Skip to main content
Log in

Beyond stationary simulation; modern approaches to stochastic modelling

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stochastic and conditional simulation methods have been effective towards producing realistic realizations of spatial numerical models that share equal probability of occurrence. Application of these methods are valuable throughout the domain of earth science for their ability to simulate sampled study data. Such stochastic methods have also been adopted into other fields outside of geostatistics domains, especially within the computing and data science community. Classical techniques for stochastic simulation have primarily consisted of stationary methods due to their brisk simulation speed and mathematical simplicity. However, advances in modern computing now allow for the implementation of more advanced non-stationary simulation methods, consisting of multiple varying structures, and allowing for much more accurate and realistic simulations. As some of these calculations may still be slow, the application of machine learning techniques, namely the Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) can be used to surpass previous simulation generation speeds and allows for greater parameterization. This work presents three stochastic simulation methods: stochastic simulation using non-stationary covariance, multipoint simulation, and conditional GANs. A Stochastic Partial Differential Equation (SPDE) method was used as a benchmark comparison. Experiments using synthetic data are used to showcase the effectiveness of each of these methods at maintaining non-stationary structures and conditioned data. A case study implementing non-stationary covariances is also presented on real geochemical samples coming from La Ceinture de roches vertes de la Haute-Eastmain, located in the Superior Province.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boisvert JB, Deutsch CV (2011) Programs for kriging and sequential Gaussian simulation with locally varying anisotropy using non-Euclidean distances. Comput Geosci 37:495–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boucher A (2009) Considering complex training images with search tree partitioning. Comput Geosci 35:1151–1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan S, Elsheikh AH (2017) Parametrization and generation of geological models with generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.01810

  • Chiles JP (2012) The generalized variogram. FontaineBleau: mines ParisTech: center of geosciences and geoengineering/Geostatistics, France. Reference: R121030JCHI

  • Chiles JP, Delfiner P (2009) Geostatistics: modeling spatial uncertainty. Wiley, vol 497, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Coiffier G, Renard P, Lefebvre S (2020) 3d geological image synthesis from 2d examples using generative adversarial networks. Front Water 2:30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrakopoulos R, Yao L (2020) High-order spatial stochastic models. Springer International Publishing, Cham. pp 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26050-7_16-1

  • Dupont E, Zhang T, Tilke P, Liang L, Bailey W (2018) Generating realistic geology conditioned on physical measurements with generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.03065

  • Emery X, Arroyo D (2018) On a continuous spectral algorithm for simulating non-stationary gaussian random fields. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 32:905–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fouedjio F (2017) Second-order non-stationary modeling approaches for univariate geostatistical data. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 31:1887–1906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fouedjio F, Desassis N, Rivoirard J (2016) A generalized convolution model and estimation for non-stationary random functions. Spat Stat 16:35–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, Xu B, Warde-Farley D, Ozair S, Courville A, Bengio Y (2014) Generative adversarial nets. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 27

  • Guardiano FB, Srivastava RM (1993) Multivariate geostatistics: beyond bivariate moments. Geostatistics Troia’92. Springer, Berlin, pp 133–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Haji Abolhassani AA, Dimitrakopoulos R, Ferrie FP, Yao L (2022) A new non-stationary high-order spatial sequential simulation method. Math Geosci 54:1097–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higdon D, Swall J, Kern J (1999) Non-stationary spatial modeling. Bayesian statistics 6, In: Proceedings of the sixth valencia international meeting, pp 761–768

  • Journel AG (1974) Geostatistics for conditional simulation of ore bodies. Econ Geol 69:673–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laloy E, Hérault R, Jacques D, Linde N (2018) Training-image based geostatistical inversion using a spatial generative adversarial neural network. Water Resour Res 54:381–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren F, Rue H, Lindström J (2011) An explicit link between Gaussian fields and Gaussian Markov random fields: the stochastic partial differential equation approach. J Royal Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol) 73:423–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren F, Bolin D, Rue H (2022) The SPDE approach for gaussian and non-gaussian fields: 10 years and still running. Spatial Statistics 100599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2022.100599, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211675322000057

  • Mariethoz G, Renard P, Straubhaar J (2010) The direct sampling method to perform multiple-point geostatistical simulations. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariethoz G, Caers J (2014) Multiple-point geostatistics. Wiley, Hoboken. 10.1002/9781118662953

  • Mosser L, Dubrule O, Blunt MJ (2020) Stochastic seismic waveform inversion using generative adversarial networks as a geological prior. Math Geosci 52:53–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paciorek CJ, Schervish MJ (2003) Nonstationary covariance functions for gaussian process regression. In: NIPS, Citeseer. pp 273–280

  • Paciorek CJ, Schervish MJ (2006) Spatial modelling using a new class of nonstationary covariance functions. Environ Off J Int Environ Soc 17:483–506. https://doi.org/10.1002/env.785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puzyrev V, Salles T, Surma G, Elders C (2022) Geophysical model generation with generative adversarial networks. Geosci Lett 9:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen CE (2003) Gaussian processes in machine learning. Summer school on machine learning. Springer, Berlin, pp 63–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Risser MD (2016) Nonstationary spatial modeling, with emphasis on process convolution and covariate-driven approaches. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.02447

  • Shamsipour P, Marcotte D, Chouteau M, Rivest M, Bouchedda A (2013) 3D stochastic gravity inversion using nonstationary covariances. Geophysics 78:G15–G24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song S, Mukerji T, Hou J (2021) GANSim: conditional facies simulation using an improved progressive growing of generative adversarial networks (GANS). Math Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-021-09934-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strebelle S (2002) Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiple-point statistics. Math Geol 34:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahmasebi P (2018) Multiple point statistics: a review. Handbook of mathematical geosciences. Springer, Berlin, pp 613–643

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tahmasebi P, Hezarkhani A, Sahimi M (2012) Multiple-point geostatistical modeling based on the cross-correlation functions. Comput Geosci 16:779–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virtanen P, Gommers R, Oliphant TE, Haberland M, Reddy T, Cournapeau D, Burovski E, Peterson P, Weckesser W, Bright J, van der Walt SJ, Brett M, Wilson J, Millman KJ, Mayorov N, Nelson ARJ, Jones E, Kern R, Larson E, Carey CJ, Polat İ, Feng Y, Moore EW, VanderPlas J, Laxalde D, Perktold J, Cimrman R, Henriksen I, Quintero EA, Harris CR, Archibald AM, Ribeiro AH, Pedregosa F, van Mulbregt P (2020) SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in python. Nat Methods 17:261–272. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel H (2003) Multivariate geostatistics: an introduction with applications. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Zhang T, Boucher A (2007) Non-stationary multiple-point geostatistical simulations with region concept, In: Proceedings of the 20th SCRF meeting, Stanford, CA, USA, pp. 1–53

  • Yeh R, Chen C, Lim TY, Hasegawa-Johnson M, Do MN (2016) Semantic image inpainting with perceptual and contextual losses. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.07539 2

  • Yoon J, Jordon J, Schaar M (2018) Gain: missing data imputation using generative adversarial nets, In: International conference on machine learning, PMLR. pp 5689–5698

  • Zhang T (2006) Filter-based training pattern classification for spatial pattern simulation. Stanford University, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Xu T, Li H, Zhang S, Wang X, Huang X, Metaxas DN (2017) Stackgan: text to photo-realistic image synthesis with stacked generative adversarial networks, In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pp 5907–5915

  • Zhu JY, Park T, Isola P, Efros AA (2017) Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks, In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pp 2223–2232

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ludovic Bigot for providing the geochemical data which is used for our case study. We would also like to thank Grace Dupuis for her contribution to this work.

Funding

The Research funded by ALS GoldSpot Discoveries Ltd.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors share equal contribution towards this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tedd Kourkounakis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shamsipour, P., Kourkounakis, T., Meshkinnejad, R. et al. Beyond stationary simulation; modern approaches to stochastic modelling. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 37, 4129–4140 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-023-02497-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-023-02497-y

Keywords

Navigation