Skip to main content

Prediction of PM2.5 concentrations using soft computing techniques for the megacity Delhi, India

Abstract

Over the past few years, the concentration of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in Delhi’s atmosphere has progressively increased, resulting in smog episodes and affecting people’s health. Therefore, accurate and reliable forecasting of PM2.5 concentration is essential to guide effective precautions before and during extreme pollution events. In this work, soft computing techniques, including Artificial Neural Network and Gaussian Process Regression are employed to predict PM2.5 concentrations in Delhi. Four models, namely, multi-layer feed-forward neural network (MLFFNN), General regression neural network, Gaussian process regression with ARD squared exponential kernel (GPARD_sqexp) and Gaussian process regression with ARD rational quadratic kernel (GPARD_rat_quad) are built using meteorological and air quality data corresponding to a two-year period (2015–2016). The results of the study suggested that MLFFNN showed the best prediction performance among the four models, with testing correlation coefficient (R) 0.949, Root mean square error 30.193, Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency index 0.892 and Mean absolute error 18.388. Moreover, sensitivity analysis performed to understand the importance of different input variables reported that PM10, wind speed, air quality index and aerodynamic roughness coefficient (Z0) are the most critical parameters influencing MLFFNN model forecasts. On the whole, the work has demonstrated that the artificial neural network model is more capable of dealing with PM2.5 forecasting in Delhi urban area than the Gaussian process regression model.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

References

  • Agarwal S, Sharma S, Suresh R, Rahman MH, Vranckx S, Maiheu B, Batra S (2020) Air quality forecasting using artificial neural networks with real time dynamic error correction in highly polluted regions. Sci Total Environ 735:139454

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akhtar A, Masood S, Gupta C, Masood A (2018) Prediction and analysis of pollution levels in Delhi using multilayer perceptron. In: Data engineering and intelligent computing. Springer, Singapore, pp 563–572

  • Ashworth DC, Fuller GW, Toledano MB, Font A, Elliott P, Hansell AL, De Hoogh K (2016) Comparative assessment of particulate air pollution exposure from municipal solid waste incinerator emissions. In: Air quality. Apple Academic Press, pp 87–116

  • Bench G (2004) Measurement of contemporary and fossil carbon contents of PM2. 5 aerosols: Results from Turtleback Dome, Yosemite National Park. Environ Sci Technol 38(8):2424–2427

  • Chu W, Ghahramani Z, Williams CK (2005) Gaussian processes for ordinal regression. J Mach Learn Res 6(7):1

    Google Scholar 

  • CPCB (2009) National ambient air quality standards India. Central pollution control board. New Delhi, Government of India. Retrieved 25 December 2021

  • Dai C, Huang S, Peng H, Yi K, Zhou Y, Qin P (2019) Particulate pollution status and its characteristics during 2015–2016 in Hunan, China. Atmos Pollut Res 10(3):739–748

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport AG (1960) Rationale for determining design wind velocities. J Struct Div 86(5):39–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frohn LM, Christensen JH, Brandt J (2002) Development and testing of numerical methods for two-way nested air pollution modelling. Phys Chem Earth Parts a/b/c 27(35):1487–1494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gholizadeh A, Neshat AA, Conti GO, Ghaffari HR, Aval HE, Almodarresi SA, Miri M (2019) PM2.5 concentration modeling and mapping in the urban areas. Model Earth Syst Environ 5(3):897–906

  • Goodband JH, Haas OC, Mills JA (2008) A comparison of neural network approaches for on-line prediction in IGRT. Med Phys 35(3):1113–1122

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimmond CSB, Oke TR (1999) Aerodynamic properties of urban areas derived from analysis of surface form. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 38(9):1262–1292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo H, Sahu SK, Kota SH, Zhang H (2019) Characterization and health risks of criteria air pollutants in Delhi, 2017. Chemosphere 225:27–34

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang J, Shin S, Lee H, Moon IC (2020) Forecasting the concentration of particulate matter in the Seoul metropolitan area using a Gaussian process model. Sensors 20(14):3845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang GK, Gao JZ, Chiao S et al (2018) Air quality prediction: big data and machine learning approaches. Int J Environ Sci Develop 9(1):8–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar D, Tewary T (2021) Techno-economic assessment and optimization of a standalone residential hybrid energy system for sustainable energy utilization. Int J Energy Res 46(8):10020–10039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei MT, Monjardino J, Mendes L, Gonçalves D, Ferreira F (2019) Macao air quality forecast using statistical methods. Air Qual Atmos Health 12(9):1049–1057

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Hao X, Liao H, Hu J, Chen H (2021) Meteorological impact on winter PM2.5 pollution in Delhi: Present and future projection under a warming climate. Geophys Res Lett 48(13):e2021GL093722.

  • Maji KJ, Dikshit AK, Deshpande A (2017) Disability-adjusted life years and economic cost assessment of the health effects related to PM2.5 and PM10 pollution in Mumbai and Delhi, in India from 1991 to 2015. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(5):4709–4730

  • Masood A, Ahmad K (2020) A model for particulate matter (PM2. 5) prediction for Delhi based on machine learning approaches. Procedia Comput Sci 167:2101–2110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masood A, Ahmad K (2021) A review on emerging artificial intelligence (AI) techniques for air pollution forecasting: Fundamentals, application and performance. J Clean Prod 322:129072

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masood A, Kafeel A, Shamshad A (2017) Urban roadside monitoring, modeling and mapping of air pollution. Appl J Environ Eng Sci 3(2):3–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez P, Menares C (2018) Forecasting of hourly PM2.5 in south-west zone in Santiago de Chile. Aerosol Air Qual Res 18(10):2666–2679

  • Ramachandran S (2007) Aerosol optical depth and fine mode fraction variations deduced from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) over four urban areas in India. J Geophys Res: Atmos 112(D16):1

  • Slade DH (1969) Wind measurement on a tall tower in rough and inhomogeneous terrain. J Appl Meteorol 8(2):293–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava C, Singh S, Singh AP (2018) Estimation of air pollution in Delhi using machine learning techniques. In: 2018 International Conference on Computing, Power and Communication Technologies (GUCON). IEEE, pp 304–309

  • Suleiman A, Tight MR, Quinn AD (2019) Applying machine learning methods in managing urban concentrations of traffic-related particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5). Atmos Pollut Res 10(1):134–144

  • Sun W, Sun J (2017) Daily PM2. 5 concentration prediction based on principal component analysis and LSSVM optimized by cuckoo search algorithm. J Environ Manag 188:144–152

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor KE (2001) Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram. J Geophys Res: Atmos 106(D7):7183–7192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verkaik JW (2000) Evaluation of two gustiness models for exposure correction calculations. J Appl Meteorol 39(9):1613–1626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Zhang F, Peng J, Duan L, Ji Y, Marrero-Ortiz W, Zhang R (2018) Particle acidity and sulfate production during severe haze events in China cannot be reliably inferred by assuming a mixture of inorganic salts. Atmos Chem Phys 18(14):10123–10132

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Wang B (2019) Research on prediction of environmental aerosol and PM2.5 based on artificial neural network. Neural Comput Appl 31(12):8217–8227

  • Weber RO (1999) Remarks on the definition and estimation of friction velocity. Bound-Layer Meteorol 93(2):197–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieringa J (1992) Updating the Davenport roughness classification. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 41(1–3):357–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to Indian Meteorological department (IMD) and Delhi pollution control committee (DPCC) for providing the meteorological and air quality data for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.M.: Project administration, Conceptualization, Writing- original draft, Software, Formal analysis, Visualization. A.M. and K.A.: Formal analysis; Writing- original draft, Visualization. A.M. and K.A.: Data curation, Writing, Review and editing. K.A.: Supervision, Writing, Review, Editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adil Masood.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This manuscript has not been published or presented elsewhere in part or in entirety and is not under consideration by another journal. There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Masood, A., Ahmad, K. Prediction of PM2.5 concentrations using soft computing techniques for the megacity Delhi, India. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-022-02291-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-022-02291-2

Keywords

  • PM2.5
  • Roughness coefficient
  • GRNN
  • MLFFNN