Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analysis of land use/land cover change (LULCC) and debris flow risks in Adama district, Ethiopia, aided by numerical simulation and deep learning-based remote sensing

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Detecting land use/land cover change (LULCC) and assessing the risk of slope failure and debris flow has been a worldwide concern. This study is the first in Adama District, Ethiopia, to use deep learning (DL)-based remote sensing to assess LULCC and predict the risk of slope failures and debris flows using numerical simulation methods. This study uses DL and remote sensing to analyse the spatiotemporal changes in LULC and landslide sites. The enhanced detection of debris flow susceptibility areas enabled the precise prediction of these areas’ location and sphere of influence and the precise evaluation of debris flow risk. This led to a reduction in the losses caused by such disasters. Changes in the six classes of LULC were assessed with an overall accuracy of above 87% and an overall kappa statistic of 85%. The results revealed a decreased trend in grassland, shrubland, and bareland over 30 years (1991–2021) of − 31.03 km2, − 38.15 km2, and − 114.19 km2, respectively. Also, a recent analysis of land-use maps from the past three decades reveals that the built-up area has increased significantly, from 0.95% to 5.64%. In contrast, shrubland has decreased notably, from 12.01 to 7.78% since 2021. These changes suggest that human activity significantly impacts the landscape, and that more needs to be done to protect our natural resources. The depth-integrated particle method flow simulation technique reveals high landslide risk in Adama City and Wonji sugar cane fields, aiding decision-makers in reducing damage and limiting over-cultivation in high-risk areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All the data supporting this study’s findings are available within the manuscript.

References

  • Adnan MS, Rahman MS, Ahmed N, Ahmed B, Rabbi MF, Rahman RM (2020) Improving spatial agreement in machine learning-based landslide susceptibility mapping. Remote Sens 12(20):3347

    Google Scholar 

  • Alemayehu D, Tadesse M (2018) Application of TPI for analysis of landforms and LULC of Adama Wereda, Ethiopia. J Geograph Stud 2:100–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali SA, Parvin F, Vojteková J, Costache R, Linh NT, Pham QB, Vojtek M, Gigović L, Ahmad A, Ghorbani MA (2021) GIS-based landslide susceptibility modeling: a comparison between fuzzy multi-criteria and machine learning algorithms. Geosci Front 12(2):857–876

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen-Zhu Z, Li Y, Song Z (2019) A convergence theory for deep learning via over-parameterization. In: international conference on machine learning, pp 242–252

  • Al-Quraishi AMF, Negm AM (2020) Environmental remote sensing and GIS in Iraq. Springer Water, Springer, Cham

  • Anderson JR (1976) A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. US Government Printing Office

  • Asokan A, Anitha J (2019) Change detection techniques for remote sensing applications: a survey. Earth Sci Inf 12:143–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Bao Y, Chen J, Sun X, Han X, Li Y, Zhang Y, Gu F, Wang J (2019) Debris flow prediction and prevention in reservoir area based on finite volume type shallow-water model: a case study of pumped-storage hydroelectric power station site in Yi County, Hebei, China. Environ Earth Sci 78:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan R, Debnath R, Bandopadhyay S (2016) A conceptual model for identifying the risk susceptibility of urban green spaces using geo-spatial techniques. Model Earth Syst Environ 2:1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Berenguer M, Sempere-Torres D, Hürlimann M (2015) Debris-flow forecasting at regional scale by combining susceptibility mapping and radar rainfall. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 15:587–602

    Google Scholar 

  • Berihun ML, Tsunekawa A, Haregeweyn N, Dile YT, Tsubo M, Fenta AA, Meshesha DT, Ebabu K, Sultan D, Srinivasan R (2020) Evaluating runoff and sediment responses to soil and water conservation practices by employing alternative modeling approaches. Sci Total Environ 10:747–141118

    Google Scholar 

  • Bojer AK, Suryabhagavan KV, Mekasha ST, Al-Quraishi AMF (2023a) Climate change impacts on LULC in the Jarmet Wetland and its Surrounding Areas in Western Ethiopia. Hydro Spatial Anal 7(1):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Bojer K, Woldesilassie F, Debelee G, Kebede R, Esubalew Z (2023) AHP and machine learning-based military strategic site selection: a case study of Adea District East Shewa Zone, Ethiopia. J Sens 2023:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Cama M, Lombardo L, Conoscenti C, Rotigliano E (2017) Improving transferability strategies for debris flow susceptibility assessment: Application to the Saponara and Itala catchments (Messina, Italy). Geomorphology 1(288):52–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli M, Crema S, Trevisani S, Marchi L (2017) GIS tools for preliminary debris-flow assessment at regional scale. J Mt Sci 14(12):2498–2510

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Statistics Agency (CSA) (2007) National population statistics. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Central Statistical Authority, Addis Ababa

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Guo Z, Yin K, Shrestha DP, Jin S (2019) The influence of land use and land cover change on landslide susceptibility: a case study in Zhushan Town, Xuan’en County (Hubei, China). Nat Hazard 19(10):2207–2228

    Google Scholar 

  • Cundall PA, Strack OD (1979) A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique 29(1):47–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Deche A, Assen M, Damene S, Budds J, Kumsa A (2023) Dynamics and drivers of land use and land cover change in the upper awash basin, central rift valley of Ethiopia. Environ Manag 31:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Divya Y, Gopinathan P, Jayachandran K, Al-Quraishi AMF (2020) Color slices analysis of land use changes due to urbanization in a city environment of Miami Area, South Florida, USA. Model Earth Syst Environ 7:537–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias E, Seifu W, Tesfaye B, Girmay W (2019) Impact of land use/cover changes on lake ecosystem of Ethiopia central rift valley. Cogent Food Agricult 5(1):1595876

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) 2015 Global Forest Resources Assessment. Forestry Paper No.1.UN, Rome

  • Gameiro S, Riffel ES, de Oliveira GG, Guasselli LA (2021) Artificial neural networks applied to landslide susceptibility: The effect of sampling areas on model capacity for generalization and extrapolation. Appl Geogr 1(137):102598

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitima G, Teshome M, Kassie M, Jakubus M (2022) Spatiotemporal land use and cover changes across agroecologies and slope gradients using geospatial technologies in Zoa Watershed Southwest Ethiopia. Heliyon 8(9):e10696

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong P, Wang J, Yu L, Zhao Y, Zhao Y, Liang L, Niu Z, Huang X, Fu H, Liu S, Li C (2013) Finer resolution observation and monitoring of global land cover: first mapping results with Landsat TM and ETM+ data. Int J Remote Sens 34(7):2607–2654

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamedianfar A, Shafri HZ (2014) Development of fuzzy rule-based parameters for urban object-oriented classification using very high-resolution imagery. Geocarto Int 29(3):268–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Han X, Chen J, Xu P, Niu C, Zhan J (2018) Runout analysis of a potential debris flow in the Dongwopu gully based on a well-balanced numerical model over complex topography. Bull Eng Geol Env 77:679–689

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckmann T, Gegg K, Gegg A, Becht M (2014) Sample size matters: Investigating the effect of sample size on a logistic regression susceptibility model for debris flows. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 14:259–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain SA, Mondal I, Thakur S, Al-Quraishi AMF (2022) Coastal vulnerability assessment of India’s Purba Medinipur-Balasore coastal stretch: a comparative study using empirical models. Int J of Disaster Risk Reduction 77:103065

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang S, Tang L, Hupy JP, Wang Y, Shao G (2021) A commentary review on the use of normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) in the era of popular remote sensing. J Forest Res 32(1):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutter K, Svendsen B, Rickenmann D (1994) Debris flow modeling: a review. Continuum Mech Thermodyn 8:1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam K, Rahman F, Jashimuddin M (2018) Modeling land use change using cellular automata and artificial neural network: the case of chunati wildlife sanctuary. Banglad Ecol Indic 88:439–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaiswal P, van Westen CJ (2013) Use of quantitative landslide hazard and risk information for local disaster risk reduction along a transportation corridor: a case study from Nilgiri district, India. Nat Hazards 65:887–913

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamali A (2021) Land use land cover modeling using optimized machine learning classifiers: a case study of Shiraz Iran. Model Earth Syst Environ 7(3):1539–1550

    Google Scholar 

  • Javidan N, Kavian A, Pourghasemi R, Conoscenti C, Jafarian Z, Rodrigo-Comino J (2021) Evaluation of multi-hazard map produced using MaxEnt machine learning technique. Sci Rep 11:6496

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khwarahm N, Qader S, Ararat K, Al-Quraishi AMF (2021) Predicting and mapping land cover/land use changes in Erbil/Iraq using CA-Markov synergy model. Earth Sci Inform 14:393–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogan L, Fisseha S, Bendick R, Reilinger R, McClusky S, King R, Solomon T (2012) Lithospheric strength and strain localization in continental extension from observations of the East African Rift. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 117(B3):516

