Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Statistical inference for the binomial Ar(1) model with missing data

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, the binomial AR(1) model has been widely used in modeling time series of counts with finite range, such as rainfall prediction, process quality control, research of financial data, disease prevention and control, etc. However, in real-life applications, time series data often exhibit incompleteness missing samples, due to some sensor malfunctions or human errors, such as data input error, measurement error, experimental error or intentional abnormal value etc. In this article, we consider the statistical inference for the binomial AR(1) model with missing data. We first use the conditional least squares and conditional maximum likelihood methods with no imputation (NI) based on incomplete data. Then, we consider the imputation methods. We use the mean imputation, the bridge imputation, and the imputation based on likelihood, of which the last two methods are based on iterative schemes. The performance of the algorithm is shown in the simulation study. Finally, we illustrate our method by presenting a real-data example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alosh M (2009) The impact of missing data in a generalized integer-valued autoregression model for count data. J Biopharm Stat 19(6):1039–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson J, Karlis D (2010) Treating missing values in INAR(1) models: an application to syndromic surveillance data. J Time Ser Anal 31(1):12–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emura T, Lai CC, Sun LH (2021) Change point estimation under a copula-based Markov chain model for binomial time series. Econom Stat. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosta.2021.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand AE, Carlin BP (1993) Maximum-likelihood estimation for constrained- or missing-data models. Can J Stat 21(3):303–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang XW, Emura T (2022) Computational methods for a copula-based Markov chain model with a binomial time series. Commun Stat-Simul Comput. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2022.2061514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia B, Wang D, Zhang H (2014) A study for missing values in PINAR(1)\(_T\) processes. Commun Stat-Theory Methods 43(22):4780–4789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenward MG, Carpenter J (2007) Multiple imputation: current perspectives. Stat Methods Med Res 16(3):199–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe BP, Martin GM (2005) Bayesian predictions of low count time series. Int J Forecast 21(2):315–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie E (1985) Some simple models for discrete variate time series. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 21:645–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möller TA, Silva ME, Weiß CH, Scotto MG, Pereira I (2016) Self-exciting threshold binomial autoregressive processes. AStA Adv Stat Anal 100(4):369–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möller TA, Weiß CH, Kim HY, Sirchenko A (2018) Modeling zero inflation in count data time series with bounded support. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 20(2):589–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scotto MG, Weiß CH, Silva ME, Pereira I (2014) Bivariate binomial autoregressive models. J Multivar Anal 125:233–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steutel FW, van Harn K (1979) Discrete analogues of self-decomposability and stability. Ann Probab 7:893–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiß CH, Kim HY (2013) Parameter estimation for binomial AR (1) models with applications in finance and industry. Stat Pap 54:563–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Editor and two reviewers for their valuable suggestions and comments which greatly improved the article.

Funding

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.61901058) and the Jilin Provincial Science and Technology Department (No. 20210101078JC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Rui Zhang or Yong Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work, there is no professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service and/or company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in, or the review of, the manuscript entitled.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, R., Zhang, Y. Statistical inference for the binomial Ar(1) model with missing data. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 37, 4755–4763 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-023-02535-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-023-02535-9

Keywords

Navigation