Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Die Repräsentation medizinethischer Literatur in bibliographischen Datenbanken und Indizes

  • Informationen
  • Published:
Ethik in der Medizin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1.
Abb. 2.

Notes

  1. Zeitschriften mit zwei Erscheinungsorten in unterschiedlichen Regionen wurden nicht mitgezählt.

Literatur

  1. Anonym (2001) After BIOETHICSLINE: online searching of the bioethics literature. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 11:387–389

  2. Editorial (1976) Finding the other literature of medicine. Ann Intern Med 84:488–489

  3. Fangerau H, Simon A, Wiesemann C (2002) Improving information systems in Europe: EURETHNET. Med Health Care Philos (in press)

  4. John K (1985) Medical literature searches—how many bibliographic databases are needed for sufficient retrieval in medical topics? Methods Inf Med 24:163–165

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marsh SS (1987) Bibliography of Bioethics and Index Medicus: comparison of coverage, publication delay, and ease of recall for journal articles on bioethics. Bull Med Libr Assoc 75:248–252

    Google Scholar 

  6. McDonald S, Taylor L, Adams C (1999) Searching the right database for psychiatry journals. Health Libr Rev 16:151–156

    Google Scholar 

  7. National Reference Center for Bioethics Literature (2000) Scope note 38: bioethics resources on the web. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 10:175–188

  8. Obst O (2000) Datenbanken auf dem Prüfstand: Ist Medline eine Luftnummer? AGMB aktuell 7:24–27

    Google Scholar 

  9. Singer PA, Miles SH, Siegler M (1990) Computer searches of the medical ethics literature. J Clin Ethics 1:195–198

    Google Scholar 

  10. Suarez-Almazor ME, Belseck E, Homik J, Dorgan M, Ramos-Remus C (2000) Identifying clinical trials in the medical literature with electronic databases: MEDLINE alone is not enough. Control Clin Trials 21:476–487

    Google Scholar 

  11. Topfer LA, Parada A, Menon D, Noorani H, Perras C, Serra-Prat M (1999) Comparison of literature searches on quality and costs for health technology assessment using the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 15:297–303

    Google Scholar 

  12. Woods D, Trewheellar K (1998) Medline and Embase complement each other in literature searches. BMJ 316:1166

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Danksagung.

Ich danke Frau Prof. Dr. C. Wiesemann, Göttingen, für ihre konstruktive Kritik und Mithilfe bei der Erstellung dieser Arbeit.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Abteilung für Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Göttingen

    Heiner Fangerau

  2. Abteilung für Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Göttingen, Humboldtallee 36, 37073, Göttingen, Deutschland

    Heiner Fangerau

Authors
  1. Heiner Fangerau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fangerau, H. Die Repräsentation medizinethischer Literatur in bibliographischen Datenbanken und Indizes. Ethik Med 15, 122–127 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00481-003-0226-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00481-003-0226-5

Search

Navigation