Skip to main content
Log in

Uncertainty analysis of simplified 1D and 2D shallow water equations via the Karhunen–Loéve expansion and Monte Carlo simulations

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The stochastic solution of wave propagation through simplified shallow water equations, described by a system of 1D and 2D linear equations, has been investigated by considering the initial condition as a source of uncertainty. The Karhunen–Loéve expansion (KLE) method is applied as an alternative approach to the Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) method. Uncertainty associated with moments of the flow characteristics is quantified. The initial condition \({H}_{0}\), considered as the input random field, is decomposed in the form of a set of orthogonal Gaussian random variables \(\left\{{\xi }_{i}\right\}\). The coefficients of the series are related to eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the covariance function of \({H}_{0}\). The flow depth \(H\) and flow velocities \(U\) and V are expanded as an infinite series whose terms H(n), U(n) and V(n) represent depth and velocities of the nth order, respectively, and a set of recursive equations is derived for H(n), U(n) and V(n). Then, H(n), U(n) and V(n) are decomposed with polynomial expansions in terms of the products of \({\xi }_{i}\) so that their coefficients are determined by replacing decompositions of H0, H(n), U(n) and V(n) into those recursive equations. MCS is conducted, in which the mean and variances of the flow depth \(H\) and flow velocities \(U\) and V are compared against approximations of the KLE results, with the same accuracy as MCS, yet with much less computation time and effort.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott MB, Basco DR (1989) Computational fluid dynamics. Longman Scientific and Technical, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazargan H, Christie M, Elsheikh AH, Ahmadi M (2015) Surrogate accelerated sampling of reservoir models with complex structures using sparse polynomial chaos expansion. Adv Water Resour 86:385–399

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ceyhan MS, Kavvas ML (2018) Ensemble modeling of the Theis equation under uncertain parameter conditions. J Hydrol Eng 23(5):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunge J, Holly FM, Verwey A (1980) Practical aspects of computational river hydraulics. Pitman Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Debusschere BJ, Najm HN, Pébay PP, Knio OM, Ghanem RG, Le Maître OP (2004) Numerical challenges in the use of polynomial chaos representations for stochastic processes. SIAM J Sci Comput 26(2):698–719

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dihan D, Epshteyn Y, Narayan A (2022) Hyperbolicity-preserving and well-balanced stochastic Galerkin method for two-dimensional shallow water equations. J Comput Phys 452:110901

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dutykh D, Katsaounis T, Mitsotakis D (2011) Dispersive wave run-up on non-uniform shores. In: Fořt J, Fürst J, Halama J, Herbin R, Hubert F (eds) Finite volumes for complex applications VI problems and perspectives. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 389–397

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • El Moçayd N, Mohamed MS, Ouazar D, Seaid M (2020) Stochastic model reduction for polynomial chaos expansion of acoustic waves using proper orthogonal decomposition. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 195:106733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates TK, Al-Zahrani MA (1996a) Spatiotemporal stochastic open-channel flow. I: model and its parameter data. J Hydraul Eng 122(11):641–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates TK, Al-Zahrani MA (1996b) Spatiotemporal stochastic open-channel flow. II: simulation experiments. J Hydraul Eng 122(11):652–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge L, Cheung KF, Kobayashi MH (2008) Stochastic solution for uncertainty propagation in nonlinear shallow-water equations. J Hydraul Eng 134(12):1732–1743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghanem RG, Spanos PD (2003) Stochastic finite elements: a spectral approach. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goda K, Alcala KM (2023) Stochastic source modelling and tsunami hazard analysis of the 2012 M w7. 8 Haida Gwaii Earthquake. Pure Appl Geophys 180(5):1599–1621

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Haijiao Y, Wen X, Wu M, Sheng D, Wu J, Zhao Y (2022) Data-based groundwater quality estimation and uncertainty analysis for irrigation agriculture. Agric Water Manag 262:107423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y, Nan Z, Yang S (2013) Risk assessment of water quality using Monte Carlo simulation and artificial neural network method. J Environ Manag 122:130–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khorshidi H, Talebbeydokhti N, Rakhshandehroo G (2016) High-order perturbation approach for wave transformation by applying advection-diffusion equation via Karhunen–Loeve expansion. ASCE ASME J Risk Uncertain Eng Syst A Civ 3(1):04016011