    Google Scholar 

  • Kritikos T, Davies T (2015) Assessment of rainfall-generated shallow landslide/debris-flow susceptibility and runout using a GIS-based approach: application to western Southern Alps of New Zealand. Landslides 12:1051–1075

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambin EF, Meyfroidt P (2011) Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(9):3465–3472

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lei T, Zhang Y, Lv Z, Li S, Liu S, Nandi AK (2019) Landslide inventory mapping from bitemporal images using deep convolutional neural networks. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 16(6):982–986

    Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Gu S, Liu W, Han H, Zhang Q (2008) Water quality in relation to land use and land cover in the upper Han River Basin. China Catena 75(2):216–222

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Chen W, Rezaie F, Rahmati O, Davoudi Moghaddam D, Tiefenbacher J, Panahi M, Lee J, Kulakowski D, Tien Bui D (2022) Debris flows modeling using geo-environmental factors: developing hybridized deep-learning algorithms. Geocarto Int 37:5150–5173

    Google Scholar 

  • Liping C, Yujun S, Saeed S, Westergaard-Nielsen A (2018) Monitoring and predicting land use and land cover changes using remote sensing and GIS technique. A case study of a hilly area, Jiangle China. PLoS ONE 13(7):1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Liu L, Weng S, Guo C, Dang Q, Xu H, Wang L, Lu T, Zhang Y, Sun Z, Han X (2022) Machine learning-based integration develops an immune-derived lncRNA signature for improving outcomes in colorectal cancer. Nat Commun 13(1):816

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu P, Qin Y, Li Z, Mondini AC, Casagli N (2019) Landslide mapping from multi-sensor data through improved change detection-based Markov random field. Remote Sens Environ 15(231):111235

    Google Scholar 

  • Maiti P, Kuniyal JC, Sekar KC, Satish KV, Singh D, Bisht N, Kumar A, Arya SC, Nand M, Sundriyal RC (2022) Landscape level ecological assessment and eco-restoration strategies for alpine and sub-alpine regions of the Central Himalaya. Ecol Eng 1(180):106674

    Google Scholar 

  • Mewa G, Mengistu F (2022) Assessment of landslide risk in ethiopia: distributions, causes, and impacts. IntechOpen, London. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.101023

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morvan H, Knight D, Wright N, Tang X, Crossley A (2008) The concept of roughness in fluvial hydraulics and its formulation in 1D, 2D and 3D numerical simulation models. J Hydraul Res 46(2):191–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen VT, Tran TH, Ha NA, Ngo VL, Nadhir AA, Tran VP, Duy Nguyen H, Malek MA, Amini A, Prakash I, Ho LS (2019) GIS based novel hybrid computational intelligence models for mapping landslide susceptibility: a case study at da lat city Vietnam. Sustainability 11(24):7118

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastor M, Blanc T, Haddad B, Petrone S, Sanchez Morles M, Drempetic V, Issler D, Crosta GB, Cascini L, Sorbino G, Cuomo S (2014) Application of a SPH depth-integrated model to landslide run-out analysis. Landslides 11:793–812

    Google Scholar 

  • Pham BT, Nguyen MD, Nguyen-Thoi T, Ho LS, Koopialipoor M, Quoc NK, Armaghani DJ, Van Le H (2021) A novel approach for classification of soils based on laboratory tests using Adaboost. Tree ANN Model Transp Geotech 27:100508

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirulli M, Pastor M (2012) Numerical study on the entrainment of bed material into rapid landslides. Geotechnique 11:959–972

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahmati O, Golkarian A, Biggs T, Keesstra S, Mohammadi F, Daliakopoulos N (2019) Land subsidence hazard modeling: machine learning to identify predictors and the role of human activities. J Environ Manage 236:466–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy P, Wulder A, Loveland R, Woodcock E, Allen G, Anderson C, Zhu Z (2014) Landsat-8: Science and product vision for terrestrial global change research. Remote Sens Environ 145:154–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena A, Jat MK, Clarke KC (2021) Development of SLEUTH-Density for the simulation of built-up land density. Comput Environ Urban Syst 1(86):101586

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer M, Thinh NX (2019) Evaluation of land cover change and agricultural protection sites: A GIS and remote sensing approach for Ho Chi Minh City. Vietnam Heliyon 5(5):e01773

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma D, Bisht DM (2017) Tuberculosis hypothetical proteins and proteins of unknown function: hope for exploring novel resistance mechanisms as well as future target of drug resistance. Front Microbiol 21(8):465

    Google Scholar 

  • Somvanshi SS, Bhalla O, Kunwar P, Singh M, Singh P (2020) Monitoring spatial LULC changes and its growth prediction based on statistical models and earth observation datasets of Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, India. Environ Dev Sustain 22:1073–1091

    Google Scholar 

  • Song XP, Hansen MC, Stehman SV, Potapov PV, Tyukavina A, Vermote EF, Townshend JR (2018) Global land change from 1982 to 2016. Nature 560(7720):639–643

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tafesse B, Suryabhagavan KV (2019) Systematic modeling of impacts of land-use and land-cover changes on land surface temperature in Adama Zuria District. Ethiopia Model Earth Syst and Environ 1(5):805–817

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi T, Das DK (2014) Debris flow: mechanics, prediction and countermeasures. CRC Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsagkatakis G, Aidini A, Fotiadou K, Giannopoulos M, Pentari A, Tsakalides P (2019) Survey of deep-learning approaches for remote sensing observation enhancement. Sensors 19:3929

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Westen CJ (2013) Remote sensing and GIS for natural hazards assessment and disaster risk management. Treat Geomorphol 3(15):259–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Wassie SB (2020) Natural resource degradation tendencies in Ethiopia: a review. Environ Syst Res 9:1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Weng SF, Reps J, Kai J, Garibaldi JM, Qureshi N (2017) Can machine-learning improve cardiovascular risk prediction using routine clinical data? PLoS ONE 12(4):e0174944

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolanin A, Mateo-García G, Camps-Valls G, Gómez-Chova L, Meroni M, Duveiller G, Liangzhi Y, Guanter L (2020) Estimating and understanding crop yields with explainable deep learning in the Indian Wheat Belt. Environ Res Lett 15(2):024019

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu W, Zucca C, Muhaimeed A, Al-Shafie W, Al-Quraishi AMF, Nangia V, Zhu M, Liu G (2018) Soil salinity prediction and mapping by machine learning regression in central Mesopotamia. Iraq Land Degrad Dev 29(11):4005–4014

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu S, Chen J, Zhou W, Iqbal J, Yao L (2019) A modified Logit model for assessment and validation of debris-flow susceptibility. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78:4421–4438

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang W, Wang Y, Sun S, Wang Y, Ma C (2019) Using sentinel-2 time series to detect slope movement before the Jinsha River landslide. Landslides 1(16):1313–1324

    Google Scholar 

  • Yesuph AY, Dagnew AB (2019) Land use/cover spatiotemporal dynamics, driving forces and implications at the Beshillo catchment of the blue nile basin, North Eastern Highlands of Ethiopia. Environmental Systems Research 8(1):1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang N, Matsushima T, Peng N (2019a) Numerical investigation of post-seismic debris flows in the epicentral area of the Wenchuan earthquake. Bull Eng Geol Env 1(78):3253–3268

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, van Westen CJ, Tanyas H, Mavrouli O, Ge Y, Bajrachary S, Gurung DR, Dhital MR, Khanal NR (2019b) How size and trigger matter: analyzing rainfall-and earthquake-triggered landslide inventories and their causal relation in the Koshi River basin, central Himalaya. Nat Hazard 19(8):1789–1805

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang T, Fu Q, Wang H, Liu F, Wang H, Han L (2022) Bagging-based machine learning algorithms for landslide susceptibility modeling. Nat Hazards 110(2):823–846

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao R, Chen Y, Shi P, Zhang L, Pan J, Zhao H (2013) Land use and land cover change and driving mechanism in the arid inland river basin: a case study of Tarim River, Xinjiang, China. Environ Earth Sci 68:591–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou S, Zhang Y, Tan X, Abbas SM (2021) A comparative study of the bivariate, multivariate and machine-learning-based statistical models for landslide susceptibility mapping in a seismic-prone region in China. Arab J Geosci 14:1–9

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to extend our appreciation to the Ethiopian Artificial Intelligence Institute and the Ethiopian Space Science and Geospatial Institute for their invaluable contribution in providing us with elevation data, satellite information, and historical land use maps.

Funding

This research received no specific grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The study's conception and design were contributed to by all of the authors. AB, AA, TD, and MA prepared the materials, collected data, and conducted the analyses. AB mainly prepared the first draft of the manuscript, and all authors provided feedback on work. The final manuscript was read and approved by all of the authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Amanuel Kumsa Bojer or Ayad M. Fadhil Al-Quraishi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bojer, A.K., Ahmed, M.E., Bekalo, D.J. et al. Analysis of land use/land cover change (LULCC) and debris flow risks in Adama district, Ethiopia, aided by numerical simulation and deep learning-based remote sensing. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 37, 4893–4910 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-023-02550-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-023-02550-w

Keywords

Navigation