Skip to main content
Log in

Elektrophysiologische Untersuchungen bei Kopfschmerzen: Die “contingent negative variation” (CNV)

Electrophysiological studies on headache: the contingent negative variation

  • Übersichten
  • Published:
Der Schmerz Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Mit der Messung der “contingent negative variation” (CNV), einem langsamen Potential, das auf der Kopfoberfläche abgeleitet werden kann, bietet sich eine Methode an, mit der insbesondere die kortikale Pathophysiologie bei chronischen Kopfschmerzen untersucht werden kann. Dabei zeigt sich bei Patienten mit Migräne ohne Aura im schmerzfreien Intervall eine deutlich negativere CNV-Amplitude im Vergleich zu Gesunden. Dieses langsame Potential hängt eng mit der Aktivität zentraler noradrenerger Strukturen zusammen, weswegen sich diese Meßmethode bei zentral bedingten Erkrankungen anbietet. Neuere Studien, in denen die CNV wiederholt an Kopfschmerzpatienten gemessen wurde, weisen auf eine periodisch sich verändernde Amplitude hin. So kann bei Migränepatienten wenige Tage vor einem Migränean-fall ein Anstieg in der Negativierung der CNV beobachtet werden, der sich mit dem Anfall wieder normalisiert. Trotz zum Teil beein-druckender befunde im Gruppen-vergleich ist die Methode der CNV-Messung im Einzelfall sehr unspezifisch. Deswegen wird sich diese Meßmethode hauptsächlich im Bereich zur wissenschaftlichen Erforschung der Pathophysiologie von chronischen Kopfschmerzen und weniger als Routinediagnostikum etablieren.

Abstract

The contingent negative variation (CNV) is a slow cortical potential recorded from the scalp. This method allows the pathophysiology of chronic headaches to be elucidated. When assessed during the pain-free interval patients suffering from migraine without aura show significantly more negative amplitudes than healthy controls. This negativity reflects the activity of cerebral noradrenergic systems. Some studies using repeated recordings of the CNV show a periodicity in amplitude change. When migraine patients are assessed a few days before a migraine attack occurs, they show pronounced negativity, which normalized during the attack. Despite these interesting findings that are based on group comparisons, evaluating the CNV on an individual basis does not allow specific conclusions. Thus, assessment of the CNV is an important tool to examine pathophysiological aspects of chronic headaches, but is not suitable as a diagnostic procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Amabile G, Fattaposta F, Pozzessere G, Albani G, Sanarelli L, Rizzo PA, Morocutti C (1986) Parkinson Disease: electrophysiological (CNV) analysis related to pharmacological treatment. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 64: 521

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Böcker KBE, Timsit-Berthier M, Schoenen J, Brunia CHM (1990) Contingent negative variation in migraine. Headache 30: 604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Besken E, Pothmann R, Sartory G (1993) Contingent negative variation in childhood migraine. Cephalalgia 13: 42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gerber WD, Kropp P (1993) Migräne als Reizverarbeitungsstörung. Der Schmerz 7: 280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gerber WD, Kropp P (1994) The predictable migraine attack. News Headache 4: 3

    Google Scholar 

  6. Göbel H, Krapat S, Ensink FBM, Soyka D (1993) Comparison of contingent negative variation between migraine interval and migraine attack before and after treatment with sumatriptan. Headache 33: 570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Göbel H, Schmidt G, Dworschak M, Stolze H, Heuss D (1994) Essential plant oils and headache mechanisms. Cephalalgia 14: 228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kropp P, Gerber WD (1993) Is increased amplitude of contingent negative variation in migraine due to cortical hyperactivity or to reduced habituation? Cephalalgia 13: 37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kropp P, Gerber WD (1995) Contingent negative variation during migraine attack and interval: evidence for normalization of slow cortical potentials during the attack. Cephalalgia 15: 123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Maertens de Noordhout A, Timsit-Berthier M, Schoenen J (1987) Effects of beta-blockade on contingent negative variation in migraine. Ann Neurol 21: 111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Marczynski TJ (1978) A parsimonious model of mammalian brain and event-related slow potentials. In: Otto D (ed) Multidisciplinary perspectives in event-related brain potential research. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington DC, p 428

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nagel-Leiby S, Welch KMA, D'Andrea G, Grunfeld S, Brown E (1990) Event-related slow potentials and associated catecholamine function in migraine. Cephalalgia 10: 317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rizzo PA, Amabile G, Caporali M, Spadaro M, Zanasi M, Morocutti C (1978) A CNV study in a group of patients with traumatic head injuries. Electroencephalography Clin Neurophysiol 45: 281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rockstroh B, Elbert T, Canavan A, Lutzenberger W, Birbaumer N (1989) Slow potentials and behavior. Urban & Schwarzenberg, München

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rockstroh B (1993) Regulation of cortical excitability in patients with epilepsy and its measurement by means of slow cortical potentials. In: McCallum WC, Curry SH (eds) Slow potential changes in the human brain. Plenum, New York, p 209

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Schoenen J, Maertens de Noordhout A, Timsit-Berthier M, Timsit M (1986) Contingent negative variation and efficacy of beta-blocking agents in migraine. Cephalalgia 6: 229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schoenen J (1987) Sympathetic hyperarousal in migraine? Evaluation by contingent negative variation and psychomotor testing. Effects of betablockers. In: Clifford Rose F (ed) Current problems in neurology vol 4. Advances in headache research. Libbey, London, p 155

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schoenen J, Maertens A, Timsit-Berthier M, Timsit M (1985) Contingent negative variation (CNV) as a diagnostic and physiopathologic tool in headache patients. In: Clifford Rose F (ed) Migraine. Karger, Basel, p 17

    Google Scholar 

  19. Timsit-Berthier M (1993) Contingent negative variation and its relationships to arousal and stress in psychopathology. In: McCallum WC, Curry SH (eds) Slow potential changes in the human brain. Plenum Press, New York, p 219

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Timsit-Berthier M, Mantanus H, Poncelet M, Marissiaux P, Legros J (1986) Contingent negative variation as a new method to assess the catecholaminergic systems. In: Gallai V (ed) Maturation of the CNS and evoked potentials. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam New York Oxford, p 260

    Google Scholar 

  21. Timsit M, Timsit-Berthier M, Schoenen J, Meartens de Noordhout A (1987) Contingent negative variation and EEG power spectrum in headache. In: Barber C, Blum T (eds) Evoked potentials III. Butterworths, Stoneham, p 370

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wallasch TM, Kropp P, Weinschütz T, König B (1993) Contingent negative variation in tension-type headache. In Olesen J, Schoenen J (eds) Tension-type headache: Classification, Mechanisms, and Treatment. Raven Press, New York, p 173

    Google Scholar 

  23. Walter WG, Cooper R, Aldridge VJ, McCallum WC, Winter AL (1964) Contingent negative variation: an electric sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy on the human brain. Nature 203: 380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kropp, P., Göbel, H., Dworschak, M. et al. Elektrophysiologische Untersuchungen bei Kopfschmerzen: Die “contingent negative variation” (CNV). Schmerz 10, 130–134 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004820050032

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004820050032

Schlüsselwörter

Key words

Navigation