    Google Scholar 

  • Khorshidi H, Talebbeydokhti N, Rakhshandehroo G (2017) Uncertainty analysis of open channel flow: stochastic approach to Advection–Diffusion equation. Sci Iran 24(5):2262–2270

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohanpur AH, Saksena S, Dey S, Johnson JM, Riasi MS, Yeghiazarian L, Tartakovsky AM (2023) Urban flood modeling: uncertainty quantification and physics-informed Gaussian processes regression forecasting. Water Resour Res 59(3):e2022WR033939

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee G, Cho Y (2018) Semi-analytical Karhunen–Loeve representation of irregular waves based on the prolate spheroidal wave functions. J Comput Phys 352:172–189

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Leveque RJ (2002) Finite volume methods for hyperbolic problems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Li H, Zhang D (2007) Probabilistic collocation method for flow in porous media: Comparisons with other stochastic methods. Water Resour Res 43(9):W09409

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Tchelepi HA, Zhang D (2003) Perturbation-based moment equation approach for flow in heterogeneous porous media: applicability range and analysis of high-order terms. J Comput Phys 188(1):296–317

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Zhang D, He T, Zheng Q (2023) Uncertainty quantification of two-phase flow in porous media via the Coupled-TgNN surrogate model. Geoenergy Sci Eng 221:211368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu DS, Matthies HG (2008) Numerical treatment of shallow water equations with uncertain parameters. In: 8th World Congress on Computational Mechanics and 5th European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering. CIMNE, Barcelona

  • Liu D (2010) Uncertainty quantification with shallow water equations. Dissertation, University of Florence

  • Oana L, Crisan D, Mémin E (2023) Analytical properties for a stochastic rotating shallow water model under location uncertainty. J Math Fluid Mech 25(2):29

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sattar AM (2016) A probabilistic projection of the transient flow equations with random system parameters and internal boundary conditions. J Hydraul Res 54(3):342–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Supraba I, Yamada TJ (2015) Uncertainty of Peak Runoff Height Associated with Uncertainty of Water Holding Capacity and Rainfall Pattern. 土木学会論文集 G (環境), 71(5): I17-I22

  • Szymkiewicz R (2010) Numerical modeling in open channel hydraulics. Springer Science and Business Media, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tipireddy R, Barajas-Solano DA, Tartakovsky AM (2020) Conditional Karhunen–Loeve expansion for uncertainty quantification and active learning in partial differential equation models. J Comput Phys 418:109604

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tu T, Ercan A, Kavvas ML (2019) One-dimensional solute transport in open channel flow from a stochastic systematic perspective. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 33(7):1403–1418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu T, Ercan A, Kavvas ML (2020) Modeling one-dimensional nonreactive solute transport in open channel flows under uncertain flow and solute loading conditions. J Hydrol Eng 25(8):04020035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weihong L, Anjia J (2021) A quasi-Monte Carlo method based on the Karhunen–Loeve expansion for groundwater flow simulation. J Simul 97(10):677–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiu D, Karniadakis GE (2002) Modeling uncertainty in steady state diffusion problems via generalized polynomial chaos. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191(43):4927–4948

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Xudong F, Zhang X, Yu XB (2023) Uncertainty quantification of a deep learning model for failure rate prediction of water distribution networks. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 236:109088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D, Lu Z (2004) An efficient, high-order perturbation approach for flow in random porous media via Karhunen–Loeve and polynomial expansions. J Comput Phys 194(2):773–794

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by SHM, HK and RS. The first draft of the manuscript was written by HK and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hossein Khorshidi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malekhosseini, S.H., Khorshidi, H. & Szymkiewicz, R. Uncertainty analysis of simplified 1D and 2D shallow water equations via the Karhunen–Loéve expansion and Monte Carlo simulations. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 38, 1051–1070 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-023-02613-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-023-02613-y

Keywords

Navigation