Advertisement

International Journal of Biometeorology

, Volume 61, Issue 12, pp 2033–2045 | Cite as

Macro- and microclimate conditions may alter grapevine deacclimation: variation in thermal amplitude in two contrasting wine regions from North and South America

  • Francisco Gonzalez Antivilo
  • Rosalía Cristina Paz
  • Markus Keller
  • Roberto Borgo
  • Jorge Tognetti
  • Fidel Roig Juñent
Original Paper

Abstract

Low temperature is a limiting factor that affects vineyard distribution globally. The level of cold hardiness acquired during the dormant season by Vitis sp. is crucial for winter survival. Most research published on this topic has been generated beyond 40° N latitude, where daily mean temperatures may attain injurious levels during the dormant season resulting in significant damage to vines and buds. Symptoms of cold injury have been identified in Mendoza (32–35° S latitude), a Southern Hemisphere wine region characterized by a high thermal amplitude, and warm winds during the dormant season. These symptoms have usually been attributed to drought and/or pathogens, but not to rapid deacclimation followed by injurious low temperatures. Because local information on meteorological events as probable causes is scarce, this research was designed to test and study this assumption by comparing macro-, meso-, and microclimatic data from Mendoza, Argentina, and eastern Washington, USA. The goal was to unveil why freezing damage has occurred in both regions, despite the existence of large climatic differences. Because environmental parameters under field conditions may not correspond to data recorded by conventional weather stations, sensors were installed in vineyards for comparison. Microclimatic conditions on grapevines were also evaluated to assess the most vulnerable portions of field-grown grapevines. In order to better understand if it may be possible to modify cold hardiness status in a short period with high thermal amplitude conditions, deacclimation was induced using a thermal treatment. Hence, despite the fact that Mendoza is warmer, and temperatures are not as extreme as in Washington, high daily thermal amplitude might be partially involved in plant deacclimation, leading to a differential cold hardiness response.

Keywords

Cold hardiness Deacclimation Thermal amplitude Grapevine Mendoza Washington state 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica, Argentina (ANPCyT), CONICET, and PRH 2007 (UNCuyo-AGENCIA). We thank the staff of the Vegetal Physiology Department and Biological Chemistry of Agronomy Faculty of UNCuyo Mendoza (especially Bruno Cavagnaro and Emiliano Malovini), Viticulture Laboratory of IAREC in Washington State (especially Lynn Mills, John Ferguson, and Allan Kawakami), Statistical Department of UNC Córdoba (especially Mónica Balzarini and Mariano Córdoba), INTA EEA Mendoza Ecophysiology and Viticulture Department (especially Jorge Perez Peña, Eugenia Galat Giorgi and Dante Gamboa), IANIGLA CCT-Mendoza (especially to Federico Gonzalez and Diego Araneo) for sharing their knowledge and technical support and to all the students that participated in our research.

Supplementary material

484_2017_1400_Fig6_ESM.gif (35 kb)
Supplementary Fig. 1

Meta analysis of 100 publications about cold hardiness in fruit trees around the world (GIF 35 kb)

484_2017_1400_MOESM1_ESM.tiff (7.3 mb)
High Resolution Image (TIFF 7436 kb)
484_2017_1400_Fig7_ESM.gif (8 kb)
Supplementary Fig. 2

Figure 2 Typical DTA profiles of low temperature exotherms (LTE), indicating lethal intracellular freezing, from two single TEM containing either five buds (lower plot) or two cane pieces (upper plot) of Malbec sampled on 23 Feb 2005, in Prosser, WA. High temperature exotherms (HTE), indicating nonlethal extracellular freezing, are shown to the right of the dashed -10°C line. © American Society for Enology and Viticulture. AJEV 57:194-200 (GIF 8 kb)

484_2017_1400_MOESM2_ESM.tiff (1.1 mb)
High Resolution Image (TIFF 1163 kb)

