International Journal of Biometeorology

, Volume 57, Issue 5, pp 749–758 | Cite as

Multiple phenological responses to climate change among 42 plant species in Xi’an, China

Original Paper

Abstract

Phenological data of 42 woody plants in a temperate deciduous forest from the Chinese Phenological Observation Network (CPON) and the corresponding meteorological data from 1963 to 2011 in Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, China were collected and analyzed. The first leaf date (FLD), leaf coloring date (LCD) and first flower date (FFD) are revealed as strong biological signals of climatic change. The FLD, LCD and FFD of most species are sensitive to average temperature during a certain period before phenophase onset. Regional precipitation also has a significant impact on phenophases of about half of the species investigated. Affected by climate change, the FLD and FFD of these species have advanced by 5.54 days and 10.20 days on average during 2003–2011 compared with the period 1963–1996, respectively. Meanwhile, the LCD has delayed by 10.59 days, and growing season length has extended 16.13 days. Diverse responses of phenology commonly exist among different species and functional groups during the study period. Especially for FFD, the deviations between the above two periods ranged from −20.68 to −2.79 days; biotic pollination species showed a significantly greater advance than abiotic pollination species. These results were conducive to the understanding of possible changes in both the structure of plant communities and interspecific relationships in the context of climate change.

Keywords

Phenology Climate change First leaf date Leaf coloring date First flowering date Growing season length 

References

  1. Abu-Asab MS, Peterson PM, Shetler SG et al (2001) Earlier plant flowering in spring as a response to global warming in the Washington, DC, area. Biodivers Conserv 10:597–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Badeck FW, Bondeau A, Böttcher K et al (2004) Responses of spring phenology to climate change. New Phytol 162:295–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bai J, Dai JH, Ge QS et al (2010) Relationship between woody plants phenology and climate factors in Xi’an, China (In Chinese). Chin J Plant Ecol 34:1274–1282.Google Scholar
  4. Cayan DR, Kammerdiener SA, Dettinger MD et al (2001) Changes in the onset of spring in the western United States. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 82:399–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen X, Xu L (2012) Phenological responses of Ulmus pumila (Siberian Elm) to climate change in the temperate zone of China. Int J Biometeorol 56:695–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chuine I (2010) Why does phenology drive species distribution? Philos Trans R Soc B 365:3149–3160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chuine I, Beaubien EG (2001) Phenology is a major determinant of tree species range. Ecol Lett 4:500–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cleland EE, Chiariello NR, Loarie SR et al (2006) Diverse responses of phenology to global changes in a grassland ecosystem. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:13740–13744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cleland EE, Chuine I, Menzel A et al (2007) Shifting plant phenology in response to global change. Trends Ecol Evol 22:357–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Devaux C, Lande R (2010) Selection on variance in flowering time within and among individuals. Evolution 64:1311–1320Google Scholar
  11. Du J, Yan P, Dong Y (2010) Phenological response of Nitraria tangutorum to climate change in Minqin County, Gansu Province, northwest China. Int J Biometeorol 54:583–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Emberlin J, Detandt M, Gehrig R et al (2002) Responses in the start of Betula (birch) pollen seasons to recent changes in spring temperatures across Europe. Int J Biometeorol 46:159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fitter AH, Fitter R (2002) Rapid changes in flowering time in British plants. Science 296:1689–1691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ge Q, Dai J, Zheng J et al (2011) Advances in first bloom dates and increased occurrences of yearly second blooms in eastern China since the 1960s: further phenological evidence of climate warming. Ecol Res 26:713–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gordo O, Sanz JJ (2010) Impact of climate change on plant phenology in Mediterranean ecosystems. Global Change Biol 16:1082–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haggerty BP, Galloway LF (2011) Response of individual components of reproductive phenology to growing season length in a monocarpic herb. J Ecol 99:242–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hänninen H (1991) Does climatic warming increase the risk of frost damage in northern trees? Plant Cell Environ 14:449–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huxley A, Griffiths M (1999) The new RHS dictionary of gardening. Grove’s Dictionaries, MünsterGoogle Scholar
  19. IPCC (2001) Contribution of working group II to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Mccarthy J, Canziani O, Leary N et al (eds) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptations, and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, New York, p 1032Google Scholar
  20. Jeong S, Clark SE (2005) Photoperiod regulates flower meristem development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 169:907–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Körner C, Basler D (2010) Phenology under global warming. Science 327:1461–1462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lei MD (1999) Vegetation in Shaanxi, China (In Chinese). Science, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu ZN, Yin XJ (2008) Urban heat island effect and meteorologic factors in Xi’an in Chinese(In Chinese). J Arid Land Resour Environ 22:87–90Google Scholar
  24. Loustau D, Bosc A, Colin A et al (2005) Modeling climate change effects on the potential production of French plains forests at the sub-regional level. Tree Physiol 25:813–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Matsumoto K, Ohta T, Irasawa M et al (2003) Climate change and extension of the Ginkgo biloba L. growing season in Japan. Global Change Biol 9:1634–1642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mckane RB, Grigal DF, Russelle MP (1990) Spatiotemporal differences in 15N uptake and the organization of an old-field plant community. Ecology 71:1126–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Menzel A (2000) Trends in phenological phases in Europe between 1951 and 1996. Int J Biometeorol 44:76–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Menzel A (2003) Plant phenological anomalies in Germany and their relation to air temperature and NAO. Clim Chang 57:243–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Menzel A, Sparks TH, Estrella N et al (2006) European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Global Change Biol 12:1969–1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mitchell AF (1974) A field guide to the trees of Britain and northern Europe. Harper Collins, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  31. Mori S, Hogan CM, Cleveland CJ (2009) Pollination. In: Cleveland CJ (ed) Encyclopedia of Earth, environmental information coalition. National Council for Science and the Environment. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  32. Parmesan C (2007) Influences of species, latitudes and methodologies on estimates of phenological response to global warming. Global Change Biol 13:1860–1872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Parra-Tabla V, Vargas CF(2007) Flowering synchrony and floral display size affect pollination success in a deceit-pollinated tropical orchid. Acta Oecol 32:26–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peñuelas J, Filella I (2001) Responses to a warming world. Science 294:793–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Root TL, Price JT, Hall KR et al (2003) Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 421:57–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schwartz MD, Reiter BE (2000) Changes in north American spring. Int J Climatol 20:929–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sparks TH, Menzel A (2002) Observed changes in seasons: an overview. Int J Climatol 22:1715–1725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wan MW, Liu XZ (1979) China’s national phenological observational criterion (In Chinese). Science, Beijing.Google Scholar
  40. Wang F, Ge QS (2012) Estimation of urbanization bias in observed surface temperature change in China from 1980 to 2009 using satellite land-use data. Chinese Sci Bull 57:1708–1715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wolkovich EM, Cook BI, Allen JM et al (2012) Warming experiments underpredict plant phenological responses to climate change. Nature 485:494–497Google Scholar
  42. Zhang X, Friedl MA, Schaaf CB et al (2004) The footprint of urban climates on vegetation phenology. Geophys Res Lett 31:L12209CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISB 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources ResearchChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations