Castelnuovo-Mumford Regularity of Graphs

  • Türker Bıyıkoğlu
  • Yusuf Civan


We present new combinatorial results on the calculation of (Castelnuovo-Mumford) regularity of graphs. We introduce the notion of a prime graph over a field k, which we define to be a connected graph with regk(Gx) < regk(G) for any vertex xV (G). We then exhibit some structural properties of prime graphs. This enables us to provide upper bounds to the regularity involving the induced matching number im(G). We prove that reg(G) ≤ (Γ(G)+1)im(G) holds for any graph G, where Γ(G)=max{|N G [x]\N G [y]| : xyE(G)} is the maximum privacy degree of G and N G [x] is the closed neighbourhood of x in G. In the case of claw-free graphs, we verify that this bound can be strengthened by showing that reg(G)≤2im(G). By analysing the effect of Lozin transformations on graphs, we narrow the search for prime graphs into graphs having maximum degree at most three. We show that the regularity of such graphs G is bounded above by 2im(G)+1. Moreover, we prove that any non-trivial Lozin operation preserves the primeness of a graph. That enables us to generate many new prime graphs from the existing ones.

We prove that the inequality reg(G/e)≤reg(G)≤reg(G/e)+1 holds for the contraction of any edge e of a graph G. This implies that reg(H) ≤ reg(G) whenever H is an edge contraction minor of G.

Finally, we show that there exist connected graphs satisfying reg(G)=n and im(G)=k for any two integers nk ≥ 1. The proof is based on a result of Januszkiewicz and Świa̦tkowski on the existence of Gromov hyperbolic right angled Coxeter groups of arbitrarily large virtual cohomological dimension, accompanied with Lozin operations. In an opposite direction, we show that if G is a 2K2-free prime graph, then reg(G)≤(δ(G)+3)/2, where δ(G) is the minimum degree of G.

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

13F55 05E40 05C70 05C75 05C76 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    M. Adamaszek: Splittings of independence complexes and the powers of cycles, Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A 119 (2012), 1031–1047.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    D. Attali, A. Lieutier and D. Salinas: Effcient data structure for representing and simplifying simplicial complexes in high dimensions, International Journal of Computational Geometry and Applications 22 (2012), 279–303.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    T. Biyikoğlu and Y. Civan: Four-cycled graphs with topological applications, Annals of Combinatorics 16 (2012), 37–56.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    T. Biyikoğlu and Y. Civan: Bounding Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity of graphs via Lozin's operations, unpublished manuscript, available at arXiv:1302.3064, 2013.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    T. Biyikoğlu and Y. Civan: Vertex-decomposable graphs, codismantlability, Cohen-Macaulayness, and Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity, Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, 21(1):#P1, 2014.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    T. Biyikoğlu and Y. Civan: Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity of graphs, available at arXiv:1503.06018(v1), 43pp, 2015.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    A. Brandstädt, V. B. Le and J. P. Spinrad: Graph Classes, A Survey, SIAM Monographs on Discrete Mathematics and Applications, Philadelphia, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    P. Csorba: Subdivision yields Alexander duality on independence complexes, Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, 16(2):#R11, 2009.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    H. Dao, C. Huneke and J. Schweig: Bounds on the regularity and projective dimension of ideals associated to graphs, Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics 38 (2013), 37–55.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    R. Ehrenborg and G. Hetyei: The topology of the independence complex, European Journal of Combinatorics 27 (2006), 906–923.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    A. Engström: Complexes of directed trees and independence complexes, Discrete Mathematics 309 (2009), 3299–3309.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    A. Hatcher: Algebraic Topology, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2006.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    H. T. Hà: Regularity of squarefree monomial ideals, in: S. M. Cooper and S. Sather-Wagstaff, editors, Connections Between Algebra, Combinatorics, and Geometry, volume 76, 251–276. Springer, Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, 2014.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    H. T. Hà and A. V. Tuyl: Monomial ideals, edge ideals of hypergraphs, and their graded betti numbers, Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics 27 (2008), 215–245.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    T. Januszkiewicz and J. Świątkowski: Hyperbolic Coxeter groups of large dimension, Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici 78 (2003), 555–583.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    G. Kalai and R. Meshulam: Intersection of Leray complexes and regularity of monomial ideals, Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A 113 (2006), 1586–1592.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    M. Katzman: Characteristic-independence of Betti numbers of graph ideals, Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A 113 (2006), 435–454.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    D. Kozlov: Combinatorial Algebraic Topology, volume ACM 21, Springer, Berlin, 2008.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    V. V. Lozin: On maximum induced matchings in bipartite graphs, Information Processing Letters 81 (2002), 7–11.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    F. H. Lutz and E. Nevo: Stellar theory for flag complexes, Mathematica Scandinavica 118 (2016), 70–82.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    M. Mahmoudi, A. Mousivand, M. Crupi, G. Rinaldo, N. Terai and S. Yassemi: Vertex decomposability and regularity of very wellcovered graphs, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 215 (2011), 2473–2480.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    M. Marietti and D. Testa: A uniform approach to complexes arising from forests, Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, 15:#R101, 2008.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    D. Marušič and T. Pisanski: The remarkable generalized Petersen graph G(8; 3), Mathematica Slovaca 50 (2000), 117–121.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    S. Morey and R. H. Villarreal: Edge ideals: algebraic and combinatorial properties, in: C. Francisco, L. C. Klingler, S. Sather-Wagstaff, and J. C. Vassilev, editors, Progress in Commutative Algebra 1: Combinatorics and Homology, chapter 3, 85–126. De Gruyter, Berlin, 2012.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    E. Nevo: Regularity of edge ideals of C4-free graphs via the topology of the lcm-lattice, Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A 118 (2011), 491–501.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    E. Nevo and I. Peeva: C4-free edge ideals, Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics 37 (2013), 243–248.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    D. Osajda: A construction of hyperbolic Coxeter groups, Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici 88 (2013), 353–367.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    P. Przytycki and J. Świątkowski: Flag-no-square triangulations and Gromov boundaries in dimension 3, Groups, Geometry, and Dynamics 3 (2013), 453–468.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    R. P. Stanley: Combinatorics and Commutative Algebra, Second Edition, volume 41, Progress in Mathematics, Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 1996.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    W. A. Stein et al: Sage Mathematics Software, The Sage Development Team,, 2014.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    A. V. Tuyl: Sequentially Cohen-Macaulay bipartite graphs: vertex decomposability and regularity, Archiv der Mathematik 93 (2009), 451–459.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    D. W. Walkup: The lower bound conjecture for 3 and 4-manifolds, Acta Mathematica 125 (1970), 75–107.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    G. Weetman: A construction of locally homogeneous graphs, Journal of the London Mathematical Society 50 (1994), 68–86.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    G. Whieldon: Jump sequences of ideals, preprint, available at arXiv:1012.0108v1, 27pp, 2015.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    R. Woodroofe: Matchings, coverings, and Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity, Journal of Commutative Algebra 6 (2014), 287–304.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© János Bolyai Mathematical Society and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.AnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsSuleyman Demirel UniversityIspartaTurkey

Personalised recommendations