References

  1. Ancapichun S, Garcés-Vargas J (2015) Variability of the Southeast Pacific Subtropical Anticyclone and its impact on sea surface temperature off north-central Chile. Ciencias Mar 41:1–20. doi: 10.7773/cm.v41i1.2338 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews PK, Sandidge CR, Toyama TK (1984) Deep supercooling of dormant and deacclimating vitis buds. Am J Enol Vitic 35:175–177Google Scholar
  3. Battany M, Smith R, Tindula G, Snyder R (2012) Measuring springtime temperature inversion conditions for estimating the potential of wind machines for frost protection. Amer Soc Enology Viticulture 63(3):456A–456AGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernstein L, Bosch P, Canziani O, Chen Z, Christ R, Riahi K (2008) IPCC, 2007: climate change 2007: synthesis report. Geneva: IPCC. ISBN 2-9169-122-4Google Scholar
  5. Bianchi AR, Yáñez CE (1992) Las Precipitaciones en el Noroeste Argentino, 2nd edn. INTA EEA, SaltaGoogle Scholar
  6. Blennow K (1998) Modelling minimum air temperature in partially and clear felled forests. Agric For Meteorol 91(3):223–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brusky Odneal M (1983) Winter bud injury of grapevines 1981–1982. Fruit Varieties J 37(2):45–51Google Scholar
  8. Burgos J (2010) Las heladas en la Argentina. Minagri, 2nd edn. Ed. Orientación Gráfica, Buenos AiresGoogle Scholar
  9. Burrows A (1940) The Chinook wind. Or Hist Q 41(1):103–106Google Scholar
  10. Caretta A, Ortega A, Ortíz Maldonado A (2004) Probability of damage to vines, fruit and olive trees blossom by Zonda wind Mendoza, Argentina. Rev FCA UNCuyo 36:49–58Google Scholar
  11. Charrier G, Ameglio T (2011) The timing of leaf fall affects cold acclimation by interactions with air temperature through water and carbohydrate contents. Environ Exp Bot 72:351–357. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.12.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Charrier G, Ngao J, Saudreau M, Améglio T (2015) Effects of environmental factors and management practices on microclimate, winter physiology, and frost resistance in trees. Front Plant Sci 6:1–18. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00259 Google Scholar
  13. Cragin J, Serpe M, Keller M, Shellie K (2017) Dormancy and cold hardiness transitions in wine grape cultivars chardonnay and cabernet sauvignon. Am J Enol Vitic. doi: 10.5344/ajev.2016.16078
  14. Dambrorská M (1978) The effect of higher winter temperatures on changes of the frost resistance of grapevine buds. Vitis 17:341–349Google Scholar
  15. Di Rienzo JA, Guzman AW, Casanoves F (2002) A multiple-comparisons method based on the distribution of the root node distance of a binary tree. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 7:129–142. doi: 10.1198/10857110260141193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Di Rienzo, JA, Casanoves, F, Balzarini, MG, Gonzalez L, Tablada M, Robledo, CW (2016). InfoStat versión 2016. Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina. http://www.infostat.com.ar
  17. Eagles CF (1989) Temperature-induced changes in cold tolerance of Lolium perenne. J Agric Sci 113:339–347. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600070027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Easterling D, Meehl G, Parmesan C, Changnon S, Karl T, Mearns L (2000) Climate extremes: observations, modeling and impacts. Science 289(5487):2068–2074. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5487.2068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Echarte M, Angeloni P, Jaimes F, Tognetti J, Izquierdo N, Valentinuz O, Aguirrezába L (2010) Night temperature and intercepted solar radiation additively contribute to oleic acid percentage in sunflower oil. Field Crops Res 119(1):27–35. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.06.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fall S, Watts A, Nielsen-Gammon J, Jones E, Niyogi D, Christy J, Pielke R (2011) Analysis of the impacts of station exposure on the U.S. Historical Climatology Network temperatures and temperature trends. J Geophys Res 116:D14120. doi: 10.1029/2010JD015146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Farrell J (2010) Deacclimation response to winter temperature fluctuations in Lolium perenne. Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Paper 11831. Iowa State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  22. Fennell A (2004) Freezing tolerance and injury in grapevines. J Crop Improv 10(1–2):201–235. doi: 10.1300/J411v10n01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ferguson J, Moyer M, Mills J, Hoogenboom G, Keller M (2014) Modeling dormant bud cold hardiness and budbreak in twenty-three Vitis genotypes reveals variation by region of origin. Am J Enol Vitic 65(1):59–71. doi: 10.5344/ajev.2013.13098 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ferguson J, Tarara J, Mills L, Grove G, Keller M (2011) Dynamic thermal time model of cold hardiness for dormant grapevine buds. Ann Bot Lond 107(3):389–396. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcq263 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Friend AP, Trought MCT, Stushnoff C, Wells GH (2011) Effect of delaying budburst on shoot development and yield of Vitis vinifera L. Chardonnay ‘Mendoza’ after a spring freeze event. Aust J Grape Wine Res 17:378–382. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2011.00162.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fuchigami LH, Weiser CJ, Kobayashi KD, Timmis R, Gusta V (1982) A degree growth stage (GS) model and cold acclimation in temperate woody plants. In: Li PH, Sakai A (eds) Plant cold hardiness and freezing stress. II Plant acclimation. Academic Press, New York, pp 93–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gedalof ZE, Peterson DL, Mantua NJ (2005) Atmospheric, climatic, and ecological controls on extreme wildfire years in the northwestern United States. Ecol Appl 15(1):154–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Giantomasi M, Roig Junent F, Villagra P, Srur A (2009) Annual variation and influence of climate on the ring width and wood hydrosystem of Prosopis flexuosa DC trees using image analysis. Trees 23(1):117–126. doi: 10.1007/s00468-008-0260-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goffinet M (2004) Anatomy of grapevine winter injury and recover. Cornell University Department of Horticultural Sciences, NY State Agricultural Experiment Station, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  30. Gu L, Hanson P, Mac Post W, Kaiser D, Yang B, Nemani R, Meyers T (2008) The 2007 eastern US spring freeze: increased cold damage in a warming world. Bioscience 58(3):253–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gu S, Ding P, Howard S (2002) Effect of temperature and exposure time on cold hardiness of primary buds during the dormant season in ‘Concord’, ‘Norton’, ‘Vignoles’ and ‘St. Vincent’ grapevines. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 77:635–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gusta L, Wisniewski M (2013) Understanding plant cold hardiness: an opinion. Physiol Plant 147:4–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01611.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hamman RA, Dami IE, Walsh TM, Stushnoff C (1996) Seasonal carbohydrate changes and cold hardiness of Chardonnay and Riesling grapevines. Am J Enol Vitic 47:31–36Google Scholar
  34. Haynes CL, Lindstrom OM, Dirr MA (1992) Cooling and warming effects on cold hardiness estimations of three woody ornamental taxa. Hortscience 27(12):1308–1309Google Scholar
  35. Howell GS, Shaulis N (1980) Factors influencing within-vine variation in the cold resistance of cane and primary bud tissues. Am J Enol Vitic 31(2):158–161Google Scholar
  36. Hubackova M (1996) Dependence of grapevine bud cold hardiness on fluctuations in winter temperatures. Am J Enol Vitic 47:100–102Google Scholar
  37. Jiang H, Howell GS (2002) Correlation and regression analyses of cold hardiness, air temperatures, and water content of Concord grapevines. Am J Enol Vitic 53:227–230Google Scholar
  38. Jordan D, Smith W (1995) Microclimate factors influencing the frequency and duration of growth season frost for subalpine plants. Agric For Meteorol 77(1):17–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kalberera S, Wisniewski M, Arora R (2006) Deacclimation and reacclimation of cold-hardy plants: current understanding and emerging concepts. Plant Sci 171(1):3–16. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2006.02.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Keller M, Mills LJ (2007) Effect of pruning on recovery and productivity of cold-injured merlot grapevines. Am J Enol Vitic 58(3):351–357Google Scholar
  41. Leuning R, Cremer KW (1988) Leaf temperatures during radiation frost part I. Observations. Agric For Meteorol 42(2–3):121–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Levitt J (1980) Responses of plants to environmental stresses, Ed 2 edn. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Mass C, Dotson B (2010) Major extratropical cyclones of the Northwest United States: historical review, climatology, and synoptic environment. Mon Weather Rev 138(7):2499–2527. doi: 10.1175/2010MWR3213.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Paroschy JH, Meiering AG, Peterson RL, Hostetter G, Neff A (1980) Mechanical winter injury in grapevine trunks. Am J Enol Vitic 31(3):227–232Google Scholar
  45. Menne M, Williams C, Palecki M (2010) On the reliability of the U.S. surface temperature record. J Geophys Res 115:D11108. doi: 10.1029/2009JD013094 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mills LJ, Ferguson JC, Keller M (2006) Cold-hardiness evaluation of grapevine buds and cane tissues. Am J Enol Vitic 57:194–200Google Scholar
