Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Estimating climate change, CO2 and technology development effects on wheat yield in northeast Iran

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Biometeorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wheat is the main food for the majority of Iran’s population. Precise estimation of wheat yield change in future is essential for any possible revision of management strategies. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of climate change, CO2 concentration, technology development and their integrated effects on wheat production under future climate change. This study was performed under two scenarios of the IPCC Special Report on Emission Scenarios (SRES): regional economic (A2) and global environmental (B1). Crop production was projected for three future time periods (2020, 2050 and 2080) in comparison with a baseline year (2005) for Khorasan province located in the northeast of Iran. Four study locations in the study area included Mashhad, Birjand, Bojnourd and Sabzevar. The effect of technology development was calculated by fitting a regression equation between the observed wheat yields against historical years considering yield potential increase and yield gap reduction as technology development. Yield relative increase per unit change of CO2 concentration (1 ppm−1) was considered 0.05 % and was used to implement the effect of elevated CO2. The HadCM3 general circulation model along with the CSM-CERES-Wheat crop model were used to project climate change effects on wheat crop yield. Our results illustrate that, among all the factors considered, technology development provided the highest impact on wheat yield change. Highest wheat yield increase across all locations and time periods was obtained under the A2 scenario. Among study locations, Mashhad showed the highest change in wheat yield. Yield change compared to baseline ranged from −28 % to 56 % when the integration of all factors was considered across all locations. It seems that achieving higher yield of wheat in future may be expected in northeast Iran assuming stable improvements in production technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amthor JS (1998) Perspective on the relative insignificance of increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration to crop yield. Field Crops Res 58:109–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amthor JS (2001) Effects of atmospheric CO2 concentration on wheat yield: review of results from experiments using various approaches to control CO2 concentration. Field Crops Res 73:1–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin RB (1999) Yield of wheat in the United Kingdom: recent advances and prospects. Crop Sci 39:1604–1610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannayan M, Hoogenboom G (2008) Weather analogue: a tool for real-time prediction of daily weather data realizations based on a modified k-nearest neighbor approach. Environ Model Softw 3:703–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannayan M, Crout NMJ, Hoogenboom G (2003) Application of the CERES-wheat model for within–season prediction of wheat yield in United Kingdom. Agron J 95:114–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannayan M, Kobayashi K, Kim HY, Liffering M, Okada M, Miura S (2005) Modelling the interactive effects of CO2 and N on rice production performance. Field Crops Res 14:237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannayan M, Tojo Soler CM, Garcia y Garcia A, Guerra LC, Hoogenboom G (2009) Interactive effects of elevated [CO2] and temperature on growth and development of a short- and long-season peanut cultivar. Clim Change 96:389–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannayan M, Lotfabadi S, Sanjani S, Mohammadian A, Agaalikhani M (2010) Effects of precipitation and temperature on cereal yield variability in northeast of Iran. Int J Biometeorol 55:387–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borlaug NE (2000) Ending world hunger. The promise of biotechnology and the threat of antiscience zealotry. Plant Physiol 124:487–490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Challinor AJ, Wheeler TR, Craufurd PQ, Slingo JM (2005) Simulation of the impact of high temperature stress on annual crop yields. Agric For Meteorol 135:180–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chartzoulakis K, Psarras G (2005) Global change effects on crop photosynthesis and production in Mediterranean: the case of Crete, Greece. Agric Ecosyst Environ 106:147–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conover WJ (1980) Practical nonparametric statistics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox PM, Betts RA, Jones CD, Spall SA, Totterdell IJ (2000) Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model. Nature 408:184–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Costa WAJM, Weerakoon WMW, Herath HMLK, Amaratunga KSP, Abeywardena RMI (2006) Physiology of yield determination of rice under elevated carbon dioxide at high temperatures in a subhumid tropical climate. Field Crops Res 96:336–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etheridge DM, Steele LP, Langenfelds R, Francey RJ, Barnola JM, Morgan V (1996) Natural and anthropogenic changes in atmospheric CO2 over the last 1000 years from air in Antarctic ice and firn. J Geophys Res 101:4115–4128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evans LT (1997) Adapting and improving crops: the endless task. Phil Trans R Soc Lond Biol Sci 352:901–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewert F, Rounsevell MDA, Reginster I, Metzger MJ, Leemans R (2005) Future scenarios of European agricultural land use I. Estimating changes in crop productivity. Agric Ecosyst Environ 107:101–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyshi Rezaie E, Bannayan M (2012) Rainfed wheat yields under climate change in northeastern Iran. Meteorol Appl 19:346–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi F, Bi XQ (2005) Updated regional precipitation and temperature changes for the 21st century from ensamples of recent AOGCM simulations. Geophys Res Lett 32:L21715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon C, Cooper C, Seinor CA, Banks H, Gregory JM, Johns TG, Mitchell JFB, Wood RA (2000) The simulation of SST, seas ice extents and ocean heat transports in a version of the Hadley Center coupled model without flux adjustment. Clim Dyn 16:147–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Yu Y, Zhang W, Sun W, Liu S, Jiang J, Wu J, Yu W, Yang Z (2009) Agro-C: a biogeophysical model for simulating the carbon budget of agroecosystems. Agric For Meteorol 149:106–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain SS, Mudasser M (2007) Prospects for wheat production under changing climate in mountain areas of Pakistan—an econometric analysis. Agric Syst 94:494–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IMAGE-team (2001) The IMAGE 2.2 implementation of the SRES scenarios: A comprehensive analysis of emissions, climate change and impacts in the 21st century. National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands

  • IMO (2009) Tehran. http://www.irimo.ir/farsi/amar/map/index.asp. Accessed 20 December 2009

  • IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of working group I to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Jones JW, Hoogenboom G, Porter CH, Boote KJ, Batchelor WD, Hunt LA, Wilkens PW, Singh U, Gijsman AJ, Ritchie JT (2003) The DSSAT cropping system model. Eur J Agron 18:235–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeling CD, Whorf TP (2000) Atmospheric CO2 records from the SIO air sampling network. In: Trends: A compendium of data on global change. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN

  • Khan MS, Coulibaly P, Dibike Y (2006) Uncertainty analysis of statistical downscaling methods. J Hydrol 319:357–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khorasan Ministry of Agricultural Statistics (2008) Statistics of agricultural products in Khorasan province. http://www.koaj.ir/. Accessed 3 November 2010

  • Koocheki A, Azemzade M (1999) Effects of different levels of phosphorus and planting densities on wheat in Khorasan province conditions. Agric Sci Ind 13:131–139 (Abstract in English)

    Google Scholar 

  • Koocheki A, Nassiri M (2008) Impacts of climate change and CO2 concentration on wheat yield in Iran and adaptation strategies. Iranian J Field Crops Res 6:139–153 (Abstract in English)

    Google Scholar 

  • Koocheki A, Nassiri M, Sharifi HR, Soltani A, Kamali GA, Rezvani-Moghaddam P (2003) Simulation of changes in climatic parameters of Iran under doubled CO2 concentration using general circulation models. Desert 8:178–190 (Abstract in English)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawlor DW, Mitchell RAC (1991) The effects of increasing CO2 on crop photosynthesis and productivity: a review of field studies. Plant Cell Environ 14:807–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis RS, Amthor JS (1999) Yield potential, plant assimilatory capacity, and metabolic efficiencies. Crop Sci 39:1584–1596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miflin B (2000) Crop improvement in the 21st century. J Exp Bot 51:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JFB, Johns TC, Gregory JM, Tett S (1995) Climate response to increasing levels of greenhouse gases as sulphate aerosols. Nature 376:501–504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I: a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassiri M, Koocheki A (2010a) Agroecological zoning of wheat in Khorasan provinces: estimating yield potential and yield gap. Iranian J Field Crops Res 7:695–709 (Abstract in English)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassiri M, Koocheki A (2010b) Agroecological zoning of wheat in Khorasan provinces: risk analysis. Iranian J Field Crops Res 8:297–308 (Abstract in English)

    Google Scholar 

  • Oerke EC, Dehne HW (1997) Global crop production and the efficacy of crop protection-current situation and future trends. Eur J Plant Pathol 103:203–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palosuo T, Kersebaum KC, Angulo C, Hlavinka P, Moriondo M, Olesen JE, Patil RH, Ruget F, Rumbaur C, Takac J, Trnka M, Bindi M, Caldag B, Ewert F, Ferrise R, Mirschel W, Saylan L, Siska B, Rotter R (2011) Simulation of winter wheat yield and its variability in different climates of Europe: a comparison of eight crop growth models. Eur J Agron 35:103–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry M, Rosenzweig C, Inglesias A, Fischer G, Livermore M (1999) Climate change and world food security: a new assessment. Glob Environ Chang 9:S51–S67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry M, Rosenzweig C, Inglesias A, Livermore M, Gischer G (2004) Effects of climate change on global food production under SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios. Glob Environ Chang 14:53–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pecetti L, Hollington PA (1997) Application of the CERES-Wheat simulation model to durum wheat in two diverse mediterranean environments. Eur J Agron 6:125–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prudhomme C, Wilby RL, Crooks S, Kay AL, Reynard NS (2010) Scenario-neutral approach to climate change impact studies: application to flood risk. J Hydrol 390:198–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds MP, Rajaram S, Sayre KD (1999) Physiological and genetic changes of irrigated wheat in the post-green revolution period and approaches for meeting projected global demand. Crop Sci 39:1611–1621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldi M (2004) Water availability at sowing and nitrogen management of durum wheat: a seasonal analysis with the CERES-Wheat model. Field Crops Res 89:27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semenov MK, Brooks RJ (1999) Spatial interpolation of the LARS-WG stochastic weather generator in Great Britain. Clim Res 11:137–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semenov MK, Stratonovitch A (2010) Use of multi-model ensembles from global climate models for assessment of climate change impacts. Clim Res 41:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharifi HR, Rahimian Mashhadi H (2001) Effects of drought stress, density and cultivar on wheat in Khorasan province situations. Agric Sci Nat Resour 8:115–130 (Abstract in English)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tubiello FN, Ewert F (2002) Simulating the effects of elevated CO2 on crops: approaches and applications for climate change. Eur J Agron 18(1–2):57–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetterhall F, Bardossy A, Chen D, Halldin S, Ch XU (2009) Statistical downscaling of daily precipitation over Sweden using GCM output. Theor Appl Climatol 96:95–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang JC, Zhang JH (2006) Grain filling of cereals under soil drying. New Phytol 169:223–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon ST, Hoogenboom G, Bannayan M (2009) Growth and development of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in response to CO2 enrichment under two different temperature regimes. Environ Exp Bot 67(1):178–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zarea A, Koocheki A, Nassiri M (2006) Trend analysis of yield, production and cultivated area of cereal in Iran during the last 50 years and prediction of future situation. Iranian J Field Crops Res 4:49–69 (Abstract in English)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Bannayan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bannayan, M., Mansoori, H. & Rezaei, E.E. Estimating climate change, CO2 and technology development effects on wheat yield in northeast Iran. Int J Biometeorol 58, 395–405 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-013-0635-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-013-0635-1

Keywords

Navigation