckwheat. Fagopyrum 16:19–22Google Scholar
- Darlington CD, Mather K (1949) The elements of genetics. Allen and Unwin Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Darwin C (1862) On the two forms, or dimorphic conditions, in the species of Primula, and on their remarkable sexual relations. Proc Linn Soc (Botany) 6:105–139Google Scholar
- Hildebrand F (1863) De la variation des animeaux et des plantes a l’etat domestique. C Reinwald, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Huu CN, Kappel C, Keller B, Sicard A, Takebayashi Y, Breuninger H, Nowak MD, Bäurle I, Himmelbach A, Burkart M, Ebbing-Lohaus T, Sakakibara H, Altschmied L, Conti E, Lenhard M (2016) Presence versus absence of CYP734A50 underlies the style-length dimorphism in primroses. eLife. doi: 10.7554/eLife.17956 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Jones P, Binns D, Chang HY, Fraser M, Li W, McAnulla C, McWilliam H, Maslen J, Mitchell A, Nuka G, Pesseat S, Quinn AF, Sangrador-Vegas A, Scheremetjew M, Yong SY, Lopez R, Hunter S (2014) InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30(9):1236–1240CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Khosravi D, Siu KWM, Shore JS (2006) A proteomics approach to the study of distyly in Turnera species. In: Teixeira d Silva JA (ed) Floriculture, ornamental and plant biotechnology advances and topical issues, vol 1. Global Science Books, London, pp 51–60Google Scholar
- Lee T, Peace C, Jung S, Zheng P, Main D, Cho I (2011) GenSAS: an online integrated genome sequence annotation pipeline. In: 4th International conference on biomedical engineering and informatics (BMEI), Shanghai, 2011, pp. 1967–1973. doi: 10.1109/BMEI.2011.6098712
- McCubbin AG (2008) Heteromorphic self-incompatibility in Primula: 21st century tools promise to unravel a classic 19th century model system. In: Franklin-Tong V (ed) Self-incompatibility in flowering plants: evolution, diversity and mechanisms. Springer, Berlin, pp 286–308Google Scholar
- Zimmer R, Verrinder Gibbins AM (1997) Construction and characterization of a large-fragment chicken bacterial artificial chromosome library. Genetics 42:217–226Google Scholar