Skip to main content
Log in

Multimodale Therapie bei chronischem HWS- und LWS-Schmerz

Ergebnisse einer prospektiven Vergleichsstudie

Multimodal therapy patients with chronic cervical and lumbar pain

Results of a comparative prospective study

  • Originalien
  • Published:
Der Schmerz Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Die multimodale Schmerztherapie ist beim chronischen LWS-Schmerz etabliert, Studien über Ergebnisse bei Patienten mit chronischen HWS-Beschwerden sind rar.

Methode

Diese prospektive klinische Studie vergleicht die Ergebnisse nach einer 3-wöchigen multimodalen Schmerztherapie bei aufgrund von chronischen HWS- (n=97) oder LWS-Schmerzen (n=231) arbeitsunfähigen Patienten. Beide Gruppen wurden zu Beginn und nach 6 Monaten hinsichtlich der Parameter Arbeitsfähigkeit, klinische Funktion und Schmerzausmaß untersucht.

Ergebnisse

In beiden Gruppen zeigte sich nach 6 Monaten eine signifikante Verbesserung hinsichtlich aller erhobenen Parameter. Hinsichtlich der Outcomeparameter Funktionskapazität und Arbeitsfähigkeit zeigten sich keine signifikanten Unterschiede in beiden Gruppen, 67,4% kehrten in der Gesamtgruppe wieder zur Arbeit zurück. Die LWS-Gruppe zeigte nach 6 Monaten allerdings ein signifikant geringeres Schmerzausmaß als die HWS-Gruppe.

Schlussfolgerung

Die multimodale Schmerztherapie stellt auch für Patienten mit chronischem HWS-Schmerz eine effiziente Therapieform dar, wie es zuvor in Studien bereits für den chronischen LWS-Schmerz gezeigt worden war.

Abstract

Background

Multimodal therapy has been established for patients with chronic low back pain, but studies reporting results in patients with chronic neck pain are rare.

Methods

This prospective clinical study compared the results in 97 patients with chronic cervical pain and 231 patients with chronic lumbar pain after three weeks of multimodal therapy. The following factors were analyzed in both groups at the beginning and after 6 months: ability to work, pain intensity and functional back capacity.

Results

Both groups had improved significantly after 6 months in all outcome parameters. Functional back capacity and ability to work at 6 months were not different between the two groups, but pain intensity was significantly lower in patients with low back pain compared to patients with neck pain.

Conclusion

Multimodal therapy is also an efficient treatment strategy for patients with chronic cervical pain as has already been shown for patients with chronic lumbar pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Bendix AF, Bendix T, Haestrup C (1998) Can it be predicted which patients with chronic low back pain should be offered tertiary rehabilitation in a functional restoration program? A search for demographic, socioeconomic, and physical predictors. Spine 23: 1775–1783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bronfort G, Evans R, Nelson B, Aker PD, Goldsmith CD, Vernon H (2001) A randomized clinical trial of exercise and spinal manipulation for patients with chronic neck pain. Spine 26: 788–797

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Crombez G, Vlaeyen JWS, Heuts PH, Lysens R (1999) Pain-related fear is more disabling than pain itself: evidence on the role of pain-related fear in chronic back pain disability. Pain 80: 329–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ekberg K, Bjorkqvist B, Malm P, Bjerre-Kiely B, Axelson O (1994) Controlled two year follow up of rehabilitation for disorders in the neck and shoulders. Occup Environ Med 51: 833–838

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ekberg K, Karlsson M, Axelson O, Bjorkvist B, Bjerre-Kiely B (1995) Cross-sectional study of risk factors for symptoms in the neck and shoulder area. Ergonomics 38: 971–980

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. George S, Fritz J, Erhard RE (2001) A comparison of fear-avoidance beliefs in patients with lumbar spine pain and cervical spine pain. Spine 26: 2139–2145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Guzman J, Esmail R, Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Irvin E, Bombardier C (2001) Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: systematic review. BMJ 322: 1511–1516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Harvey N, Cooper C (2005) Physiotherapy for neck and back pain. We need to know who will benefit from which intervention. BMJ 330: 53–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hasenbring M, Hallner D, Klasen B (2001) Psychologische Mechanismen im Prozess der Schmerzchronifizierung. Unter- oder überbewertet? Schmerz 15: 442–447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hautzinger M, Bailer M (1993) Allgemeine Depressionsskala (ADS). Die deutsche Version des CES-D. Beltz Test, Weinheim

  11. Hildebrandt J, Pfingsten M, Franz C, Seeger D, Saur P (1996) Das Göttinger Rücken Intensiv Programm (GRIP), Teil 1: Ergebnisse im Überblick. Schmerz 10: 190–203

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Horneij E, Hemborg B, Jensen I, Ekdahl C (2001) No significant differences between intervention programmes on neck, shoulder and low back pain: a prospective randomized study among home-care personnel. J Rehabil Med 33: 170–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jensen I, Nygren A, Gamberale F, Goldie I, Westerholm P, Jonsson E (1995) The role of the psychologist in multidisciplinary treatment for chronic neck and shoulder pain: a controlled cost-effectiveness study. Scand J Rehabil Med 27: 19–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jordan A, Bendix T, Nielsen H, Hansen FR, Host D, Winkel A (1998) Intensive training, physiotherapy, or manipulation for patients with chronic neck pain. A prospective, single-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Spine 23: 311–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Tulder M van, Roine R, Jauhiainen M, Hurri H, Koes B (2001) Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for neck and shoulder pain among working age adults: a systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine 26: 174–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Koes BW, Bouter LM, Mameren H van, Essers AH, Verstegen GM, Hofhuisen DM, Homben JP, Knipschild PG (1992) Randomized clinical trial of manipulative therapy and physiotherapy for persistent back and neck complaints: results of one year follow-up. BMJ 304: 601–605

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kohlmann T, Raspe HH (1996) Der Funktionsfragebogen Hannover zur alltagsnahen Diagnostik der Funktionsbeeinträchtigung durch Rückenschmerzen (FFbH-R). Rehabilitation 35: 1–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Leclerc A, Niedhammer I, Landre M, Ozguler A, Etore P, Pietri-Taleb F (1999) One-year predictive factors for various aspects of neck disorders. Spine 24: 1455–1462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Linton SJ (2000) A review of psychosocial risk factors in back and neck pain. Spine 25: 1148–1156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nachemson A, Jonsson E (2000) Neck and back pain: the scientific evidence of causes, diagnosis, and treatment. Lippincott Williams & Williams, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pfingsten M, Hildebrandt J, Leibing E, Franz C, Saur P (1997) Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary treatment program for chronic low-back pain. Pain 73: 77–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Polatin PB, Gatchel RJ, Barnes D, Mayer H, Arens C, Mayer T (1989) A psycho-socio-medical prediction model of response to treatment by chronically disabled workers with low back pain. Spine 14: 956–961

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rose MJ, Klenerman L, Atchison L, Slade PD (1992) An application of the fear-avoidance model to three chronic pain problems. Behav Res Ther 30: 359–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schonstein E, Kenny D, Keating J, Koes B, Herbert RD (2003) Physical conditioning programs for workers with back and neck pain: a Cochrane systematic review. Spine 28: E391–E395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Swenson RS (2003) Therapeutic modalities in the management of nonspecific neck pain. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 14: 605–627

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Taimela S, Takala E, Asklöf T, Seppälä K, Parviainen S (2000) Active treatment of chronic neck pain: a prospective randomized intervention. Spine 25: 1021–1027

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Van Tulder MW, Koes BW (2002) Chronic low back pain and sciatica. Clin Evid 7: 1032–1048

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Victor L, Richeimer SM (2003) Psychosocial therapies for neck pain. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 14: 643–657

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Waddell G (1998) The clinical course of low back pain. In: Waddell G (ed) The back pain revolution. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh London New York, pp 103–107

  30. Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I, Somerville D, Main CJ (1993) A fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain 52: 157–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wright A, Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ (1999) Outcomes of disabling cervical spine disorders in compensation injuries: a prospective comparison to tertiary rehabilitation response for chronic lumbar spine disorders. Spine 24: 178–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt:

Der korrespondierende Autor versichert, dass keine Verbindungen mit einer Firma, deren Produkt in dem Artikel genannt ist, oder einer Firma, die ein Konkurrenzprodukt vertreibt, bestehen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Buchner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neubauer, E., Zahlten-Hinguranage, A., Schiltenwolf, M. et al. Multimodale Therapie bei chronischem HWS- und LWS-Schmerz. Schmerz 20, 210–218 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-005-0434-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-005-0434-7

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation