Advertisement

International Journal of Biometeorology

, Volume 58, Issue 10, pp 2165–2168 | Cite as

Effect of four different reflective barriers on black-globe temperatures in calf hutches

  • T. H. FriendEmail author
  • J. A. Haberman
  • W. R. Binion
Short Communication

Abstract

Polyethylene hutches are a popular method of housing dairy calves from 0 to 60 or more days of age, although these hutches get hot when in full sun. This study characterized the relative differences in the ability of four different types of radiant barriers to reduce black-globe temperature within these hutches. Treatments included three different types of covers (two types of laminates (Cadpak P and Cadpak ESD) and an aluminized 3.0-mil white low-density polyethylene (LDPE)) and a reflective paint (LO/MIT-1). The reflective covers were 1.8 × 3 m finished size, and covered the top and sides of the hutch down to 0.15 m above the ground, leaving the front and back exposed. The LO/MIT-1 paint covered the entire sides and roof of the hutch. Two 24-h trials 1 week apart were conducted during relatively hot and clear days in early August. Black-globe temperatures were recorded in duplicate and averaged at 20-min intervals using blackened table tennis balls mounted 0.3 m above the floor in the center of each hutch. Ambient temperature (shade) during the hottest 2-h period for both trials averaged 39.9 °C while the uncovered control averaged 41.1 °C, and LO/MIT-1 averaged 39.9 °C; both of which were significantly higher (P < 0.01) than the Cadpak P (38.9 °C), Cadpak ESD (38.6 °C), and aluminized LDPE (38.7 °C). During periods of high solar radiation, the hutches with covers had lowest black-globe temperatures followed by hutches painted with reflective paint, while control hutches had the highest temperature.

Keywords

Calf Radiation Insulation Hutch 

References

  1. Auliciems A, Szokolay SV (2007) Design tools and techniques: thermal comfort. Passive and low energy architecture international. Univ. Queensland, Brisbane, p 21Google Scholar
  2. Binion WR, Friend TH, Holub GA (2014) Usefulness of an aluminized polyester film for reducing heat in polyethylene calf hutches. Int J Biometeorol. doi: 10.1007/s00484-013-0783-3 Google Scholar
  3. Carter BH, Garey SM, Friend TH, Sawyer JA, Alexander MB, Tomaszewski MA (2013) Efficacy of reflective insulation in reducing heat stress on dairy calves housed in polyethylene calf hutches. Int J Biometeorol. doi: 10.1007/s00484-012-0623-x Google Scholar
  4. Coleman DA, Moss BR, McCaskey TA (1996) Supplemental shade for dairy calves reared in commercial calf hutches in a southern climate. J Dairy Sci 79:2038–2043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Pereira N, Bond TE, Morrison SR (1967) “Ping pong” ball into black globe thermometer. Agric Eng 48:341–345Google Scholar
  6. Spain JN, Spiers DE (1996) Effects of supplemental shade on thermoregulatory response of calves to heat challenge in a hutch environment. J Dairy Sci 79:639–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISB 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Animal ScienceTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations