Skip to main content
Log in

Schmerz ist modalitätsspezifisch

Unterschiede in der Wahrnehmung und Verarbeitung interozeptiver viszeraler im Vergleich zu exterozeptiven kutanen thermischen Schmerzreizen

Pain is modality-specific

Differences in the perception and processing of interoceptive visceral compared to exteroceptive cutaneous heat pain stimuli

  • Neues aus der Forschung
  • Published:
Der Schmerz Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Interozeptive viszerale Schmerzreize werden im Vergleich zu exterozeptiven kutanen thermischen Schmerzreizen von gesunden Frauen als stärker angstauslösend und unangenehmer bewertet, selbst wenn die Reize hinsichtlich der wahrgenommenen Schmerzintensität angepasst sind. Beide Schmerzreize induzieren eine vergleichbare Aktivierung in Hirnarealen sensorisch-diskriminativer Schmerzverarbeitung. Für viszerale Schmerzreize zeigt sich jedoch auch eine stärkere Aktivierung in Hirnarealen, die mit Salienzverarbeitung und absteigender Schmerzhemmung assoziiert sind, selbst wenn die Ergebnisse für intraindividuelle Bewertungsunterschiede in der Schmerzintensität kontrolliert werden. Insbesondere schmerzinduzierte Angst spielt für die Bewertung viszeraler Schmerzen eine entscheidende Rolle.

Abstract

Interoceptive visceral pain is perceived as more fear-inducing and unpleasant compared to cutaneous heat pain in healthy women even when stimuli are matched for perceived pain intensity. On a neural level, both pain stimuli induce comparable neural activation in areas related to processing of sensory-discriminative pain aspects. However, enhanced neural responses are observed in areas associated with salience processing and descending pain inhibition for the visceral pain modality, even when results are controlled for intra-individual differences in perceived pain intensity. Moreover, immanent fear of pain is suggested to play a distinctive role in perception of visceral pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1

Notes

  1. Interessant ist nebenbei, dass das Reizdarmsyndrom, welches in der Fachliteratur als viszerales chronisches Schmerzsyndrom beschrieben ist, darunter nicht gefasst wird, sondern unter dem Punkt „somatoforme autonome Funktionsstörungen“ (F45.3).

Literatur

  1. Arendt-Nielsen L, Laursen RJ, Drewes AM (2000) Referred pain as an indicator for neural plasticity. Prog Brain Res 129:343–356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aziz Q, Thompson DG, Ng VW et al (2000) Cortical processing of human somatic and visceral sensation. J Neurosci 20:2657–2663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cervero F (2009) Visceral versus somatic pain: similarities and differences. Dig Dis 27(Suppl 1):3–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dunckley P, Wise RG, Aziz Q et al (2005) Cortical processing of visceral and somatic stimulation: differentiating pain intensity from unpleasantness. Neuroscience 133:533–542

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dunckley P, Wise RG, Fairhurst M et al (2005) A comparison of visceral and somatic pain processing in the human brainstem using functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 25:7333–7341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Elsenbruch S, Hauser W, Janig W (2015) Visceral pain. Schmerz 29:496–502

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Price CJ et al (1999) Multisubject fMRI studies and conjunction analyses. Neuroimage 10:385–396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fruhstorfer H, Lindblom U, Schmidt WC (1976) Method for quantitative estimation of thermal thresholds in patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 39:1071–1075

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gebhart GF (2000) Pathobiology of visceral pain: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications IV. Visceral afferent contributions to the pathobiology of visceral pain. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 278:G834–G838

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. George SZ, Dannecker EA, Robinson ME (2006) Fear of pain, not pain catastrophizing, predicts acute pain intensity, but neither factor predicts tolerance or blood pressure reactivity: An experimental investigation in pain-free individuals. Eur J Pain 10:457–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hauser W, Grandt D (2002) Psychophysiology of visceral pain syndromes. Schmerz 16:460–466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hobday DI, Aziz Q, Thacker N et al (2001) A study of the cortical processing of ano-rectal sensation using functional MRI. Brain 124:361–368

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Icenhour A, Labrenz F, Ritter C et al (2017) Learning by experience? Visceral pain-related neural and behavioral responses in a classical conditioning paradigm. Neurogastroenterol Motil. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13026

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Koenen LR, Icenhour A, Forkmann K et al (2017) Greater fear of visceral pain contributes to differences between visceral and somatic pain in healthy women. Pain 158(8):1599–1608

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Labrenz F, Icenhour A, Benson S et al (2015) Contingency awareness shapes acquisition and extinction of emotional responses in a conditioning model of pain-related fear. Front Behav Neurosci 9:318

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Mayer EA, Gupta A, Kilpatrick LA et al (2015) Imaging brain mechanisms in chronic visceral pain. Pain 156(Suppl 1):S50–S63

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Mertz H, Naliboff B, Munakata J et al (1995) Altered rectal perception is a biological marker of patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 109:40–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Meulders A, Vlaeyen JW (2012) Reduction of fear of movement-related pain and pain-related anxiety: an associative learning approach using a voluntary movement paradigm. Pain 153:1504–1513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nilges P, Rief W (2010) F45.41: chronic pain disorder with somatic and psychological factors: a coding aid. Schmerz 24:209–212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ptak R (2012) The frontoparietal attention network of the human brain: action, saliency, and a priority map of the environment. Neuroscientist 18:502–515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmidt K, Schunke O, Forkmann K et al (2015) Enhanced short-term sensitization of facial compared with limb heat pain. J Pain 16:781–790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Seeley WW, Menon V, Schatzberg AF et al (2007) Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. J Neurosci 27:2349–2356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Sommer C, Hauser W, Burgmer M et al (2012) Etiology and pathophysiology of fibromyalgia syndrome. Schmerz 26:259–267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vlaeyen JW, Linton SJ (2012) Fear-avoidance model of chronic musculoskeletal pain: 12 years on. Pain 153:1144–1147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wiech K (2016) Deconstructing the sensation of pain: the influence of cognitive processes on pain perception. Science 354:584–587

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wiech K, Lin CS, Brodersen KH et al (2010) Anterior insula integrates information about salience into perceptual decisions about pain. J Neurosci 30:16324–16331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Elsenbruch.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

L.R. Koenen und S. Elsenbruch geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Alle beschriebenen Untersuchungen am Menschen wurden mit Zustimmung der zuständigen Ethik-Kommission, im Einklang mit nationalem Recht sowie gemäß der Deklaration von Helsinki von 1975 (in der aktuellen, überarbeiteten Fassung) durchgeführt. Von allen beteiligten Patienten liegt eine Einverständniserklärung vor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koenen, L.R., Elsenbruch, S. Schmerz ist modalitätsspezifisch. Schmerz 32, 139–143 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-018-0281-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-018-0281-y

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation