Skip to main content
Log in

Set Systems with few Disjoint Pairs

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Combinatorica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Let X = {1, . . . , n}, and let \( {\user1{A}} \) be a family of subsets of X. Given the size of \( {\user1{A}} \), at least how many pairs of elements of \( {\user1{A}} \) must be disjoint? In this paper we give a lower bound for the number of disjoint pairs in \( {\user1{A}} \). The bound we obtain is essentially best possible. In particular, we give a new proof of a result of Frankl and of Ahlswede, that if \( {\user1{A}} \) satisfies \( {\left| {\user1{A}} \right|} = {\left| {X^{{{\left( { \geqslant r} \right)}}} } \right|} \) then \( {\user1{A}} \) contains at least as many disjoint pairs as X (≥r).

The situation is rather different if we restrict our attention to \( {\user1{A}} \subset X^{{{\left( r \right)}}} \): then we are asking for the minimum number of edges spanned by a subset of the Kneser graph of given size. We make a conjecture on this lower bound, and disprove a related conjecture of Poljak and Tuza on the largest bipartite subgraph of the Kneser graph.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Béla Bollobás*.

Additional information

* Research partially supported by NSF grant DMS-9971788

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bollobás*, B., Leader, I. Set Systems with few Disjoint Pairs. Combinatorica 23, 559–570 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00493-003-0033-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00493-003-0033-0

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000):

Navigation