Skip to main content
Log in

Non-parametric generation of multivariate cross-correlated random fields directly from sparse measurements using Bayesian compressive sensing and Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Simulation of multivariate cross-correlated random field samples (RFSs) is often required in reliability analysis of engineering structures. Conventional parametric methods for cross-correlated RFSs simulation generally require extensive measurements to obtain reliable random field parameters (e.g., type of auto-correlation function, correlation length, and cross-correlation matrix), for characterizing both the auto-correlation and cross-correlation structures among various cross-correlated engineering quantities. However, measurement data available in practice is often limited due to time, budget, technical and/or access constraints. Therefore, it is difficult to provide an accurate estimation of random field parameters (e.g., auto-correlation and cross-correlation matrix), rendering a challenging question of how to properly simulate multivariate cross-correlated RFSs from sparse measurements, especially when the number of engineering quantities of interest is large. This study aims to address this difficulty by developing a novel cross-correlated random field generator based on Bayesian compressive sensing (BCS) and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation. The proposed method is data-driven and non-parametric, and it directly uses sparse measurements as input and provides cross-correlated RFSs as output. More importantly, the proposed method is able to deal with a large number of cross-correlated quantities for big data analytics in a high-dimension domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20
Figure 21

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  • Aladejare A, Wang Y (2018) Influence of rock property correlation on reliability analysis of rock slope stability: from property characterization to reliability analysis. Geosci Front 9(6):1639–1648

    Google Scholar 

  • Alamanis N, Dakoulas P (2021) Simulation of random fields of soil properties by the local average subdivision method and engineering applications. Energy Syst 12:841–861

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang AH-S, Tang WH (2007) Probability concepts in engineering: emphasis on applications to civil and environmental engineering. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Anh V, Broadbridge P, Olenko A, Wang Y (2018) On approximation for fractional stochastic partial differential equations on the sphere. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 32:2585–2603

    Google Scholar 

  • Apanasovich T, Genton M (2010) Cross-covariance functions for multivariate random fields based on latent dimensions. Biometrika 97:15–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Arroyo D, Emery X (2017) Spectral simulation of vector random fields with stationary Gaussian increments in d-dimensional Euclidean spaces. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 31:1583–1592

    Google Scholar 

  • Au SK, WangY (2014) Engineering risk assessment with subset simulation. Wiley, Singapore, Pte. Ltd

  • Baecher G, Christian J (2003) Reliability and statistics in geotechnical engineering. Wiley, Chichester, pp 228–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxevani A, Lenzi A (2018) Very short-term spatio-temporal wind power prediction using a censored Gaussian field. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 32:931–948

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop CM (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Candès E, Wakin M (2008) An introduction to compressive sampling. IEEE Signal Process Mag 25(2):21–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Candès E, Romberg J, Tao T (2006) Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements. Commun Pure Appl Math 8:1207–1223

    Google Scholar 

  • Ching J, Wu S, Phoon K (2016) Statistical characterization of random field parameters using frequentist and Bayesian approaches. Can Geotech J 53(2):285–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho S (2010) Probabilistic assessment of slope stability that considers the spatial variability of soil properties. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136(7):975–984

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho S, Park H (2010) Effect of spatial variability of cross correlated soil properties on bearing capacity of strip footing. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 34(1):1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox D, Hinkley D (1974) Theoretical statistics. Springer, US, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai H, Zhang R, Beer M (2022) A new perspective on the simulation of cross-correlated random fields. Struct Saf 96:102201

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery X, Arroyo D, Porcu E (2016) An improved spectral turning-bands algorithm for simulating stationary vector Gaussian random fields. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 30:1863–1873

    Google Scholar 

  • Famili A, Shen W, Weber R, Simoudis E (1997) Data preprocessing and intelligent data analysis. Intell Data Anal 1(1–4):3–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenton G, Vanmarcke E (1990) Simulation of random fields via local average subdivision. J Eng Mech 116(8):1733–1749

    Google Scholar 

  • García S, Luengo J, Herrera F (2016) Tutorial on practical tips of the most influential data preprocessing algorithms in data mining. Knowledge-Based Syst 98:1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigoriu M (1993) On the spectral representation method in simulation. Probab Eng Mech 8(2):75–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan Z, Wang Y (2021) Non-parametric construction of site-specific non-Gaussian multivariate joint probability distribution from sparse measurements. Struct Saf 91:102077

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan Z, Wang Y, Zhao T (2022) Adaptive sampling strategy for characterizing spatial distribution of soil liquefaction potential using cone penetration test. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 14(4):1221–1231

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu Y, Zhao T, Wang Y, Choi C, Ng C (2019) Direct simulation of two-dimensional isotropic or anisotropic random field from sparse measurement using Bayesian compressive sampling. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 33:1477–1496

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaksa MB (1995) The influence of spatial variability on the geotechnical design properties of a stiff, overconsolidated clay. University of Adelaide

  • Ji S, Xue Y, Carin L (2008) Bayesian compressive sensing. IEEE Trans Signal Process 56(2008):2346–2356

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji S, Dunson D, Carin L (2009) Multitask compressive sensing. IEEE Trans Signal Process 57(1):92–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang S, Li D, Zhang L, Zhou C (2014) Slope reliability analysis considering spatially variable shear strength parameters using a non-intrusive stochastic finite element method. Eng Geol 168:120–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang S, Li D, Cao Z, Zhou C, Phoon K (2015) Efficient system reliability analysis of slope stability in spatially variable soils using Monte Carlo simulation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 141(2):04014096

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y, Hui Y, Wang Y, Peng L, Huang G, Liu S (2023) A novel eigenvalue-based iterative simulation method for multi-dimensional homogeneous non-Gaussian stochastic vector fields. Struct Saf 100:102290

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenzi A, Pinson P, Clemmensen L, Guillot G (2017) Spatial models for probabilistic prediction of wind power with application to annual-average and high temporal resolution data. Stochast Environ Res Risk Assess 31:1615–1631

    Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Wang Y (2021) Development of an efficient response surface method for highly nonlinear systems from sparse sampling data using Bayesian Compressive Sensing. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncertain Eng Syst A Civil Eng 7(4):04021050

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu L, Cheng Y, Zhang S (2017) Conditional random field reliability analysis of a cohesion-frictional slope. Comput Geotech 82:173–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloret-Cabot M, Fenton G, Hicks M (2014) On the estimation of scale of fluctuation in geostatistics. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 8 (2): 129–140

  • Machado M, Adhikari S, Santos J (2017) A spectral approach for damage quantification in stochastic dynamic systems. Mech Syst Signal Process 88:253–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheron G (1971) The theory of regionalized variables and its applications. Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris

  • Montoya-Noguera S, Zhao T, Hu Y, Wang Y, Phoon K (2019) Simulation of nonstationary non-Gaussian random fields from sparse measurements using Bayesian compressive sampling and Karhunen-Loève expansion. Struct Saf 79:66–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Paola M, Gullo I (2001) Digital generation of multivariate wind field processes. Probab Eng Mech 16:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Pati Y, Rezaiifar R, Krishnaprasad P (1993) Orthogonal matching pursuit: recursive function approximation with applications to wavelet decomposition. In: Proceedings of 27th Asilomar conference on signals systems and computers, Pacific Grove, Calif. IEEE, New York, pp. 40–44

  • Phoon K, Huang S, Quek S (2002) Implementation of Karhunen-Loève expansion for simulation using a wavelet-Galerkin scheme. Probab Eng Mech 17(3):293–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Phoon K, Huang H, Quek S (2005) Simulation of strongly non-Gaussian processes using Karhunen-Loève expansion. Probab Eng Mech 20(2):188–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro A, Junior P, Bonat W (2022) A Kronecker-based covariance specification for spatially continuous multivariate data. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 36:4087–4102

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin M, Gutjahr A, Sudicky E, Wilson J (1993) Cross-correlated random field generation with the direct Fourier transform method. Water Resour Res 29:2385–2397

