International Journal of Biometeorology

, Volume 60, Issue 3, pp 411–420 | Cite as

The response of ecosystem carbon fluxes to LAI and environmental drivers in a maize crop grown in two contrasting seasons

  • Luca Vitale
  • Paul Di Tommasi
  • Guido D’Urso
  • Vincenzo Magliulo
Original Paper


The eddy correlation technique was used to investigate the influence of biophysical variables and crop phenological phases on the behaviour of ecosystem carbon fluxes of a maize crop, in two contrasting growing seasons. In 2009, the reduced water supply during the early growing stage limited leaf area expansion, thus negatively affecting canopy photosynthesis. The variability of gross primary production (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (R eco) was mainly explained by seasonal variation of leaf area index (LAI). The seasonal variation of R eco was positively influenced by soil temperatures (T soil) in 2008 but not in 2009. In 2008, a contribution of both autotrophic and heterotrophic components to total R eco could be hypothesized, while during 2009, autotrophic respiration is supposed to be the most important component. Crop phenological phases affected the response of ecosystem fluxes to biophysical drivers.


Ecosystem carbon fluxes Environmental factors Leaf area index (LAI) Maize crop Vegetative phase Reproductive phase 



This research was supported by the European Commission (Carboeurope IP project). Thanks are due to Dr. Lazzaro Iemma for his kind availability to host the work in his farm and Dr. Vincenzo Carbone for crop management and the useful assistance. The authors are thankful to Mrs Angela Balsamo and Mr Filippo Busiello (CNR-ISAFoM) for taking care of biometrical determinations.


  1. Aubinet M, Moureaux C, Bodson B, Dufranne D, Heinsesch B, Suleau M, Vancutsem F, Vilret A (2009) Carbon sequestration by a crop over a 4-years sugar beet/winter wheat/seed potato/winter wheat rotation cycle. Agric For Meteorol 149:407–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldocchi DD (1994) A comparative study of mass and energy exchange rates over a closed C3 (wheat) and an open C4 (corn) crop: II. CO2 exchange and water use efficiency. Agric For Meteorol 67:291–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldocchi DD, Hicks BB, Myers TP (1988) Measuring biosphere-atmosphere exchanges of biologically related gases with micrometeorological methods. Ecology 69:1331–1340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ceschia E, Béziat P, Dejoux JF, Aubinet M, Bernhofer C, Bodson B, Buchmann N, Carrara A, Cellier P et al (2010) Management effects on net ecosystem carbon and GHG budgets at European crop sites. Agric Ecosyst Environ 139:363–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ciais P, Wattenbach M, Vuichard N, Smith P, Piao SL, Don A, Luyssaert S, Janssens I, Bondeau A et al (2010) The European greenhouse gas balance revised. Part 2: cropland. Glob Chang Biol 16:1409–1428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. D’Urso G, Santini A (2001) Remote sensing of canopy variables for the application of hydrological models. In “Remote Sensing and Hydrology 2000”, IAHS Pubbl., Wallingford (UK), 267:476–480Google Scholar
  7. Davidson EA, Janssens IA, Luo YQ (2006) On the variability of respiration in terrestrial ecosystems: moving beyond Q10. Glob Chang Biol 12:154–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eugster W, Moffat AM, Ceschia E, Aubinet M, Ammann C, Osborne B, Davis PA, Smith P, Jacobs C et al (2010) Management effects on European cropland respiration. Agric Ecosyst Environ 139:346–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fu YL, Yu GR, Wang YF, Li ZQ, Hao YB (2006) Effects of water stress on ecosystem photosynthesis and respiration of a Leymus chinensis steppe in Inner Mongolia. Sci China Ser D 49:196–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fu YI, Zheng Z, Yu G, Hu Z, Sun X, Shi P, Wang Y, Zhao X (2009) Environmental influences on carbon dioxide fluxes over three grassland ecosystems in China. Biogeosciences 6:2879–2893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gervois S, Ciais P, de Noblet-Ducoudré N, Brisson N, Vuichards N, Viovy N (2008) Carbon and water balance of European croplands throughout the 20th century. Glob Biochem Cycles 22, GB2022Google Scholar
  12. Jans WW, Jabobs CMJ, Jam BK, Elbers JA, Barendse S, Moors E (2010) Carbon exchange of a maize (Zea mays L.) crop: influence of phenology. Agric Ecosyst Environ 139:316–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kolle O, Rebmann C (2007) Eddysoft-documentation of a software package to acquire and proces Eddy covariance data. Tech Rep Max Planck Inst Biogeochem 10:88Google Scholar
  14. Kutsch WL, Aubinet M, Buchman N, Smith P, Osborne B, Eugster W et al (2010) The net biome production of full crop rotations in Europe. Agric Ecosyst Environ 139:316–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lal R, Kimble JM, Follet RF, Cole CV (1998) The potential of U.S. cropland to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, p 442Google Scholar
  16. Lambers H, Chapin FS, Pons TL (2008) Plant Physiology Ecology, 2nd edn. Spring, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moors EJ, Jacobs C, Jans W, Supit I, Kutsch WL, Bernhofer C et al (2010) Variability in carbon exchange of European croplands. Agric Ecosyst Environ 139:325–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moureaux C, Debacq A, Hoyaux J, Suleau M, Tourneur D, Vancutsem F, Bodson B, Aubinet M (2008) Carbon balance assessment of a Belgian winter wheat crop (Tricum aestivum L.). Glob Chang Biol 14:1353–1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Qun D, Huizhi L (2013) Seven years of carbon dioxide exchange over a degraded grassland and a cropland with maize ecosystems in a semiarid area of China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 173:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Reichstein M, Falge E, Baldocchi D, Papale D, Aubinet M, Berbigier P, Bernhofer C, Buchmann N, Gilmanov T, Granier A et al (2005) On the separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and ecosystem respiration: review and improved algorithm. Glob Chang Biol 11:1424–1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ryan MG (1990) Growth and maintenance respiration in stems of pinus contorta and picea engelmannii. Can J For Res 20:48–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Smith P, Lanigan G, Kutsch WL, Buchmann N, Eugster W, Aubinet M et al (2010) Measurements necessary for assessing the net ecosystem carbon budget of croplands. Agric Ecosyst Environ 139:302–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stella P, Lamaud E, Brunet Y, Bonnefond JM, Loustau D, Irvine M (2009) Simultaneous measurements of CO2 and water exchange over three agroecosystems in South-West France. Biogeosciences 6:2957–2971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Suyker AE, Verma SB, Burba GG, Arkebauer TJ, Walters DT, Hubbard KG (2004) Growing season carbon dioxide exchange in irrigated and rainfed maize. Agric For Meteorol 124:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Suyker AE, Verma SB, Burba GG, Arkebauer TJ (2005) Gross primary production and ecosystem respiration of irrigated maize and irrigated soybean during growing season. Agric For Meteorol 131:180–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Verma SB, Dobermann A, Cassman KG, Walters DT, Knops JM, Arkebauer TJ, Suyker AE, Burba GG, Amos B, Yang H, Ginting D, Hubbard KG, Gitelson AA, Water-Shea EA (2005) Annual carbon dioxide exchange in irrigated and rainfed maize-based agroecosystems. Agric For Meteorol 131:77–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vitale L, Di Tommasi P, Arena C, Fierro A, Virzo De Santo A, Magliulo V (2007) Effects of water stress on gas exchange of field grown Zea mays L. in Southern Italy: an analysis at canopy and leaf level. Acta Physiol Plant 29:317–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vitale L, Di Tommasi P, Arena C, Riondino M, Forte A, Verlotta A, Fierro A, Virzo De Santo A, Fuggi A, Magliulo V (2009) Growth and gas exchange response to water shortage of a maize crop on different soil types. Acta Physiol Plant 31:331–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vitale L, Arena C, Carillo P, Di Tommasi P, Mesolella B, Nacca F, Virzo De Santo A, Fuggi A, Magliulo V (2011a) Gas exchange and leaf metabolism of irrigated maize at different growth stages. Plant Biosyst 145:485–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vitale L, Di Tommasi P, Arena C, Oliva M, Bertolini T, Ranucci S, Virzo De Santo A, Magliulo V (2011b) Ecosystem carbon fluxes of a ryegrass and clover fodder crop in a Mediterranean environment. Photosynthetica 49:330–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vleeshouwers LM, Verhagen A (2002) Carbon emission and sequestration by agricultural land use: a model for Europe. Glob Chang Biol 8:519–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vuolo F, Neugebauer N, Bolognesi SF, Atzberger C, D'Urso G (2013) Estimation of leaf area index using DEIMOS-1 data: application and transferability of a semi-empirical relationship between two agricultural areas. Remote Sens 5:1274–1291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wood S, Sebastian K, Scherr SR (2000) Pilot analysis of global ecosystems: agroecosystems. IFPRI, WRI, WashingtonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISB 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luca Vitale
    • 1
  • Paul Di Tommasi
    • 1
  • Guido D’Urso
    • 2
  • Vincenzo Magliulo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biology, Agriculture, and Food Science, Institute for Agricultural and Forest Systems in the Mediterranean (ISAFoM)National Research Council (CNR)ErcolanoItaly
  2. 2.Department of AgronomyUniversity of Naples Federico IIPorticiItaly

Personalised recommendations