  47. Mullins MG, Bouquet A, Williams LE (1992) Biology of the grapevine. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  48. Norte F, Simonelli S (2016) Validation of a statistical forecast model for Zonda wind in West Argentina based on the vertical atmospheric structure. Atmos Clim Sci 6(1):35–50Google Scholar
  49. Okamoto G, Shippin W, Ken H (2000) Cold resistance in root and cane of own-root ‘Kyoho’ grapevines. Sci Rep Fac Agric Okayama Univ 89:23–29Google Scholar
  50. Pagter M, Arora R (2013) Winter survival and deacclimation of perennials under warming climate: physiological perspectives. Physiol Plant 147:75–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01650.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pagter M, Williams M (2011) Frost dehardening and rehardening of Hydrangea macrophylla stems and buds. Hortscience 46(8):1121–1126Google Scholar
  52. Proebsting EL, Ahmedullah M, Brummund V (1980) Seasonal changes in low temperature resistance of grape buds. Am J Enol Vitic 31:329–336Google Scholar
  53. Core Team R (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna http://www.R-project.org/ Google Scholar
  54. Renaud V, Rebetez M (2009) Comparison between open-site and below-canopy climatic conditions in Switzerland during the exceptionally hot summer of 2003. Agric For Meteorol 149(5):873–880. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.11.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Robinson J (2006) The Oxford companion to wine, 3rd edn. Press, Oxford UniversityGoogle Scholar
  56. Rubio S, Dantas D, Bressan-Smith R, Pérez F (2016) Relationship between endodormancy and cold hardiness in grapevine buds. J Plant Growth Regul 35(1):266–275. doi: 10.1007/s00344-015-9531-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sage R, Kubien D (2007) The temperature response of C3 and C4 photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ 30:1086–1106. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01682.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sakai A, Larcher W (1987) Frost survival of plants. Ecological Studies 62. Springer-Verlag, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Steffen K, Arora R, Palta J (1989) Relative sensitivity of photosynthesis and respiration to freeze-thaw stress in herbaceous species importance of realistic freeze-thaw protocols. Plant Physiol 89(4):1372–1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tarara JM, Hoheisel GA (2007) Low-cost shielding to minimize radiation errors of temperature sensors in the field. Hortscience 42(6):1372–1379Google Scholar
  61. Thompson K, Grime J, Mason G (1977) Seed germination in response to diurnal fluctuations of temperature. Nature 267(5607):147–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wample R, Wolf T (1996) Practical considerations that impact vine cold hardiness. In: Henick-Kling T, Wolf TE, Harkness EM (eds) Proc. 4th Intl. Symp.Cool Climate Viticulture and Enology. New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, pp 23–28Google Scholar
  63. Wisniewski M, Wolf T, Fuchigami L (1996) Biochemical and biophysical mechanisms of cold hardiness in woody plants. In: Henick-Kling T, Wolf TE, Harkness EM (eds) Proc. 4th Intl. Symp.Cool Climate Viticulture and Enology. New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, pp 14–22Google Scholar
  64. Wolf TK, Pool RM (1987) Factors affecting exotherm detection in the differential thermal analysis of grapevine dormant buds. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 112:520–525Google Scholar
  65. Wolf TK, Cook MK (1992) Seasonal deacclimation patterns of three grape cultivars at constant, warm temperature. Am J Enol Vitic 43:171–179Google Scholar
  66. WRCC (2013) Western Regional Climate Center, Cooperative Climatological Data Summaries http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/climatedata/climsum/ . Accessed 4 January 2017
  67. Xin Z, Browse J (2000) Cold comfort farm: the acclimation of plants to freezing temperatures. Plant Cell Environ 23:893–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zabadal TJ, Dami IE, Goffinet MC, Martinson T, Chien M (2007) Winter injury to grapevines and methods of protection. Mich State Univ Ext E2930:1–44. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2005.11.004 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ISB 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratorio de Dendrocronología e Historia AmbientalIANIGLA, CCT-CONICET-MendozaMendozaArgentina
  2. 2.CIGEOBIO (FCEFyN, UNSJ/CONICET)San JuanArgentina
  3. 3.Department of Horticulture, Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension CenterWashington State UniversityProsserUSA
  4. 4.Cátedra de Fisiología Vegetal, Facultad de Ciencias AgrariasUniversidad Nacional de CuyoMendozaArgentina
  5. 5.Laboratorio de Fisiología Vegetal—Facultad de Ciencias AgrariasUniversidad Nacional de Mar del PlataMar del PlataArgentina
  6. 6.Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations