Abstract
Irrigation water requirements are commonly estimated based on the estimated crop evapotranspiration (ETc) as determined by the reference evapotranspiration (ETr) and crop coefficient (Kc). Recent studies show that, at high evaporative demand (high ETr), Kc tends to decrease, creating an inverse ETr-Kc relationship. The focus of this long-term study is to, if at high atmosphere demand, there is the same inverse ETr-Kc relationship in Nebraska, USA, one of the most intensely irrigated regions in the world, and as a result, propose an adjustment to the Kc–ETr approach. The study was carried out in eastern Nebraska for maize-soybean rotation fields for the period 2002–2012. The Kc was estimated based on energy balance data from eddy covariance flux towers installed in the field and a nearby automated weather station throughout the growing seasons. We found that average Kc values varied depending on the year under high ETr; measured ETc agreed reasonably well with the FAO-56 manual predicted values, but in years with high ETr such as 2012 and 2002 affecting ETc values over the growing season. It was observed that Kc decreased as ETr increased, mainly when ETr reaches values greater than 6 mm d−1 (P values < 0.001). This most likely was due to internal plant stomatal resistance to vapor release from the leaves diffusing to the atmosphere at high atmospheric demands. So, the time-based Kc curves described by FAO 56 manual should be adjusted for the analyzed crops considering different ranges of ETr to improve the required irrigation depth and irrigation management.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Data Availability
The data in this manuscript come from the AmeriFlux archive.
References
Allen RG (2000) Using the FAO-56 dual crop coefficient method over an irrigated region as part of an evapotranspiration intercomparison study. J Hydrol 229(1–2):27–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00194-8
Allen RG, Pereira LS (2009) Estimating crop coefficients from fraction of ground cover and height. Irrig Sci 28:17–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-009-0182-z
Allen RG, Pereira LS, Howell TA, Jensen ME (2011) Evapotranspiration information reporting: I. Factors governing measurement accuracy. Agric Water Manag 98:899–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.12.015
Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop requirements. Irrig. Drain. Pap. No. 56. FAO, Rome, Italy
Allen RG, Pruitt WO, Wright JL, Howell TA, Ventura F, Snyder R, Itenfisu D, Steduto P, Berengena J, Yrisarry JB, Smith M, Pereira LS, Raes D, Perrier A, Alves I, Walter I, Elliott R (2006) A recommendation on standardized surface resistance for hourly calculation of reference ETo by the FAO56 Penman–Monteith method. Agric Water Manage 81(1–2):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2005.03.007
ASCE-EWRI (2005) The ASCE standardized reference evapotranspiration equation. Technical committee report to the environmental and water resources institute of the American society of civil engineers from the task committee on standardization of reference evapotranspiration. ASCE-EWRI, 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Reston, VA, pp 20191–4400. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784408056
Boyer JS (1982) Plant productivity and environment. Science 218:443–448
Campos I, Neal CMU, Suyker A, Arkebauer TJ, Gonçalves IZ (2017) Reflectance based crop coefficients REDUX: for operational evapotranspiration estimates in the age of high producing hybrid varieties. Agric Water Manag 187:140–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.03.022
Ciais P, Reichstein M, Viovy N et al (2005) Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature 437:529–533
Ding R, Kang S, Li F, Zhang Y, Tong L, Sun Q (2010) Evaluating eddy covariance method by large-scale weighing lysimeter in a maize field of northwest China. Agric Water Manag 98:87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.08.001
Foster T, Goncalves IZ, Campos I, Neale CMU, Brozovic N (2019) Assessing landscape scale heterogeneity in irrigation water use with remote sensing and in situ monitoring. Environ Res Lett 14(2):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf2be
Franks PJ (2013) Passive and active stomatal control: either or both? New Phytol 198:325–327
Gonçalves IZ, Mekonnen MM, Neale CMU, Campos I, Neale MR (2020) Temporal and spatial variations of irrigation water use for commercial corn fields in Central Nebraska. Agric Water Manag 228:105
HPRCC (2020) Corn growing degree days tool. High Plans Regional Climate Center. https://hprcc.unl.edu/agroclimate/gdd.php. Accessed 13 June 2020
Kranz WL, Specht JE (2012) Irrigating soybean. NebGuide G1367. Available at https://extensionpublications.unl.edu/assets/pdf/g1367.pdf
Marin FR, Angelocci LR (2011) Irrigation requirements and transpiration coupling to the atmosphere of a citrus orchard in Southern Brazil. Agric Water Manag 98:1091–1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2011.02.002
Marin FR, Angelocci LR, Nassif DSP et al (2016) Crop coefficient changes with reference evapotranspiration for highly canopy-atmosphere coupled crops. Agric Water Manag 163:139–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.09.010
Marin FR, Angelocci LR, Nassif DSP et al (2019) Revisiting the crop coefficient–reference evapotranspiration procedure for improving irrigation management. Theor Appl Climatol 138:1785–1793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-019-02940-7
Marin FR, Angelocci LR, Righi EZ, Sentelhas PC (2005) Evapotranspiration and irrigation requirements of a coffee plantation in Southern Brazil. Exp Agric 41(02):187–197. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479704002480
Marin FR, Inman-Bamber G, Silva TGF, Nassif DFP, Carvalho KS (2020) Sugarcane evapotranspiration and irrigation requirements in tropical climates. Theor Appl Climatol 140:1349–1357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-020-03161-z
Nassif DSP, Marin FR, Costa LG (2014) Evapotranspiration and transpiration coupling to the atmosphere of sugarcane in southern Brazil: scaling up from leaf to field. Sugar Tech 16:250–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-013-0267-0
NDEQ (2018) 2018 Nebraska groundwater quality monitoring report. Nebraska department of environmental quality report. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=ndeq. Accessed 28 Aug 2021
NDNR (2021) Groundwater interactive map. Nebraska Department of Natural Resources. https://dnr.nebraska.gov/groundwater/groundwater-interactive-maps. Accessed 30 Aug 2022
Neild RE, Newman JE (1987) NCH-40 growing season characteristics and requirements in the corn belt. National Corn Handbook. Purdue University, Cooperative Extension Service. https://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/NCH/NCH-40.html
Neukam D, Böttcher U, Kage H (2016) Modelling wheat stomatal resistance in hourly time steps from micrometeorological variables and soil water status. J Agron Crop Sci 202:174–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12133
Payero JO, Irmak S (2013) Daily energy fluxes, evapotranspiration and crop coefficient of soybean. Agric Water Manag 129:31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2013.06.018
Peel MC, Finlayson BL, McMahon TA (2007) Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11:1633–1644. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007
Sobenko LR, Souza TT, Gonçalves AO, Bianchini VJM, Silva EHFM, Souza LT, Marin FR (2019) Irrigation requirements are lower than those usually prescribed for a maize crop in southern Brazil. Exp Agric 55(4):662–771. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479718000339
Stoy PC, Mauder M, Foken T et al (2013) A data-driven analysis of energy balance closure across FLUXNET research sites: the role of landscape scale heterogeneity. Agric Forest Meteorol 171–172:137–152
Suyker AE, Verma SB, Burba GG, Arkebauer TJ (2005) Gross primary production and ecosystem respiration of irrigated maize and irrigated soybean during a growing season Agric. Forest Meteorol 131:180–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.05.007
Suyker AE, Verma SB (2009) Evapotranspiration of irrigated and rainfed maize-soybean cropping systems. Agric for Meteorol 149:443–452
Tardieu F, Zhang J, Gowing DJG (1993) Stomatal control by both [ABA] in the xylem sap and leaf water status: a test of a model for draughted or ABA-fed field-grown maize. Plant Cell Environ 16:413–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1993.tb00887.x
Teare ID, Kanemasu ET (1972) Stomatal-diffusion resistance and water potential of soybean and sorghum leaves. New Phytol 71:805–810. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1972.tb01959.x
USDA (2018) United States Department of Agriculture. National Agricultural Statistics Service. https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/. Accessed 08 Mar 2019
U.S. Public Health Service (1962) Public Health Service Drinking Water Standards. Publ. 956 U.S. Dept. of Health. Education and Welfare. Public Health Service, Washington, D.C, pp 47–51. http://archive.org/details/gov.law.usphs.956.1962
Vinya R, Malhi Y, Fisher JB, Brown N, Brodribb T, Aragão LEOC (2013) Xylem cavitation vulnerability influences tree species’ habitat preferences in miombo woodlands. Oecologia 173:711–720
Young AR, Burbach ME, Howard LM, Lackey SO, Joeckel RM (2020) Nebraska statewide groundwater-level monitoring report. Nebraska water survey paper number 88, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska. http://snr.unl.edu/csd-esic/GWMapArchives/GWReports/GW_Level_Report_2020.pdf. Accessed 18 Apr 2021
Acknowledgements
The authors thank The Daugherty Water for Food Global Institute and Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources of the University of Nebraska for the scientific technical support and datasets, the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, grants 2020/08365-1 and 2021/00720-0) and the Brazilian Research Council (CNPq, grants 425174/2018-2, and 300916/2018-3) for the financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gonçalves, I.Z., Neale, C.M.U., Suyker, A. et al. Evapotranspiration adjustment for irrigated maize–soybean rotation systems in Nebraska, USA. Int J Biometeorol 67, 1869–1879 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-023-02547-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-023-02547-8