Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Heavy metal pollution and ecological risk under different land use types: based on the similarity of pollution sources and comparing the results of three evaluation models

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In key areas of ecological protection, it is significant to consider the similarity of pollution sources among heavy metals and the interaction between different sources, especially the ecological risk areas caused by heavy metal pollution. We collected 51 soil samples from five land use types with different soil depths in an industrial area on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Two and three major heavy metal combination types of Cd, Cu, Cr, Pb and Zn in different soil layers were identified using absolute principal component score-multiple linear regression models, and the potential pollution sources corresponding to the different types were quantified using Geo-Detector models. Factor-detector explanatory power of the land use type (q = 0.66) was much higher than that of the other factors of APCS1 in soil layer A, which was the most likely potential sources of Cd and Pb with high levels in urban land and irrigated land. Industrial activities, especially metallurgy and mining, are the most likely potential sources of Cd, Cu and Pb pollution. The downward migration of heavy metals in the study area was inferred from the similar trends of several indicators between soil layers A and B. The new model Nemerow Integrated Risk Index (NIRI) was used to analyse the integrated ecological risk across the study area and under different land use types by comparing with the pollution load index and Nemerow Integrated Pollution Index, and it was found that the risk level was lower in grassland and forest land than under other land use types, while it was higher in urban land and irrigated land. The contribution rate of Cd to NIRI values exceeded 80%, while the contribution rates of the 5 heavy metals to NIPI and PLI values are not significantly different, indicating that NIRI can highlight the impact of high cadmium toxicity factors on the overall risk level and is more accurate and flexible in identifying risk areas.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Basic datasets was provided by National Tibetan Plateau Data Center (http://data.tpdc.ac.cn) and the study datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

PLI:

Pollution Load Index

NIPI:

Nemerow Integrated Pollution Index

NIRI:

Nemerow Integrated Risk Index

APCS:

Absolute principal component scores

APCSn:

Absolute principal component scores type n

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to the data team from National Tibetan Plateau Data Center (http://data.tpdc.ac.cn) for providing us with solid experimental basic data. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42071254). The grantee is Prof. Jian Gong (Corresponding author).

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42071254). The grantee is Prof. Jian Gong (Corresponding author).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Conception and design of the study, Methodology, Writing—Original Draft, Writing—Review and Editing: HG; Conceptualization, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Final approval of the version to be submitted: JG; Software, Validation, Drafting the article, Writing—Review and Editing: JY; Investigation, Resources: GC; Data Curation, Software: TY.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Gong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Consent to publication

The Author confirms: that the work described has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis): that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. That its publication has been approved by all co-authors, if any. That its publication has been approved (tacitly or explicitly) by the responsible authorities at the institution where the work is carried out. The Author agrees to publication in the Journal indicated below and also to publication of the article in English by Springer in Springer's corresponding English-language journal. The copyright to the English-language article is transferred to Springer effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. The author warrants that his/her contribution is original and that he/she has full power to make this grant. The author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints. translations. photographic reproductions. microform. electronic form offline. online) or any other reproductions of similar nature. After submission of the agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order to the authors listed will not be accepted by Springer.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, H., Gong, J., Yang, J. et al. Heavy metal pollution and ecological risk under different land use types: based on the similarity of pollution sources and comparing the results of three evaluation models. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 37, 3893–3913 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-023-02486-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-023-02486-1

Keywords

Navigation