Advertisement

International Journal of Biometeorology

, Volume 59, Issue 12, pp 1747–1759 | Cite as

Rubber yield prediction by meteorological conditions using mixed models and multi-model inference techniques

  • Reza Golbon
  • Joseph Ochieng Ogutu
  • Marc Cotter
  • Joachim Sauerborn
Original Paper

Abstract

Linear mixed models were developed and used to predict rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) yield based on meteorological conditions to which rubber trees had been exposed for periods ranging from 1 day to 2 months prior to tapping events. Predictors included a range of moving averages of meteorological covariates spanning different windows of time before the date of the tapping events. Serial autocorrelation in the latex yield measurements was accounted for using random effects and a spatial generalization of the autoregressive error covariance structure suited to data sampled at irregular time intervals. Information theoretics, specifically the Akaike information criterion (AIC), AIC corrected for small sample size (AICc), and Akaike weights, was used to select models with the greatest strength of support in the data from a set of competing candidate models. The predictive performance of the selected best model was evaluated using both leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) and an independent test set. Moving averages of precipitation, minimum and maximum temperature, and maximum relative humidity with a 30-day lead period were identified as the best yield predictors. Prediction accuracy expressed in terms of the percentage of predictions within a measurement error of 5 g for cross-validation and also for the test dataset was above 99 %.

Keywords

Hevea brasiliensis Yield Prediction Meteorological conditions Mixed models Multi-model inference 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was financed by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (project number 0330797A) and the Landesgraduiertenförderung Act (LGFG) of the Ministry for Science, Research and Art Baden-Württemberg. We deeply appreciate the tireless efforts of Mr. Ai Han-Jian and Mrs. Lai Han who helped at the preparation and data collection stages of this study. We specially thank the administration of NRWNNR and the rubber farmers of NaBan village for their kind support. We are grateful to three anonymous reviewers for constructive criticisms and insights that helped improve an earlier draft of this paper.

Integrity of research

Authors declare that the study complies with the current laws of the country in which it was performed

Supplementary material

484_2015_983_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (298 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 298 kb)

