Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Progressive Muskelrelaxation nach Jacobson bei der Migräneprophylaxe

Klinische Effektivität und Wirkmechanismen

Progressive muscle relaxation according to Jacobson for migraine prophylaxis

Clinical effectiveness and mode of action

Der Schmerz volume 32, pages 250–258 (2018)Cite this article

Zusammenfassung

Seit Anfang der 1970er-Jahre wird die progressive Muskelrelaxation (PMR) nach Jacobson in der Migräneprophylaxe eingesetzt. Hintergrund ist die Annahme, dass Migränepatienten eine erhöhte autonome Aktivierung aufweisen, der man mit systematischer Entspannung entgegensteuern kann. Entspannungsverfahren reduzieren neben dem Aktivierungsniveau auch die zentrale Schmerzverarbeitung, außerdem bewirken entspannende Strategien eine Aktivierung in schmerzhemmenden Strukturen im periaquäduktalen Grau. Metaanalysen zeigen, dass die PMR ebenso wirksam ist wie medikamentöse Verfahren. Ein guter Effekt stellt sich nur dann ein, wenn regelmäßig täglich mindestens 5–25 min geübt wird und ein Transfer der Übungen in den Alltag erfolgt. Diese Übersicht fasst die empirischen Belege für die Wirksamkeit von PMR bei Migräne kritisch zusammen. Es wird ein Mangel insbesondere an aktuellen Studien zur Thematik festgestellt. In einer eigenen Studie mit 50 Migränepatienten und 46 gesunden Kontrollen konnte neben der klinischen Wirksamkeit auch eine Änderung der kortikalen Aufmerksamkeitszuwendung bei der Messung der kontingenten negativen Variation („contingent negative variation“ [CNV]) nachgewiesen werden. Die zuvor erhöhte CNV-Amplitude normalisierte sich bei regelmäßiger Anwendung der PMR bei Migränepatienten. Mit der Übersicht über PMR-Studien zur Migräneprophylaxe und mit der eigenen Studie kann gezeigt werden, dass PMR ein effektives nichtmedikamentöses Verfahren zur Migräneprophylaxe ist und dass neben den klinischen Effekten auch nachweisbare Änderungen der kortikalen Reizverarbeitung im Sinne einer Normalisierung bewirkt werden können.

Abstract

Progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) after Jacobson has been used for migraine prophylaxis since the early 1970s. Migraine patients are assumed to have an enhanced autonomic arousal which can be counterbalanced by systematic relaxation. Relaxation techniques are thought to reduce the activation level, to alter cortical pain processing and to enhance activation in pain-reducing cortical structures in the periaqueductal grey matter. Meta-analyses could show PMR to be just as efficacious as pharmacological treatment options. A beneficial effect can only arise if regular daily exercises of 5–25 min are performed and the exercises are transferred into the daily routine. This review critically summarizes the empirical findings concerning the effects of PMR on migraine. A lack of recent research on this topic was determined. In a study by this group 50 migraine patients and 46 healthy controls were examined. It could be shown that in addition to the clinical efficacy on migraine frequency, changes in cortical information processing, measured by means of the evoked potential contingent negative variation (CNV) could also be determined. The initially increased CNV amplitude became normalized after regular PMR training in migraine patients. With the review of PMR studies on migraine prophylaxis and the results of our own study it could be shown that PMR is an efficacious non-pharmacological treatment option for migraine prophylaxis. In addition to its clinical effects, alterations in cortical stimulation processing in terms of a normalization of the CNV could be documented.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Robbins MS, Lipton RB (2010) The epidemiology of primary headache disorders. Semin Neurol 30:107–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. International Headache Society (2004) The international classification of headache disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia 24(Suppl 1):9–160

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gasparini CF, Sutherland HG, Griffiths LR (2013) Studies on the pathophysiology and genetic basis of migraine. Curr Genomics 14:300–315

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Noseda R, Burstein R (2013) Migraine pathophysiology: anatomy of the trigeminovascular pathway and associated neurological symptoms, cortical spreading depression, sensitization, and modulation of pain. Pain 154(Suppl 1):S44–S53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pietrobon D, Moskowitz MA (2013) Pathophysiology of migraine. Annu Rev Physiol 75:365–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schoenen J, Ambrosini A, Sándor PS, Maertens de Noordhout A (2003) Evoked potentials and transcranial magnetic stimulation in migraine: published data and viewpoint on their pathophysiologic significance. Clin Neurophysiol 114:955–972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brighina F, Palermo A, Fierro B (2009) Cortical inhibition and habituation to evoked potentials: relevance for pathophysiology of migraine. J Headache Pain 10:77–84

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Coppola G, Di Lorenzo C, Schoenen J, Pierelli F (2013) Habituation and sensitization in primary headaches. J Headache Pain 14:65

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Walter WG, Cooper R, Aldridge VJ, McCallum WC, Winter AL (1964) Contingent negative variation: an electric sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature 203:380–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kropp P, Wallasch TM, Müller B, Meyer B, Darabaneanu S, Bosse C, Keller A, Meyer W, Gerber WD (2015) Disease duration of episodic migraine correlates with modified amplitudes and habituation of contingent negative variation. J Neural Transm 122:877–885

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Siniatchkin M, Andrasik F, Kropp P, Niederberger U, Strenge H, Averkina N, Lindner V, Stephani U, Gerber WD (2007) Central mechanisms of controlled-release metoprolol in migraine: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Cephalalgia 27:1024–1032

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. De Tommaso M, Guido M, Sardaro M, Serpino C, Vecchio E, De Stefano G, Di Claudio T, Specchio LM, Livrea P (2008) Effects of topiramate and levetiracetam vs placebo on habituation of contingent negative variation in migraine patients. Neurosci Lett 442:81–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Siniatchkin M, Gerber-von Müller G, Darabaneanu S, Petermann F, Stephani U, Gerber WD (2011) Behavioural treatment programme contributes to normalization of contingent negative variation in children with migraine. Cephalalgia 31:562–572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Overath CH, Darabaneanu S, Evers MC, Gerber WD, Graf M, Keller A, Niederberger U, Schäl H, Siniatchkin M, Weisser B (2014) Does an aerobic endurance programme have an influence on information processing in migraineurs? J Headache Pain 15:11

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Evers S, May A, Fritsche G, Kropp P, Lampl C, Limmroth V, Malzacher V, Sandor P, Straube A, Diener HC (2008) Akuttherapie und Prophylaxe der Migräne. Leitlinie der Deutschen Migräne- und Kopfschmerzgesellschaft und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurologie. Nervenheilkunde 27:933–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fritsche G, Kröner-Herwig B, Kropp P, Niederberger U, Haag G (2013) Psychologische Therapie der Migräne. Systematische Übersicht. Schmerz 27:263–274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kropp P, Meyer B, Dresler T, Fritsche G, Gaul C, Niederberger U, Förderreuther S, Malzacher V, Jürgens TP, Marziniak M, Straube A (2017) Entspannungsverfahren und verhaltenstherapeutische Interventionen zur Behandlung der Migräne. Leitlinie der Deutschen Migräne- und Kopfschmerzgesellschaft. Schmerz. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-017-0214-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bernstein DA, Borkovec TD (1973) Progressive relaxation training: a manual for the helping professions. IL Research Press, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  19. Diezemann A (2011) Entspannungsverfahren bei chronischem Schmerz. Schmerz 25:445–453

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Campbell JK, Penzien DB, Wall EM (2000) Evidence-based guidelines for migraine headache: behavioral and physical treatments. US Headache Consortium. http://tools.aan.com/professionals/practice/pdfs/gl0098.pdf. Zugegriffen: 02.07.2018

  21. Hay KM, Madders J (1971) Migraine treated by relaxation therapy. J R Coll Gen Pract 21:664–669

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mitchell KR, Mitchell DM (1971) Migraine: an exploratory treatment application of programmed behaviour therapy techniques. J Psychosom Res 15:137–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Paulley JW, Haskell DA (1975) The treatment of migraine without drugs. J Psychosom Res 19:367–374

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Blanchard EB, Theobald DE, Williamson DA, Silver BV, Brown DA (1978) Temperature biofeedback in the treatment of migraine headaches: a controlled evaluation. Arch Gen Psychiatry 35:581–588

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Silver BV, Blanchard EB, Williamson DA, Theobald DE, Brown DA (1979) Temperature biofeedback and relaxation training in the treatment of migraine headaches. One-year follow-up. Self Regul 4:359–366

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Attfield M, Peck DF (1979) Temperature self-regulation and relaxation with migraine patients and normals. Behav Res Ther 17:591–595

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Daly EJ, Donn PA, Galliher MJ, Zimmerman JS (1983) Biofeedback applications to migraine and tension headaches: a double-blinded outcome study. Biofeedback Self Regul 8:135–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Williamson DA, Monguillot JE, Jarrell MP, Cohen RA, Pratt JM, Blouin DC (1984) Relaxation for the treatment of headache. Controlled evaluation of two group programs. Behav Modif 8:407–424

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Blanchard EB, Andrasik F, Evans DD, Hillhouse J (1985) Biofeedback and relaxation treatments for headache in the elderly: a caution and a challenge. Biofeedback Self Regul 10:69–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Janssen K, Neutgens J (1986) Autogenic training and progressive relaxation in the treatment of three kinds of headache. Behav Res Ther 24:199–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Marcus DA, Scharff L, Mercer S, Turk DC (1998) Nonpharmacological treatment for migraine: incremental utility of physical therapy with relaxation and thermal biofeedback. Cephalalgia 18:266–272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. D’Souza PJ, Lumley MA, Kraft CA, Dooley JA (2008) Relaxation training and written emotional disclosure for tension or migraine headaches: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Behav Med 36:21–32

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Varkey E, Cider A, Carlsson J, Linde M (2011) Exercise as migraine prophylaxis: a randomized study using relaxation and topiramate as controls. Cephalalgia 31:1428–1438

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wachholtz AB, Malone CD, Pargament KI (2015) Effect of different meditation types on migraine headache medication use. Behav Med 11:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  35. International Headache Society (1988) Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Cephalalgia 7(8 Suppl):1–96

    Google Scholar 

  36. Penzien DB, Rains JC, Andrasik F (2002) Behavioral management of recurrent headache: three decades of experience and empiricism. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 27:163–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nestoriuc Y, Martin A (2007) Efficacy of biofeedback for migraine: a meta-analysis. Pain 128:111–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Goslin RE, Gray RN, McCrory DC, Penzien D, Rains J, Hasselblad V (1999) Behavioral and physical treatments for migraine headache. AHRQ Technical Reviews No. 2.2.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Holroyd KA, Penzien DB (1990) Pharmacological versus non-pharmacological prophylaxis of recurrent migraine headache: a meta-analytic review of clinical trials. Pain 42:1–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Sargent J, Solbach P, Coyne L, Spohn H, Segerson J (1986) Results of a controlled, experimental, outcome study of nondrug treatments for the control of migraine headaches. J Behav Med 9:291–323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Gauthier J, Lacroix R, Cote A, Doyon J, Drolet M (1985) Biofeedback control of migraine headaches—a comparison of 2 approaches. Biofeedback Self Regul 10:139–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Litt MD (1986) Mediating factors in non-medical treatment for migraine headache: toward an interactional model. J Psychosom Res 30:505–519

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Tracey I, Ploghaus A, Gati JS et al (2002) Imaging attentional modulation of pain in the periaqueductal gray in humans. J Neurosci 22:2748–2752

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kropp P, Gerber WD (1998) Prediction of migraine attacks using a slow cortical potential, the contingent negative variation. Neurosci Lett 257:73–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Rasch B, Friese M, Hofmann W, Naumann E (2014) Quantitative Methoden. Einführung in die Statistik für Psychologen und Sozialwissenschaftler. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kropp P, Linstedt U, Gerber WD (2005) Migräne. Die Dauer der Erkrankung beeinflusst Amplitude und Habituation ereigniskorrelierter Potenziale. Schmerz 19(6):489–496

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Kropp P, Wallasch TM, Muller B, Meyer B, Darabaneanu S, Bosse C et al (2015) Disease duration of episodic migraine correlates with modified amplitudes and habituation of contingent negative variation. J Neural Transm 122(6):877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Bortz J (1999) Statistik für Sozialwissenschaftler. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  49. Jasper HH (1958) The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 10:371–375

    Google Scholar 

  50. Böcker KB, Timsit-Berthier M, Schoenen J, Brunia CH (1990) Contingent negative variation in migraine. Headache 30(9):604–609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Darabaneanu S, Kropp P, Niederberger U, Strenge H, Gerber WD (2008) Effects of pregnancy on slow cortical potentials in migraine patients and healthy controls. Cephalalgia 28(10):1053–1060

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Kropp P, Siniatchkin M, Gerber WD (2000) Contingent negative variation as indicator of duration of migraine disease. Funct Neurol 15(3):78–81

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147, Rostock, Deutschland

    B. Meyer, A. Keller, B. Müller, H.-G. Wöhlbier & P. Kropp

Authors
  1. B. Meyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Keller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. Müller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. H.-G. Wöhlbier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. P. Kropp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Meyer.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

B. Meyer erhielt eine Forschungsförderung der Deutschen Migräne- und Kopfschmerzgesellschaft (DMKG) für die Durchführung der Studie „PMR bei Migräne – Einfluss auf den Krankheitsverlauf“. A. Keller, B. Müller, H.-G. Wöhlbier und P. Kropp geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Alle Untersuchungen wurden mit Zustimmung der Ethikkommission der Universitätsmedizin Rostock, im Einklang mit nationalem Recht sowie gemäß der Deklaration von Helsinki von 1975 durchgeführt. Von allen beteiligten Personen liegt eine Einverständniserklärung vor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meyer, B., Keller, A., Müller, B. et al. Progressive Muskelrelaxation nach Jacobson bei der Migräneprophylaxe. Schmerz 32, 250–258 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-018-0305-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-018-0305-7

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

search

Navigation