International Journal of Biometeorology

, Volume 51, Issue 4, pp 275–286 | Cite as

Examining Ambrosia pollen episodes at Poznań (Poland) using back-trajectory analysis

Original Article

Abstract

The pollen grains of Ambrosia spp. are considered to be important aeroallergens in parts of southern and central Europe. Back-trajectories have been analysed with the aim of finding the likely sources of Ambrosia pollen grains that arrived at Poznań (Poland). Temporal variations in Ambrosia pollen at Poznań from 1995–2005 were examined in order to identify Ambrosia pollen episodes suitable for further investigation using back-trajectory analysis. The trajectories were calculated using the transport model within the Lagrangian air pollution model, ACDEP (Atmospheric Chemistry and Deposition). Analysis identified two separate populations in Ambrosia pollen episodes, those that peaked in the early morning between 4 a.m. and 8 a.m., and those that peaked in the afternoon between 2 p.m. and 6 p.m.. Six Ambrosia pollen episodes between 2001 and 2005 were examined using back-trajectory analysis. The results showed that Ambrosia pollen episodes that peaked in the early morning usually arrived at Poznań from a southerly direction after passing over southern Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary, whereas air masses that brought Ambrosia pollen to Poznań during the afternoon arrived from a more easterly direction and predominantly stayed within the borders of Poland. Back-trajectory analysis has shown that there is a possibility that long-range transport brings Ambrosia pollen to Poznań from southern Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary. There is also a likelihood that Ambrosia is present in Poland, as shown by the arrival of pollen during the afternoon that originated primarily from within the country.

Keywords

Aerobiology Ragweed Ambrosia Poznań Back-trajectory analysis 

References

  1. Belmonte J, Vendrell M, Roure JM, Vidal J, Botey J, Cadahía A (2000) Levels of Ambrosia pollen in the atmospheric spectra of Catalan aerobiological stations. Aerobiologia 16(1):93–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brandt J, Christensen JH, Frohn LM, Berkowicz R, Palmgren F (2000) The DMU-ATMI THOR air pollution forecast system - system description, NERI Technical Report No. 321, National Environmental Research Institute, P.O. Box 358, Frederiksborgvej 399, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark: p 60Google Scholar
  3. Brandt J, Christensen JH, Frohn LM, Berkowicz R (2001a) Operational air pollution forecasts from regional scale to urban street scale. Part 1: system description. Phys Chem Earth Pt B 26(10):781–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brandt J, Christensen JH, Frohn LM, Berkowicz R (2001b) Operational air pollution forecasts from regional scale to urban street scale. Part 2: performance evaluation. Phys Chem Earth Pt B 26(10):825–830Google Scholar
  5. Brandt J, Christensen JH, Frohn LM, Palmgren F, Berkowicz R, Zlatev Z (2001c) Operational air pollution forecasts from european to local scale. Atmospheric Environment 35(Suppl 1):S91–S98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cecchi L, Morabito M, Domeneghetti MP, Crisci A, Onorari M, Orlandini S (2006) Long distance transport of ragweed pollen as a potential cause of allergy in central Italy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 96(1):86–91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Comtois P (1998) Ragweed (Ambrosia sp.): the Phoenix of allergophytes. 6th International Congress on Aerobiology. Satellite Symposium Proceedings: Ragweed in Europe, Perugia, Italy, ALK AbellóGoogle Scholar
  8. Corden J, Stach A, Millington W (2002) A comparison of Betula pollen seasons at two European sites; Derby, United Kingdom and Poznan, Poland (1995–1999). Aerobiologia 18:45–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dahl A, Strandhede S-O, Wihl J-A (1999) Ragweed-An allergy risk in Sweden? Aerobiologia 15(4):293–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellermann T, Hertel O, Munies C, Kemp K (2002) Atmospheric Deposition 2001, NOVA 2003 (In Danish: Atmosfærisk deposition. NOVA 2003), NERI Technical Report, no. 418, National Environmental Research Institute, P.O. Box 358, Frederiksborgvej 399, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark, p 82Google Scholar
  11. Faegri K, Iversen J (1992) Textbook of Pollen Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  12. GUS Glówny Urzad Statystyczny (2001) Rocznik Statystyczny Poznania. http://www.stat.gov.pl/urzedy/poznan/publikacje/rocznik_stolicy_woj/ludnosc/03m05_01.pdf
  13. Hart ML, Wentworth JE, Bailey JP (1994) The effects of trap height and weather variables on recorded pollen concentration at Leicester. Grana 33:100–103Google Scholar
  14. Hertel O, Christensen J, Runge EH, Asman WAH, Berkowicz R, Hovmand MF, Hov Ø (1995) Development and testing of a new variable scale air pollution model-ACDEP. Atmospheric Environment 29(11):1267–1290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hirst JM (1952) An automatic volumetric spore trap. Ann Appl Biol 39(2):257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hjelmroos M (1991) Evidence of long distance transport of Betula pollen. Grana 30:215–228Google Scholar
  17. Hjelmroos M (1992) Long-distance transport of Betula pollen grains and allergic symptoms. Aerobiologia 8:231–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jackowiak B (1993) Atlas of distribution of vascular plants in Poznan. Publications of the Department of Plant Taxonomy of Adam Mickiewicz University, No 2, PoznanGoogle Scholar
  19. Jäger S (1998) Global aspects of ragweed in Europe. 6th International Congress on Aerobiology. Satellite Symposium Proceedings: Ragweed in Europe, Perugia, Italy, ALK AbellóGoogle Scholar
  20. Jäger S (2000) Ragweed (Ambrosia) sensitisation rates correlate with the amount of inhaled airborne pollen. A 14-year study in Vienna, Austria. Aerobiologia 16(1):149–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Járai-Komlódi M (2000) Some details about ragweed airborne pollen in Hungary. Aerobiologia 16(2):291–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones B, Barnes C, Portnoy JM, Hu F (2006) Diurnal variation of airborne ragweed pollen in a metropolitan area-an 8 year perspective. J Allergy Clin Immunol 117(2):S29, SuppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laaidi K, Laaidi M (1999) Airborne pollen of Ambrosia in Burgundy (France) 1996–1997. Aerobiologia 15(1):65–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Laaidi M, Thibaudon M, Besancenot J-P (2003) Two statistical approaches to forecasting the start and duration of the pollen season of Ambrosia in the area of Lyon (France). Int J Biometeorol 48(2):65–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Makovcová S, Zlinská J, Mikolás V, Salát D, Krio M (1998) Ragweed in Slovak Republic. 6th International Congress on Aerobiology. Satellite Symposium Proceedings: Ragweed in Europe, Perugia, Italy, ALK AbellóGoogle Scholar
  26. Makra L, Juhász M, Borsos E, Béczi R (2004) Meteorological variables connected with airborne ragweed pollen in Southern Hungary. Int J Biometeorol 29(1):37–47Google Scholar
  27. Mesinger F, Janiæ ZI, Nickoviæ S, Gavrilov D, Deaven DG (1988) The step-mountain coordinate: model description and performance for cases of alpine lee cyclogenesis and for case of an appalachian redevelopment. Mon Weather Rev 116(7):1493–1518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nickovic S, Michailovic D, Rajkovic B, Papdopulus A (1998) The weather forecasting system SKIRON II, description of the model. University of Athens, Athens. ISBN VOL II: 960-8468-16-7 p 228Google Scholar
  29. Peternel R, Culig J, Srnec L, Mitic B, Vukusic I, Hrga I (2005) Variation in ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) pollen concentration in Central Croatia. Ann Agric Environ Med 12(1):11–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Puc M (2004) Ragweed pollen in the air of Szczecin. Ann Agric Environ Med 11(1):53–57PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Rich TCG (1994) Ragweeds (Ambrosia L.) in Britain. Grana 33:38–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rybnícek O, Novotná B, Rybníckova E, Rybnícek K (2000) Ragweed in the Czech Republic. Aerobiologia 16(2):287–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Saar M, Gudžinskas Z, Plompuu T, Linno E, Minkiene Z, Motiekaityte V (2000) Ragweed plants and airborne pollen in the Baltic States. Aerobiologia 16(1):101–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Skjøth AC, Hertel O, Ellermann T (2002) Use of the ACDEP trajectory model in the Danish nation-wide Background Monitoring Programme. Phys Chem Earth Pt B 27(35):1469–1477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith M, Emberlin J, Kress A (2005) Examining high magnitude grass pollen episodes at Worcester, United Kingdom, using back-trajectory analysis. Aerobiologia 21(2):85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stach A (2000) Variation in pollen concentration of the most allergenic taxa in Poznan (Poland), 1995–1996. Aerobiologia 16:63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stach A (2005) Is pollen of ragweed (Ambrosia spp.) a threat to people with allergies in the Wielkopolska region? Biodiversity: Research and Conservation 1(16):Accepted and awaiting publicationGoogle Scholar
  38. Stepalska D, Szczepanek K, Myszkowska D (2002) Variation in Ambrosia pollen concentration in Southern and Central Poland in 1982–1999. Aerobiologia 18(1):13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Taramaracaz P, Lambelet C, Clot B, Keimer C, Hauser C (2005) Ragweed (Ambrosia) progression and its health risks: will Switzerland resist this invasion? Swiss Med Weekly 135:538–548Google Scholar
  40. White JF, Bernstein DI (2003) Key pollen allergens in North America. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 91(5):425–435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wos A (1994) Klimat Niziny Wielkopolskiej. Adam Mickiewicz University, PoznanGoogle Scholar
  42. Zukowski W (1960) Kilka interesujacych gatunków synantropijnych z miasta Poznania. Przyr Polski Zach 4:141–145Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ISB 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Stach
    • 1
  • M. Smith
    • 1
    • 2
  • C. A. Skjøth
    • 3
  • J. Brandt
    • 3
  1. 1.Laboratory of AeropalynologyAdam Mickiewicz UniversityPoznańPoland
  2. 2.National Pollen and Aerobiology Research UnitUniversity of WorcesterWorcesterUK
  3. 3.Department of Atmospheric EnvironmentNational Environmental Research InstituteRoskildeDenmark

Personalised recommendations