Skip to main content

Effects of shading on spike differentiation and grain yield formation of summer maize in the field

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to study the effects of shading on tassel and ear development and yield formation of three summer maize hybrids Zhenjie 2 (ZJ2), Denghai 605 (DH605), and Zhengdan 958 (ZD958). The ambient sunlight treatment was used as control (CK) and shading treatments (40 % of ambient sunlight) were applied at different growth stages from silking stage (R1) to physiological maturity stage (R6) (treatment S1), from the sixth extended leaf stage (V6) to R1 (treatment S2) and from seeding to R6 (treatment S3). Shading had no significant effect on the time from seeding to shoot emergence (VE); however, subsequent growth and development were delayed with shading beyond this point. The differentiation time of both tassel and ear delayed, and female spike (tassel) floret differentiation, sexual organ formation time, and anthesis-silking interval (ASI) were lengthened. After shading, the total number of floret, silk, and fertilization floret reduced significantly; the number of abortive seeds increased, and the total setting percentage among different treatments showed that CK>S2>S1>S3; and the total setting percentages in S1, S2, and S3 of ZD958 were 44, 72, and 15 % respectively. The total floret number of tassel primordium differentiation, fertility rate, and seed setting rate of florets in S3 treatment was the minimum; kernels per ear decreased seriously and single ear setting percentage was only 16 %; although floret degeneration number of S2 during ear differentiation stages increased and floret fertility rate reduced than that of CK, fertilization flower seed production increased and abortive seed decreased after canceling shading. Aborted kernel of S1 increased and kernel dry weight reduced, resulting in a significant decrease of kernel number per ear and kernel weight, and the grain abortive rate of 40–62 %. In conclusion, shading changed the growth and development process and caused infertility of tassel and ear; tassel branches decreased, reducing pollen vitality and silks differentiation cut down; and grain dry matter accumulation and setting percentage decreased, causing yield reduction. Grain yield and biomass reduced 66, 36, and 93 % compared to the control by shading treatments of S1, S2, and S3, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Abbreviations

VE:

Shoot emergence

V6:

The sixth extended leaf stage

V12:

The twelfth extended leaf stage

VT:

Tasseling stage

R1:

Silking stage

R6:

Physiological maturity stage

CK:

Control

S1:

Shading from R1 to R6

S2:

Shading from V6 to R1

S3:

Shading from seedling to R6

ASI:

Anthesis-silking interval

References

  • Allison JCS, Wilson JH, Williams JH (1975) Effect of partial defoliation during the vegetative phase on subsequent growth and grain yield of maize. Ann Appl Biol 81:367–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker NR, Long SP (1988) Photosynthesis and temperature, with particular reference to effects on quantum yield. Paper presented at the Plants and Temperature: Society for Experimental Biology Symposium No XXXXII

  • Banziger M, Edmeades GO, Lafitte HR (1999) Selection for drought tolerance increase maize yields across a range of nitrogen levels. Crop Sci 39:1035–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassetti P, Westgate ME (1993a) Emergence, elongation, and senescence of maize silks. Crop Sci 33:271–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassetti P, Westgate ME (1993b) Senescence and receptivity of maize silks. Crop Sci 33:275–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellasio C, Griffiths H (2014a) Acclimation to low light by C4 maize: implications for bundle sheath leakiness. Plant Cell Environ 37:1046–1058

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellasio C, Griffiths H (2014b) Acclimation of C4 metabolism to low light in mature maize leaves could limit energetic losses during progressive shading in a crop canopy. J Exp Bot 13:3725–3736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buren LL, Mock JJ, Anderson IC (1974) Morphological and physiological traits in maize associated with tolerance to high plant density. Crop Sci 14:426–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cárcova J, Uribelarrea M, Borrás L, Otegui ME, Westgate ME (2000) Synchronous pollination within and between ears improves kernel set in maize. Crop Sci 40:1056–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen HZ, Shi GY, Zhang XY, Arimoto R, Zhao JQ, Xu L, Wang B, Chen ZH (2005) Analysis of 40 years of solar radiation data from China, 1961–2000. Geophys Res Lett 32:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui HY, Zhang JW, Jin LB, Li B, Zhao B, Dong ST, Liu P (2012) Effects of shading on stalk morphology, structure and lodging of summer maize in field (in Chinese with English abstract). Sci Agric Sin 17:3497–3505

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui HY, Jin LB, Li B, Dong ST, Liu P, Zhao B, Zhang JW (2013) Effects of shading on dry matter accumulation and nutrient absorption of summer maize (in Chinese with English abstract). Chin J Appl Ecol 11:3099–3105

    Google Scholar 

  • Duvick DN (2005) The contribution of breeding to yield advances in maize (Zea mays L.). Adv Agron 86:83–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earley EB, McIlrath WO, Seif RD, Hageman RH (1967) Effects of shade applied at different stages of plant development on corn (Zea mays L.) production. Crop Sci 7:151–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmeades GO, Bolanos J, Hernandez M (1993) Causes for silk delay in a lowland tropical maize population. Crop Sci 33:1029–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehleringer J, Pearcy RW (1983) Variation in quantum yield for CO2 uptake among C3 and C4 plants. Plant Physiol 73:555–559

