International Journal of Biometeorology

, Volume 57, Issue 5, pp 715–720 | Cite as

Weekend bias in Citizen Science data reporting: implications for phenology studies

  • Jason R. Courter
  • Ron J. Johnson
  • Claire M. Stuyck
  • Brian A. Lang
  • Evan W. Kaiser
Original Paper


Studies of bird phenology can help elucidate the effects of climate change on wildlife species but observations over broad spatial scales are difficult without a network of observers. Recently, networks of citizen volunteers have begun to report first arrival dates for many migratory species. Potential benefits are substantial (e.g., understanding ecological processes at broad spatial and temporal scales) if known biases of citizen data reporting are identified and addressed. One potential source of bias in bird phenology studies is the tendency for more “first” migratory arrivals to be reported on weekends than on weekdays. We investigated weekend bias in data reporting for five common bird species in North America (Baltimore Oriole, Icterus galbula; Barn Swallow, Hirundo rustica; Chimney Swift, Chaetura pelagica; Purple Martin, Progne subis; and Ruby-throated Hummingbird, Archilochus colubris), and assessed whether this bias affected mean arrival dates reported using data from historical (1880–1969; N = 25,555) and recent (1997–2010; N = 63,149) Citizen Science databases. We found a greater percentage of first arrivals reported on weekends and small but significant differences in mean arrival dates (approximately 0.5 days) for four of five species. Comparing time periods, this weekend bias decreased from 33.7 % and five species in the historical time period to 32 % and three species in the recent, perhaps related to changes in human activity patterns. Our results indicate that weekend bias in citizen data reporting is decreasing over time in North America and including a ‘day of week’ term in models examining changes in phenology could help make conclusions more robust.


Bird phenology Climate change Detectability First arrival dates Spring migration Volunteers 


  1. Beaubien E, Hamann A (2011) Plant phenology networks of citizen scientists: recommendations from two decades of experience in Canada. Int J Biometerol 55:833–841. doi:10.1007/s00484-011-0457-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bombaugh R (2000) From citizen scientists to engineers. J Prof Iss Eng Ed Pr 126:64–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonney R, Cooper CB, Dickinson J, Kelling S, Phillips T, Rosenberg KV, Shirk J (2009) Citizen Science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. Bioscience 59:977–984. doi:10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cink CL, Collins CT (2002) Chimney Swift (Chaetura pelagica). In: Poole A (ed) The birds of North America online. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, Accessed 11 October 2012. doi:10.2173/bna.646 Google Scholar
  5. Cooper CB, Smith JA (2010) Gender patterns in bird-related recreation in the USA and UK. Ecol Soc 15:4Google Scholar
  6. Delaney D, Sperling C, Adams C, Leung B (2008) Marine invasive species: validation of Citizen Science and implications for national monitoring networks. Biol Invasions 10:117–128. doi:10.1007/s10530-007-9114-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DeLeon RL, DeLeon EE, Rising GR (2011) Influence of climate change on avian migrants’ first arrival dates. Condor 113:915–923. doi:10.1525/cond.2011.100223 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dickinson JL, Zuckerberg B, Bonter DN (2010) Citizen Science as an ecological research tool: challenges and benefits. Ann Rev Ecol Evol S 41:149–172. doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144636 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fraser P (1997) How many rarities are we missing?: weekend bias and length of stay revisited. Brit Birds 90:94–101Google Scholar
  10. Lehikoinen ESA, Sparks TH, Zalakevicius M (2004) Arrival and departure dates. Adv Ecol Res 35:1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Marani M (2010) The detection of weekly preferential occurrences with an application to rainfall. J Climate 23:2379–2387. doi:10.1175/2009jcli3313.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Merriam CH (1885) Committee on the migration and geographical distribution of North American birds. Auk 2:117–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Miller-Rushing AJ (2010) Wildlife watchers aid climate research: a new effort to monitor changes in wildlife phenology. Wildlife Prof 3:58–61Google Scholar
  14. Miller-Rushing AJ, Primack RB, Stymeist R (2008) Interpreting variation in bird migration times as observed by volunteers. Auk 125:565–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Presser HB (1999) Toward a 24-hour economy. Science 284:1778–1779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Qin Y, Tonnesen G, Wang Z (2004) Weekend/weekday differences of ozone, NOx, CO, VOCs, PM10 and the light scatter during ozone season in southern California. Atmos Environ 38:3069–3087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rising J, Flood N (1998) Baltimore Oriole (Icterus galbula). In: Poole A (ed) The birds of North America online. Cornell Lab of Ornithol, Ithaca, Accessed 11 October 2012. doi:10.2173/bna.384 Google Scholar
  18. Robb GN, McDonald RA, Chamberlain DE, Bearhop S (2008) Food for thought: supplementary feeding as a driver of ecological change in avian populations. Front Ecol Environ 6:476–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schaffner S (2009) Environmental sporting. J Sport Soc Issues 33:206–229. doi:10.1177/0193723509338862 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Silvertown J (2009) A new dawn for Citizen Science. Trends Ecol Evol 24:467–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sparks T, Huber K, Tryjanowski P (2008) Something for the weekend? Examining the bias in avian phenological recording. Int J Biometerol 52:505–510. doi:10.1007/s00484-008-0146-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Swanson DL, Palmer JS (2009) Spring migration phenology of birds in the Northern Prairie region is correlated with local climate change. J Field Ornithol 80:351–363. doi:10.1111/j.1557-9263.2009.00241.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tryjanowski P, Kuzniak S, Sparks TH (2005) What affects the magnitude of change in first arrival dates of migrant birds? J Ornithol 146:200–205. doi:10.1007/s10336-005-0079-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Visser ME, Both C (2005) Shifts in phenology due to global climate change: the need for a yardstick. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 272:2561–2569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wilson WH (2007) Spring arrival dates of migratory breeding birds in Maine: sensitivity to climate change. Wilson J Ornithol 119:665–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISB 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason R. Courter
    • 2
  • Ron J. Johnson
    • 1
  • Claire M. Stuyck
    • 1
  • Brian A. Lang
    • 1
  • Evan W. Kaiser
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Agricultural, Forest, and Environmental SciencesClemson UniversityClemsonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Earth and Environmental ScienceTaylor UniversityUplandUSA

Personalised recommendations