Abstract
While thermal comfort in mass transportation vehicles is relevant to service quality and energy consumption, benchmarks for such comfort that reflect the thermal adaptations of passengers are currently lacking. This study reports a field experiment involving simultaneous physical measurements and a questionnaire survey, collecting data from 2,129 respondents, that evaluated thermal comfort in short- and long-haul buses and trains. Experimental results indicate that high air temperature, strong solar radiation, and low air movement explain why passengers feel thermally uncomfortable. The overall insulation of clothing worn by passengers and thermal adaptive behaviour in vehicles differ from those in their living and working spaces. Passengers in short-haul vehicles habitually adjust the air outlets to increase thermal comfort, while passengers in long-haul vehicles prefer to draw the drapes to reduce discomfort from extended exposure to solar radiation. The neutral temperatures for short- and long-haul vehicles are 26.2°C and 27.4°C, while the comfort zones are 22.4–28.9°C and 22.4–30.1°C, respectively. The results of this study provide a valuable reference for practitioners involved in determining the adequate control and management of in-vehicle thermal environments, as well as facilitating design of buses and trains, ultimately contributing to efforts to achieve a balance between the thermal comfort satisfaction of passengers and energy conserving measures for air-conditioning in mass transportation vehicles.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ASHRAE (2004) ASHRAE Standard 55-2004, Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-conditioning Engineers, Atlanta, GA
Ballantyne ER, Hill RK, Spencer JW (1977) Probit analysis of thermal sensation assessments. Int J Biometeorol 21(1):29–43
Bhatti MS (1999a) Evolution of automotive air conditioning—riding in comfort: part II. ASHRAE J 41(9):44–52
Bhatti MS (1999b) Evolution of automotive heating—riding in comfort: part I. ASHRAE J 41(8):51–57
Brager GS, de Dear RJ (1998) Thermal adaptation in the built environment: a literature review. Energ Build 27(1):83–96
Brager GS, Paliaga G, De Dear R, Olesen B, Wen J, Nicol F, Humphreys M (2004) Operable windows, personal control, and occupant comfort. ASHRAE Trans 110(2):17–35
Cheng MJ, Hwang RL, Lin TP (2008) Field experiments on thermal comfort requirements for campus dormitories in Taiwan. Indoor Built Environ 17(3):191–202
da Silva MC, Alcobia C, Martinho NAG, Ramos JME (2006) Indoor environment in vehicles. Int J Veh Des 42(1–2):35–48
de Dear RJ (1998) A global database of thermal comfort field experiments. ASHRAE Trans 104(1B):1141–1152
de Dear RJ, Brager GS (1998) Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference. ASHRAE Trans 104(1A):145–167
de Dear RJ, Brager GS (2002) Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated buildings: revisions to ASHRAE Standard 55. Energ Build 34(6):549–561
de Dear RJ, Fountain ME (1994) Field experiments on occupant comfort and office thermal environments in a hot-humid climate. ASHRAE Trans 100(2):457–474
Fanger PO (1972) Thermal comfort. McGraw Hill, New York
Farrington B, Brodt DL, Burch SD, Keyser MA (1997) Opportunities to reduce vehicle climate control loads. In: Proceedings of the the 15th Electric Vehicle Symposium, Brussels, Belgium, 1997 European Electric Road Vehicle Association
Hodder SG, Parsons K (2007) The effects of solar radiation on thermal comfort. Int J Biometeorol 51(3):233–250
Hwang RL, Lin TP (2007) Thermal comfort requirements for occupants of semi-outdoor and outdoor environments in hot-humid regions. Archit Sci Rev 50(4):60–67
Hwang RL, Lin TP, Kuo NJ (2006) Field experiments on thermal comfort in campus classrooms in Taiwan. Energ Build 38(1):53–62
Hwang RL, Yang KH, Chen CP, Wang ST (2008) Subjective responses and comfort reception in transitional spaces for guests versus staff. Build Environ 43(12):2013–2021
Hwang RL, Cheng MJ, Lin TP, Ho MC (2009a) Thermal perceptions, general adaptation methods and occupant’s idea about the trade-off between thermal comfort and energy saving in hot-humid regions. Build Environ 44(6):1128–1134
Hwang RL, Lin TP, Chen CP, Kuo NJ (2009b) Investigating the adaptive model of thermal comfort for naturally ventilated school buildings in Taiwan. Int J Biometeorol 53(2):189–200
ISO (1995) International Standard 10551, Ergonomics of the thermal environment - Assessment of the influence of the thermal environment using subjective judgement scales. International Standard Organization, Geneva
ISO (1998) International Standard 7726, Thermal environment-instruments and method for measuring physical quantities. International Standard Organization, Geneva
ISO (2005) International Standard 7730, Ergonomics of the thermal environment—analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria. International Standard Organization, Geneva
ISO (2006a) International Standard 14505–2, Ergonomics of the thermal environment—evaluation of thermal environments in vehicles. Part 2: determination of equivalent temperature. International Standard Organization, Geneva
ISO (2006b) International Standard 14505–3, Ergonomics of the thermal environment—evaluation of thermal environments in vehicles. Part 3: evaluation of thermal comfort using human subjects. International Standard Organization, Geneva
Lin TP (2009) Thermal perception, adaptation and attendance in a public square in hot and humid regions. Build Environ 44(10):2017–2026
Martinho NAG, Silva MCG, Ramos JAE (2004) Evaluation of thermal comfort in a vehicle cabin. Proc Inst Mech Eng D J Automobile Eng 218(D2):159–166
McIntyre DA (1980) Indoor climate. Applied Science, London
Mezrhab A, Bouzidi M (2006) Computation of thermal comfort inside a passenger car compartment. Appl Therm Eng 26(14–15):1697–1704
Nilsson H, Holmér I (2003) Comfort climate evaluation with thermal manikin methods and computer simulation models. Indoor Air 13(1):28–37
Paciuk M (1990) The role of personal control of the environment in thermal comfort and satisfaction at the workplace. In: Selby R, Anthony K, Choi J, Orland B (eds) Coming of age. 21. Environment Design Research Association, Oklahoma, pp303–312
Shek KW, Chan WT (2008) Combined comfort model of thermal comfort and air quality on buses in Hong Kong. Sci Total Environ 389(2–3):277–282
Taniguchi Y (2001) Simulation models for predicting car occupants’ thermal comfort. R&D Review of Toyota CRDL 36(2):1–2
Walgama C, Fackrell S, Karimi M, Fartaj A, Rankin GW (2006) Passenger thermal comfort in vehicles—a review. Proc Inst Mech Eng D J Automobile Eng 220(D5):543–562
Wohlwill JF (1974) Human adaptation to levels of environmental stimulation. Hum Ecol 2(2):127–147
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank the National Science Council of Taiwan, for financially supporting this research under Contract No. NSC 96-2629-E-150-001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, TP., Hwang, RL., Huang, KT. et al. Passenger thermal perceptions, thermal comfort requirements, and adaptations in short- and long-haul vehicles. Int J Biometeorol 54, 221–230 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-009-0273-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-009-0273-9