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis CA, Temple SR, Flor CA, Grogan CO (1978) Effects of competition on yield and dry matter distribution in maize. Field Crop Res 1:51–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerakis PA, Papkosta-Tasopoulou D (1980) Effects of dense planting and artificial shading on five maize hybrids. Agric Meteorol 21:129–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi-Dezfouli A, Herbert SJ (1992) Intensifying plant density response of corn with artificial shade. Agron J 84:547–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs BC, Pearson CJ (1991) Potential yield of maize, determined by rates of growth and development of ears. Field Crop Res 3:281–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia SF, Li CF, Dong ST, Zhang JW (2011) Effects of shading at different stages after anthesis on maize grain weight and quality at cytology level. Sci Agric Sin 1:58–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiniry JR, Ritchie JT (1985) Shade-sensitive interval of kernel number of maize. Agron J 77:711–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kromdijk J, Schepers HE, Albanito F, Fitton N, Carroll F, Jones MB, Finnan J, Lanigan GJ, Griffiths H (2008) Bundle sheath leakiness and light limitation during C4 leaf and canopy CO2 uptake. Plant Physiol 148:2144–2155

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li CD, Cao WX, Zhang YC (2002) Comprehensive pattern of primordium initiation in shoot apex of wheat (in Chinese with English abstract). Acta Bot Sin 44:273–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Li CH, Luan LM, Yin F, Wang Q, Zhao YL (2005) Effects of light stress at different stages on the growth and yield of different maize genotypes (Zea mays L.) (in Chinese with English abstract). Acta Ecol Sin 25:824–830

    Google Scholar 

  • Li CQ, Zheng HM, Li Y, Li CH (2010) Effect of planting density on the yield and development of maize ears (in Chinese with English abstract). Sci Agric Sin 43:2435–2442

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbewe DMN, Hunter RB (1986) The effect of shade stress on the performance of corn for silage versus grain. Can J Plant Sci 66:53–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otegui ME (1995) Prolificacy and grain yield components in modern Argentinian maize hybrids. Maydica 40:371–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Otegui ME, Melon S (1997) Kernel set and flower synchrony within the ear of maize. I. Sowing date effects. Crop Sci 37:441–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearcy RW, Ehleringer J (1984) Comparative ecophysiology of C3 and C4 plants. Plant Cell Environ 7:1–13

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed AJ, Singletary GW, Schussler JR, Williamson DR, Christy AL (1988) Shading effects on dry matter and nitrogen partitioning, kernel number, and yield of maize. Crop Sci 28:819–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarquís JI, Gonzalez H, Dunlap JR (1998) Yield response of two cycles of selection from a semiprolific early maize (Zea mays L.) population to plant density, sucrose infusion, and pollination control. Field Crop Res 55:109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun W, Ubierna N, Ma JY, Cousins AB (2012) The influence of light quality on C4 photosynthesis under steady-state conditions in Zea mays and Miscanthus × giganteus: changes in rates of photosynthesis but not the efficiency of the CO2 concentrating mechanism. Plant Cell Environ 5:982–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tollenaar M, Daynard TB (1978a) Dry weight, soluble sugar content, and starch content of maize kernels during the early post-silking period. Can J Plant Sci 58:199–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tollenaar M, Daynard TB (1978b) Kernel growth and development at two positions on the ear of maize (Zea mays L.). Can J Plant Sci 58:189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ubierna N, Sun W, Cousins AB (2011) The efficiency of C4 photosynthesis under low light conditions: assumptions and calculations with CO2 isotope discrimination. J Exp Bot 9:3119–3134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ubierna N, Sun W, Kramer DM, Cousins AB (2013) The efficiency of C4 photosynthesis under low light conditions in Zea mays, Miscanthus × giganteus and Flaveria bidentis. Plant Cell Environ 36:365–381

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZX (1999) Shandong maize production. Chinese Agricultural Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZX, Gao XZ, Xu JF, Liu YJ, Luo YN (1986) A study on the grain abortion of maize (Zea mays L.) (in Chinese with English abstract). Sci Agric Sin 6:36–40

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu ZQ (1991) Study on the production of light and temperature potential of summer maize (in Chinese with English abstract). Hebei Crop Res 3:21–22

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JW, Dong ST, Wang KJ, Hu CH, Liu P (2006) Effects of shading on the growth, development and grain yield of summer maize (in Chinese with English abstract). Chin J Appl Ecol 17:657–662

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao JR, Chen GP (1990) Effect of shading treatment at different stages of plant development on grain production of corn (Zea mays L.) and observations of tip kernel abortion (in Chinese with English abstract). Sci Agric Sin 23:28–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong XM, Shi ZS, Li FH, Huang HJ, Li HY (2013) Effects of light intensity on ear differentiation of barren-stalk defective maize. Adv Mater Res 731:4864–4869

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the financial supports from the National Basic Research Program of China (973, Program, 2015CB150404), Chinese National Natural Science Funds (31271662), and Shandong Modern Agricultural Technology & Industry System (SDAIT-01-022-05).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiwang Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cui, H., Camberato, J.J., Jin, L. et al. Effects of shading on spike differentiation and grain yield formation of summer maize in the field. Int J Biometeorol 59, 1189–1200 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-014-0930-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-014-0930-5

Keywords

  • Summer maize
  • Shading in field
  • Ear and tassel differentiation
  • Grain yield