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinozuka M, Deodatis G (1991) Simulation of stochastic processes by spectral representation. Appl Mech Revi 44(4):191–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivia DS, Skilling J (2006) Data analysis: a Bayesian tutorial. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith M, Eddins S (1990) Analysis/synthesis techniques for subband image coding. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process 38(8):1446–1456

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang X, Wang M, Li D (2020) Modeling multivariate cross-correlated geotechnical random fields using vine copulas for slope reliability analysis. Comput Geotech 127:103784

    Google Scholar 

  • Tipping M (2001) Sparse Bayesian learning and the relevance vector machine. J Mach Learn Res 1:211–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Torquato S (2013) Random heterogeneous materials: microstructure and macroscopic properties. Springer Science & Business Media, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tropp J, Gilbert A (2007) Signal recovery from random measurements via orthogonal matching pursuit. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 53(12):4655–4666

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzielli M, Vannucchi G, Phoon K (2005) Random field characterisation of stress-normalised cone penetration testing parameters. Geotechnique 55(1):3–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Vořechovský M (2008) Simulation of simply cross correlated random fields by series expansion methods. Struct Saf 30:337–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Li P (2021) Data-driven determination of sample number and efficient sampling locations for geotechnical site investigation of a cross-section using Voronoi diagram and Bayesian compressive sampling. Comput Geotech 130(2021):103898

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Zhao T (2016) Interpretation of soil property profile from limited measurement data: a compressive sampling perspective. Can Geotech J 53(9):1547–1559

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Zhao T (2017) Statistical interpretation of soil property profiles from sparse data using Bayesian compressive sampling. Géotechnique 67(6):523–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Akeju O, Zhao T (2017) Interpolation of spatially varying but sparsely measured geo-data: a comparative study. Eng Geol 231:200–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Zhao T, Phoon K (2018) Direct simulation of random field samples from sparsely measured geotechnical data with consideration of uncertainty in interpretation. Can Geotechnical Journal 55(6):862–880

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Tang X, Li D, Qi X (2020) Subset simulation for efficient slope reliability analysis involving copula-based cross-correlated random fields. Comput Geotech 118:103326

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Hu Y, Phoon K (2022) Non-parametric modelling and simulation of spatiotemporally varying geo-data. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 16 (1): 77–97

  • Webster R, Oliver M (2007) Geostatistics for environmental scientists. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu S, Law S (2012) Evaluating the response statistics of an uncertain bridge-vehicle system. Mech Syst Signal Process 27:576–589

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki F, Shinozuka M (1990) Simulation of stochastic fields by statistical preconditioning. J Eng Mech 116:268–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Li X, Qi X (2022) Efficient simulation of multivariate three-dimensional cross-correlated random fields conditioning on non-lattice measurement data. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 388:114208

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao T, Wang Y (2018) Interpretation of pile lateral response from deflection measurement data: a compressive sampling-based method. Soils Found 58(4):957–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao T, Wang Y (2018) Simulation of cross-correlated random field samples from sparse measurements using Bayesian compressive sensing. Mech Syst Signal Process 112:384–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao T, Wang Y (2020) Non-parametric simulation of non-stationary non-Gaussian 3D random field samples directly from sparse measurements using signal decomposition and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 203:107087

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu H, Zhang L, Xiao T, Li X (2017) Generation of multivariate cross-correlated geotechnical random fields. Comput Geotech 86:95–107

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work described in this paper was supported by a grant from the Research Grant Council of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (Project no. CityU 11203322), a grant from the Innovation and Technology Commission of Hong Kong Special Administrative region (Project no: MHP/099/21), and a grant from Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission (Shenzhen-Hong Kong-Macau Science and Technology Project (Category C) No: SGDX20210823104002020), China. The financial support is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Peiping Li and Yu Wang wrote the main manuscript text and developed all figures and tables. Zheng Guan contributed the implementation of treating cross-correlation as auto-correlation and data preprocessing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, P., Wang, Y. & Guan, Z. Non-parametric generation of multivariate cross-correlated random fields directly from sparse measurements using Bayesian compressive sensing and Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 37, 4607–4628 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-023-02523-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-023-02523-z

Keywords

Navigation