International Journal of Biometeorology

, Volume 57, Issue 2, pp 287–297 | Cite as

A model approach to project the start of egg laying of Great Tit (Parus major L.) in response to climate change

  • Frank-M. Chmielewski
  • Klaus Blümel
  • Carina Scherbaum-Heberer
  • Bettina Koppmann-Rumpf
  • Karl-Heinz Schmidt
Original Paper

Abstract

The aim of this study was to select a phenological model that is able to calculate the beginning of egg laying of Great Tit (Parus major) for both current and future climate conditions. Four models (M1–M4) were optimised on long-term phenological observations from the Ecological Research Centre Schlüchtern (Hessen/Germany). Model M1 was a common thermal time model that accumulates growing degree days (GDD) on an optimised starting date t1. Since egg laying of Great Tit is influenced not only by air temperature but also by photoperiod, model M1 was extended by a daylength term to give M2. The other two models, M3 and M4, correspond to M1 and M2, but t1 was intentionally set to 1 January, in order to consider already rising temperatures at the beginning of the year. A comparison of the four models led to following results: model M1 had a relatively high root mean square error at verification (RMSEver) of more than 4 days and can be used only to calculate the start of egg laying for current climate conditions because of the relatively late starting date for GDD calculation. The model failed completely if the starting date was set to 1 January (M3). Consideration of a daylength term in models M2 and M4 improved the performance of both models strongly (RMSEver of only 3 days or less), increased the credibility of parameter estimation, and was a precondition to calculate reliable projections in the timing of egg laying in birds for the future. These results confirm that the start of egg laying of Great Tit is influenced not only by air temperature, but also by photoperiod. Although models M2 and M4 both provide comparably good results for current climate conditions, we recommend model M4–with a starting date of temperature accumulation on 1 January–for calculating possible future shifts in the commencement of egg laying. Our regional projections in the start of egg laying, based on five regional climate models (RCMs: REMO-UBA, ECHAM5-CLM, HadCM3-CLM, WETTREG-0, WETTREG-1, GHG emission scenario A1B), indicate that in the near future (2011–2040) no significant change will take place. However, in the mid- (2041–2070) and long-term (2071–2100) range the beginning of egg laying could be advanced significantly by up to 11 days on average of all five RCMs. This result corresponds to the already observed shift in the timing of egg laying by about 1 week, due mainly to an abrupt increase in air temperature at the end of the 1980s by 1.2 K between April and May. The use of five regional climate scenarios additionally allowed to estimate uncertainties among the RCMs.

Keywords

Phenological modelling Photoperiod Model comparison Egg laying of Great Tit Climate change Projections of egg laying 

References

  1. Askeyev OV, Sparks TH, Askeyev IV, Tishin DV, Tryjanowski P (2010) East versus West: contrasts in phenological patterns? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:783–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blümel K, Chmielewski F-M (2011) Climate change in Hessen—chances, risks, and costs for fruit growing and viniculture (in German). Annual Report, Faculty of Agriculture and Horticulture, Humboldt University of BerlinGoogle Scholar
  3. Blümel K, Chmielewski F-M (2012) Shortcomings of classical phenological forcing models and a way to overcome them. Agric For Meteorol (in press)Google Scholar
  4. Both C, Visser ME (2005) The effect of climate change on the correlation between avian life-history traits. Glob Chang Biol 11:1606–1613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown JL, Li S-H, Bhagabati N (1999) Long-term trend toward earlier breeding in an American bird: a resonse to global warming. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:5565–5569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cannell MGR, Smith RI (1983) Thermal time, chill days and prediction of budburst in Picea sitchensis. J Appl Ecol 20:951–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chambers LE, Keatley MR (2010) Australian bird phenology: a search for climate signals. Aust Ecol 35:969–979. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2010.02108.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chmielewski F-M, Blümel K, Henniges Y, Blanke M, Weber RWS, Zoth M (2011) Phenological models for the beginning of apple blossom in Germany. Meteorol Z 20(5):487–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chuine (2003) Plant development models. In: Schwartz MD (ed) Phenology: An integrative environmental science. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 217–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coppack T, Pulido, F (2004) Photoperiodic response and the adaptability of avian life cycles to environmental change. Adv Ecol Res 35:131–150. doi:10.1016/S0065-2504(04)35007-5
  11. Creswell W, McCleery R (2003) How great tits maintain synchronization of their hatch date with food supply in response to long term variability in temperature. J Anim Ecol 72:356–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crick HQP, Dudley C, Glue DE, Thomson DL (1997) UK birds are laying eggs earlier. Nature 338:526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crick HQP, Sparks TH (1999) Climate change related to egg-laying trends. Nature 399:423–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunn PO, Winkler DW (1999) Climate change has affected the breeding date of tree swallows throughout North America. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:2487–2490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gordo O (2007) Why are bird migration dates shifting? A review of weather and climate effects on avian migratory phenology. Clim Res 35:37–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gosler A, Clement P (2007) Family Paridae (Tits and Chickadees). In: Del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Christie D (eds) Handbook of the birds of the World. vol 12: Picathartes to Tits and Chickadees. Lynx, Barcelona, pp 662–709Google Scholar
  17. Grabherr G, Gottfried M, Pauli H (2002) Ökologische Effekte an den Grenzen des Lebens. Spektrum der Wissenschaft, Dossier Klima, pp 84–89Google Scholar
  18. Inouye DW, Barr B, Armitag KB, Inouye BD (2000) Climate change is affecting altitudinal migrants and hibernating species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:1630–1633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jonzén N, Lindén A, Ergon T, Knudsen E, Vik JO, Rubolini D, Piacentini D, Brinch C, Spina F, Karlsson L, Stervander M, Andersson A, Waldenström J, Lehikoinen A, Edvardsen E, Solvang R, Stenseth NC (2006) Rapid Advance of Spring Arrival Dates in Long-Distance Migratory Birds. Science 312(5782):1959–1961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kluijver HN (1951) The population ecology of the Great Tit Parus major L. Ardea 39:1–135Google Scholar
  21. Körner Ch, Basler D (2010) Phenology under global warming. Science 327:1461–1462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Koppmann-Rumpf B, Heberer C, Schmidt K-H (2003) Long term study of the reaction of the Edible Dormouse Glis glis (Rodentia: Gliridae) to climatic changes and its interactions with hole-breeding passerines. Acta Zool Hung 49(suppl 1):69–76Google Scholar
  23. Kreienkamp F, Spekat A, Enke W (2010) Ergebnisse eines regionalen Szenarienlaufs für Deutschland mit dem statistischen Modell WETTREG2010. Bericht, Climate & Environment Consulting, Potsdam, 48SGoogle Scholar
  24. Matzneller P, Blümel K, Chmielewski F-M (2012) Chilling and forcing models improved by a daylength-term to predict the beginning of sour cherry blossom. Agric For Meteorol (in press)Google Scholar
  25. McCleery RH, Perrins CM (1998) Temperature and egg-laying trends. Nature 391:30–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meijer T, Nienaber U, Langer U, Trillmich F (1999) Temperature and timing of egg laying of European starlings. Condor 101:124–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, Teller AH, Teller E (1953) Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys 21(6):1087–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Perrins CM (2004) Die Kohlmeise. In: Perrins, CM (Ed.): Die BLV Enzyklopädie Vögel der Welt. BLV, Munich, pp 554–555Google Scholar
  29. Robertson GW (1968) A biometeorological time scale for a cereal crop involving day and night temperatures and photoperiod. Int J Biometeorol 12:191–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rowan W (1926) On photoperiodism, reproductive periodicity, and the annual migrations of certain birds and fishes. Proc Boston Soc Nat Hist 38:147–189Google Scholar
  31. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (1997) Numerical recipes in Fortran 77. The art of scientific computing, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  32. Sanz JJ (2002) Climate change and breeding parameters of great and blue tits throughout the western Palaeararctic. Glob Chang Biol 8:409–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sanz JJ (2003) Large-scale effect of climate change on breeding parameters of pied flycatchers in Western Europe. Ecography 26:45–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schaper SV, Rueda C, Sharp PJ, Dawson AS, Visser ME (2011) Spring phenology does not affect timing of reproduction in the great tit (Parus major). J Exp Biol 214:3664–3671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Scheifinger H, Koch E, Winkler H (2007) Erste Ergebnisse einer Analyse vogelphänologischer Beobachtungen der Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik 1951–1999 in Österreich. Promet 33:52–55Google Scholar
  36. Schmidt K-H (1984) Frühjahrstemperaturen und Legebeginn bei Meisen (Parus). J Ornithol 125:321–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schmidt K-H, Zub P (1993) Parus major Linnaeus 1758—Kohlmeise. In: GlutzvonBlotzheim UN, Bauer KM (eds) Mitteleuropas. Band 13 (4): Passeriformes. Aula, Wiesbaden, pp 678–808Google Scholar
  38. Sparks TH, Crick HQP, Dunn, PO, Sokolov LV (2003) Birds. In: Schwartz M (ed) Phenology: an integrative environmental science. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 421–436Google Scholar
  39. Visser ME, Van Noordwijk AJ, Tinbergen JM, Lessells CM (1998) Warmer springs lead to mistimed reproduction in great tits (Parus major). Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 265:1867–1870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Visser ME, Hollemann LJM (2001) Warmer springs disrupt the synchrony of oak and winter moth phenology. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 268:289–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wackernagel H (1998) Multivariate geostatistics. An introduction with applications. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  42. Winkel W, Hudde H (1997) Long-term trends in reproductive traits of tits (Parus major, P. caeruleus) and Pied Flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca). J Avian Biol 28:187–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISB 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank-M. Chmielewski
    • 1
  • Klaus Blümel
    • 1
  • Carina Scherbaum-Heberer
    • 2
  • Bettina Koppmann-Rumpf
    • 2
  • Karl-Heinz Schmidt
    • 2
  1. 1.Agricultural Climatology, Faculty of Agriculture and HorticultureHumboldt-University of BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Ecological Research Centre SchlüchternSchlüchternGermany

Personalised recommendations