References

  1. Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csaki F (eds) 2nd international symposium on information theory. Akademia Kiado, Budapest, pp 267–281Google Scholar
  2. Bristow KL, Campbell GS (1984) On the relationship between incoming solar radiation and daily maximum and minimum temperature. Agric For Meteorol 31:159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretical approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, p 448Google Scholar
  4. Carr MKV (2012) The water relations of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis): a review. Exp Agric 48:176–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chairungsee N, Gay F, Thaler P, Kasemsap P, Thanisawanyangkura S, Chantuma A, Jourdan C (2013) Impact of tapping and soil water status on fine root dynamics in a rubber tree plantation in Thailand. Frontiers Plant Sci 4:538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clément-Demange A, Priyadarshan PM, Thuy Hoa TT, Venkatachalam P (2007) Hevea rubber breeding and genetics. In: Plant Breeding Reviews. Wiley, pp. 177–283Google Scholar
  7. FAOSTAT (2015) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://faostat3.fao.org/download/Q/QC/E. Accessed 3 Feb 2015
  8. Fox JM, Castella J (2013) Expansion of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) in mainland Southeast Asia: what are the prospects for smallholders? J Peasant Stud 40:155–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fox JM, Vogler JB, Sen OL, Giambelluca TW, Ziegler AD (2012) Simulating land-cover change in Montane mainland Southeast Asia. Environ Manage 49:968–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fox JM, Castella JC, Ziegler AD, Westley SB (2014) Rubber plantations expand in mountainous Southeast Asia: what are the consequences for the environment?. Asia Pacific Issues 114Google Scholar
  11. Gonkhamdee S, Maeght JL, Do F, Pierret A (2009) Growth dynamics of fine Hevea brasiliensis roots along a 4.5-m soil profile. Khon Kaen Agric J 37:265–276Google Scholar
  12. Gouvêa LRL, Silva GAP, Verardi CK, de Oliveira ALB, Gonçalves ECP, Scaloppi-Junior EJ, de Moraes MLT, de Souza GP (2013) Rubber tree early selection for yield stability in time and among locations. Euphytica 191:365–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guardiola-Claramonte M, Troch PA, Ziegler AD, Giambelluca TW, Vogler JB, Nullet MA (2008) Local hydrologic effects of introducing non-native vegetation in a tropical catchment. Ecohydrology 1:13–22Google Scholar
  14. Guardiola-Claramonte M, Troch PA, Ziegler AD, Giambelluca TW, Durcik M, Vogler JB, Nullet MA (2010) Hydrologic effects of the expansion of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) in a tropical catchment. Ecohydrology 3:306–314Google Scholar
  15. Gunasekera HKLK, De Costa WAJM, Nugawela A (2013) Canopy photosynthetic capacity and light response parameters of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) with reference to exploitation. Curr Agric Res J 1:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haridas G (1985) Streamflow measurements in a small watershed to estimate evaporation from a stand of rubber. In: Proceedings of International Rubber Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp 670–681Google Scholar
  17. Hora Júnior BT, de Macedo DM, Barreto RW, Evans HC, Mattos CRR, Maffia LA, Mizubuti ESG (2014) Erasing the past: a new identity for the Damoclean pathogen causing South American leaf blight of rubber. PLoS One 9(8):e104750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104750 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hurvich CM, Tsai CL (1989) Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76:297–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. IRSG (2015) Statistical summary of world rubber situation. http://www.rubberstudy.com/documents/WebSiteData_3.0b.pdf. Accessed 5 Feb 2015
  20. Jiang A (1988) Climate and natural production of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) in Xishuangbanna, southern part of Yunnan province, China. Int J Biometeorol 32:280–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kenward MG, Roger JH (1997) Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics 53:983–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kobayashi N, Kumagai T, Miyazawa Y, Matsumoto K, Tateishi M, Lim TK, Mudd RG, Ziegler AD, Giambelluca TW, Yin S (2014) Transpiration characteristics of a rubber plantation in central Cambodia. Tree Physiol 34:285–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kositsup B, Montpied P, Kasemsap P, Thaler P, Améglio T, Dreyer E (2009) Photosynthetic capacity and temperature responses of photosynthesis of rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis Müll. Arg.) acclimate to changes in ambient temperatures. Trees - Struct Funct 23:357–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li Z, Fox JM (2012) Mapping rubber tree growth in mainland Southeast Asia using time-series MODIS 250 m NDVI and statistical data. Appl Geogr 32:420–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu W, Li J, Lu H, Wang P, Luo Q, Liu W, Li H (2013) Vertical patterns of soil water acquisition by non-native rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis) in Xishuangbanna, southwest China. Ecohydrol 7:1234–1244Google Scholar
  26. Lotti C, Moreno RMB, Gonçalves PDS, Bhattacharya S, Mattoso LHC (2012) Extensional rheology of raw natural rubber from new clones of Hevea brasiliensis. Polym Eng Sci 52:139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Monteny BA, Barbier JM, Bernos CM (1985) Determination of the energy exchanges of forest type culture: Hevea brasiliensis. In: Hutchinson BA, Hicks BB (eds) Forest Atmospheric Interaction. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 211–233Google Scholar
  28. Ong SH, Othman R, Benong M (1998) Breeding and selection of clonal genotypes for climatic stress condition. In: Cronin ME (ed) Proceedings of the IRRDB Symposium. IRRDB, Hertford, pp 149–154Google Scholar
  29. Ortolani AA, Sentelhas PC, Camargo MBP, Pezzopane JEM, de Souza GP (1998) Agrometeorological model for seasonal rubber tree yield. Ind J Nat Rubber Res 11:8–14Google Scholar
  30. Priyadarshan PM (2011) Biology of Hevea rubber. Biology of Hevea Rubber:1–226Google Scholar
  31. Priyadarshan PM, Goncalves PDS (2003) Hevea gene pool for breeding. Genet Resour Crop Evol 50:101–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Priyadarshan PM, Hoa TTT, Huasun H, Gonçalves PDS (2005) Yielding potential of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) in sub-optimal environments. J Crop Improv 14:221–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pushparajah E (1983) Problems and potentials for establishing Hevea under difficult environmental conditions. Planter 59:242–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Raj S, Das G, Pothen J, Dey SK (2005) Relationship between latex yield of Hevea brasiliensis and antecedent environmental parameters. Int J Biometeorol 49:189–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rao P, Vijayakumar KR (1992) Climatic requirements. In: Sethuraj MR, Mathew NM (eds) Natural rubber: biology, cultivation and technology. Developments in crop science, 23. Elsevier, Netherlands, pp 200–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rao PS, Saraswathyamma CK, Sethuraj MR (1998) Studies on the relationship between yield and meteorological parameters of para rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis). Agric For Meteorol 90:235–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Renner SS (2007) Synchronous flowering linked to changes in solar radiation intensity. New Phytol 175:195-197Google Scholar
  38. Rivano F, Mattos CRR, Cardoso SEA, Martinez M, Cevallos V, Le Guen V, Garcia D (2013) Breeding Hevea brasiliensis for yield, growth and SALB resistance for high disease environments. Ind Crop Prod 44:659–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rodrigo VHL (2007) Ecophysiological factors underpinning productivity of Hevea brasiliensis. Braz J Plant Physiol 19:245–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. SAS (2011) SAS for Windows, version 9.3. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  41. Satheesan KV, Rao GG, Sethuraj MR, Raghavendra AS (1984) Canopy photosynthesis in rubber (Hevea brasiliensis): characteristics of leaves in relation to light interception. In: Sybesma C (ed). Springer, Netherlands, pp. 125–128Google Scholar
  42. Self SG, Liang KY (1987) Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood ratio tests under nonstandard conditions. J Am Stat Assoc 82:605–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Senevirathna AMWK, Stirling CM, Rodrigo VHL (2003) Growth, photosynthetic performance and shade adaptation of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) grown in natural shade. Tree Physiol 23:705–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shangphu L (1986) Judicious tapping with stimulation based on dynamic analysis of latex production. In: Pan Y, Zhao C (eds) Proceedings of the IRRDB Rubber Physiology and Exploitation Meeting. SCATC, Hainan, China, pp 230–239Google Scholar
  45. Shuochang A, Yagang G (1990) Exploration of the high yield physiological regulation of Hevea brasiliensis in Xishuangbanna. In: Proceedings of the IRRDB Symposium on Physiology and Exploitation of Hevea brasiliensis. IRRDB, Kunming, China, pp 83–92Google Scholar
  46. Silva JQ, Scaloppi Júnior EJ, Moreno RMB, de Souza GB, Gonçalves PDS, Filho JAS (2012) Yield and chemical properties of rubber of Hevea clones according to phenological stages. Pesq Agrop Brasileira 47:1066–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stone M (1974) Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 36(2):111–147, Series B (methodological)Google Scholar
  48. Stram DO, Lee JW (1994) Variance components testing in the longitudinal mixed effects model. Biometrics 50:1171–1177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Su X, Yan X, Tsai CL (2012) Linear regression. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat 4:275–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sugiura N (1978) Further analysts of the data by Akaike’s information criterion and the finite corrections. Commun Stat - Theory Methods 7:13–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Thornton PE, Hasenauer H, White MA (2000) Simultaneous estimation of daily solar radiation and humidity from observed temperature and precipitation: an application over complex terrain in Austria. Agric For Meteorol 104:255–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Verbeke G, Molenberghs G (2000) Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. Wolff M, Zhang L (2010) Soil classification in the Naban River Watershed National Nature Reserve. In: Langenberger G (ed) LILAC publications, vol. 1. GRIN, Munich, p 60Google Scholar
  54. Wolfinger R (1993) Covariance structure selection in general mixed models. Commun Stat - Simul Comput 22:1079–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Xu J, Grumbine RE, Beckschäfer P (2014) Landscape transformation through the use of ecological and socioeconomic indicators in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China, Mekong Region. Ecol Ind 36:749–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yeang H (2007) Synchronous flowering of the rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) induced by high solar radiation intensity. New Phytol 175:283-289Google Scholar
  57. Yu H, Hammond J, Ling S, Zhou S, Mortimer PE, Xu J (2014) Greater diurnal temperature difference, an overlooked but important climatic driver of rubber yield. Ind Crop Prod 62:14–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISB 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reza Golbon
    • 1
  • Joseph Ochieng Ogutu
    • 2
  • Marc Cotter
    • 1
  • Joachim Sauerborn
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Plant Production and Agroecology in the Tropics and SubtropicsUniversity of HohenheimStuttgartGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Crop ScienceUniversity of HohenheimStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations