Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Deep learning algorithms to develop Flood susceptibility map in Data-Scarce and Ungauged River Basin in India

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 12 May 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Flood is considered the most extensive natural disaster around the globe. Kunur River, a riverine landscape of Rarh Bengal, was selected as the study area because this basin has undergone several floods. This research work applied deep learning and benchmark machine learning methods for preparing the flood susceptibility maps (FSMs) at a basin scale. For this work, sixteen flood controlling factors were applied. These predisposing factors were chosen based on field knowledge, previous researchs, and data availability. The FSMs were produced for the better palling and management of natural resources of Kunur River Basin, applying one deep learning model (DLM) includes convolution neural network (CNN) model and three benchmark machine learning methods (BMLMs) including multilayer perceptron (MLP), Bagging, and random forest (RF). The differences in prediction capacity between the models were assessed by applying the Friedman rank test and Wilcoxon test. Performance of the FSMs, evaluated through the precision, accuracy, AUC (area under the curve), and statistical measures revealed that CNN has the highest AUC values (0.934) followed by MLP (0.927), Bagging (0.897), and RF (0.900) respectively. The CNN model’s prediction capacity is slightly better than Bagging, RF, and MLP models. Finally, we can conclude that the deep learning model is more robust than the benchmark MLMs (RF, MLP and Bagging) and CNN is excellent alternative for FSMs considering the used variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  • Abedinpour M, Sarangi A, Rajput TBS, Singh M, Pathak H, Ahmad T (2012) Performance evaluation of AquaCrop model for maize crop in a semi-arid environment. Agric Water Manag 110:55–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Adnan MSG, Talchabhadel R, Nakagawa H, Hall JW (2020) The potential of Tidal River Management for flood alleviation in South Western Bangladesh. Sci. Total Environ., 731, p.138747

  • Alfieri L, Bisselink B, Dottori F, Naumann G, de Roo A, Salamon P, Wyser K, Feyen L (2017) Global projections of river flood risk in a warmer world. EARTHS FUTURE 5(2):171–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali SA, Parvin F, Pham QB, Vojtek M, Vojtekova J, Costache R, Linh NTT, Nguyen HQ, Ahmad A, Ghorbani MA (2020) GIS-based comparative assessment of flood susceptibility mapping using hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach, naïve Bayes tree, bivariate statistics and logistic regression: A case of Topľa basin, Slovakia. Ecol. Indic., 117, p.106620

  • Anantrasirichai N, Biggs J, Albino F, Hill P, Bull D (2018) Application of machine learning to classification of volcanic deformation in routinely generated InSAR data. J Geophys Research: Solid Earth 123(8):6592–6606

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arabameri, A, Rezaei, K, Cerdà, A, Conoscenti, C (2019) Kalantari, Z. A comparison of statistical methods and multi-criteria decision making to map flood hazard susceptibility in Northern Iran. Sci Total Environ, 660:443–458

  • Arabameri A, Saha S, Chen W, Roy J, Pradhan B, Bui DT (2020) Flash flood susceptibility modelling using functional tree and hybrid ensemble techniques. J Hydrol 587, 125007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125007

  • Benediktsson, J A, Swain, P H, Ersoy, O K, Hong, D (1990) Classification of very high dimensional data using neural networks. In: 10th Annual International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium-IGARSS'90

  • Beven KJ, Kirkby MJ (1979) A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology/Un modèle à base physique de zone d’appel variable de l’hydrologie du bassin versant. Hydrol Sci J 24(1):43–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickel VT, Lanaras C, Manconi A, Loew S, Mall U (2018) Automated detection of lunar rockfalls using a Faster Region-based Convolutional Neural Network. In AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts (Vol. 2018, pp. P41D-3761)

  • Binh PT, Zhu X, Groeneveld RA, van Ierland EC (2020) Risk communication, women’s participation and flood mitigation in Vietnam: An experimental study. La. U. Pol., p 104436

  • Breiman L (1996) Bagging predictors. Mach Learn 24:123–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00058655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui DT, Tuan TA, Klempe H, Pradhan B, Revhaug I (2016) Spatial prediction models for shallow landslide hazards: a comparative assessment of the efficacy of support vector machines, artificial neural networks, kernel logistic regression, and logistic model tree. Lands 13(2):361–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Bui, DT, Hoang, ND, Martínez-Álvarez, F, Ngo, PTT, Hoa, PV, Pham, TD, Samui, P, Costache, R (2020) A novel deep learning neural network approach for predicting flash flood susceptibility: A case study at a high frequency tropical storm area. Sci Total Environ, 701:134413.

  • Can T, Nefeslioglu HA, Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H, Duman TY (2005) Susceptibility assessment of shallow earthflows triggered by heavy rainfall at three sub catchments by logistic regres-sion analyses. Geomorp 72(1–4):250–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapi K, Singh VP, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Bui DT, Pham BT, Khosravi K (2017) A novel hybrid artificial intelligence approach for flood susceptibility assessment. Environ Model Softw 95:229–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Li Q, Wang H, Deng M (2020a) A machine learning ensemble approach based on random forest and radial basis function neural network for risk evaluation of regional flood disaster: a case study of the Yangtze River Delta, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(1):49

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Chen X, Peng J, Panahi M, Lee S (2021) Landslide susceptibility modeling based on ANFIS with teaching-learning-based optimization and Satin bowerbird optimizer. Geosci Front 12(1):93–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Hong H, Li S, Shahabi H, Wang Y, Wang X, Ahmad BB (2019) Flood susceptibility modelling using novel hybrid approach of reduced-error pruning trees with random subspace and random subspace ensembles. J Hydrol 575:864–873

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Li Y, Xue W, Shahabi H, Li S, Hong H, Wang X, Bian H, Zhang S, Pradhan B, Ahmad BB (2020b) Modeling flood susceptibility using data-driven approaches of naïve bayes tree, alternating decision tree, and random forest methods. Sci. Total Environ., 701, p.134979

  • Chen W, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Ahmad BB, Zhang S, Hong H, Zhang N (2017) A novel hybrid artificial intelligence approach based on the rotation forest ensemble and naïve Bayes tree classifiers for a landslide susceptibility assessment in Langao County, China. Geomatics, Nat. Hazards Risk, 8(2), pp.1955–1977

  • Chen W, Peng J, Hong H, Shahabi H, Pradhan B, Liu J, Zhu AX, Pei X, Duan Z (2018) Landslide susceptibility modelling using gis-based machine learning techniques for chongren county. In: Science of the Total Environment, Jiangxi province, China. pp 626:230

  • Choubin B, Moradi E, Golshan M, Adamowski J, Sajedi-Hosseini F, Mosavi A (2019) An ensemble prediction of flood susceptibility using multivariate discriminant analysis, classification and regression trees, and support vector machines. Sci Total Environ 651:2087–2096

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cloke HL, Pappenberger F (2009) Ensemble flood forecasting: A review. J Hydrol 375(3–4):613–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Costache R (2019) Flash-Flood Potential assessment in the upper and middle sector of Prahova river catchment (Romania). A comparative approach between four hybrid models. Sci Total Environ 659:1115–1134

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dahri N, Abida H (2017) Monte Carlo simulation-aided analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for flood susceptibility mapping in Gabes Basin (southeastern Tunisia). Environ Earth Sci 76(7):302

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodangeh E, Choubin B, Eigdir AN, Nabipour N, Panahi M, Shamshirband S, Mosavi A (2020) Integrated machine learning methods with resampling algorithms for flood susceptibility prediction. Sci Total Environ 705:135983

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El-Haddad BA, Youssef AM, Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, El-Shater AH, El-Khashab MH (2021) Flood susceptibility prediction using four machine learning techniques and comparison of their performance at Wadi Qena Basin. Egypt Nat Hazards 105(1):83–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Falah F, Rahmati O, Rostami M, Ahmadisharaf E, Daliakopoulos IN, Pourghasemi HR (2019) Artificial neural networks for flood susceptibility mapping in data-scarce urban areas. In: Pourghasemi, HR., Gokceoglu, C., Elsevier (eds.)Spatial modeling in GIS and R for Earth and Environmental Sciences. pp 323–336

  • Fang Z, Wang Y, Peng L, Hong H (2020) Predicting flood susceptibility using LSTM neural networks. J Hydrol. 594:125734

  • García-Ruiz JM, Regüés D, Alvera B, Lana-Renault N, Serrano-Muela P, Nadal-Romero E, Navas A, Latron J, Martí-Bono C, Arnáez J (2008) Flood generation and sediment transport in experimental catchments affected by land use changes in the central Pyrenees. J Hydrol 356(1–2):245–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner M, Dorling S (1998) Artificial neural networks (the multilayer perceptron)—a review of applications in the atmospheric sciences. Atmos Environ 32(97):2627–2636. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gayen A, Pourghasemi HR, Saha S, Keesstra S, Bai S (2019) Gully erosion susceptibility assessment and management of hazard-prone areas in India using different machine learning algorithms. Sci Total Environ 668:124–138

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Girshick R, Donahue J, Darrell T, Malik J (2014) Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 580–587

  • Girshick, R (2015) Fast r-cnn. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision pp 1440–1448

  • Ghorbanzadeh O, Blaschke T, Gholamnia K, Meena SR, Tiede D, Aryal J (2019) Evaluation of different machine learning methods and deep-learning convolutional neural networks for landslide detection. Remote Sens 11(2):196

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodfellow, I, Bengio, Y, Courville, A (2016) Deep learning. MIT press. pp 29–710

  • Haykin S, Haykin SS, Haykin SS, Haykin SS (2009) Neural networks and learning machines. vol. 3 Pearson. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA

  • He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 770–778

  • Hong, H A, Jaafari, EK Zenner (2019) Predicting spatial patterns of wildfire susceptibility in the Huichang County, China: An integrated model to analysis of landscape indicators. Ecological Indicators 101:878–891.

  • Kalantari Z, Ferreira CSS, Walsh RPD, Ferreira AJD, Destouni G (2017) Urbanization development under climate change: hydrological responses in a periurban Mediterranean catchment. Land Degrad. Dev. 28 (7), 2207–2221. https://doi

  • Kanani-Sadat Y, Arabsheibani R, Karimipour F, Nasseri M (2019) A new approach to flood susceptibility assessment in data-scarce and ungauged regions based on GIS-based hybrid multi criteria decision-making method. J Hydrol 572:17–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Khosravi K, Nohani E, Maroufinia E, Pourghasemi HR (2016) A GIS-based flood susceptibility assessment and its mapping in Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence bivariate statistical models with multi-criteria decision-making technique. Nat Hazards 83(2):947–987

    Google Scholar 

  • Khosravi K, Shahabi H, Pham BT, Adamowski J, Shirzadi A, Pradhan B, Dou J, Ly HB, Gróf G, Ho HL, Hong H (2019) A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modeling using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis and Machine Learning Methods. J Hydrol 573:311–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Kia MB, Pirasteh S, Pradhan B, Mahmud AR, Sulaiman WNA, Moradi A (2012) An artificial neural network model for flood simulation using GIS: Johor River Basin, Malaysia. Environ Earth Sci 67(1):251–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, MK, Kang, H, Baek, CW, Jung, YH, Woo, YC, Choi, GJ, Shin, HY, Kim, KS (2018) Antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects of ginsenoside Rf in a rat model of incisional pain. J Ginseng Res, 42(2):183–191

  • Kiss, R (2004) Determination of drainage network in digital elevation model, utilities and limitations. J Hung Geo-Math, 2:16–29

  • Krizhevsky, A., I. Sutskever, G.E. Hinton. 2013. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: F. Pereira, C.J.C. Burges, L. Bottou, and K.Q. Weinberger (eds) Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), Vol. 2, 3–6 December 2012, Lake Tahoe, Nevada, USA, pp 1097–1105

  • Koppula, S, Orosa, L, Yağlıkçı, A G, Azizi, R, Shahroodi, T, Kanellopoulos, K, Mutlu, O (2019, October) EDEN: Enabling energy-efficient, high-performance deep neural network inference using approximate DRAM. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture, pp 166–181

  • Kuriqi A, Koçileri G, Ardiçlioğlu M (2020) Potential of Meyer-Peter and Müller approach for estimation of bed-load sediment transport under different hydraulic regimes. Model Earth Syst Environ 6(1):129–137

    Google Scholar 

  • LeCun, Y, Bengio, Y, Hinton, G (2015) Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553):436–444

  • Lee S, Kim JC, Jung HS, Lee MJ, Lee S (2017) Spatial prediction of flood susceptibility using random-forest and boosted-tree models in Seoul metropolitan city, Korea. Geomatics, Nat Hazards Risk, 8(2):1185–1203

  • Lei X, Chen W, Avand M, Janizadeh S, Kariminejad N, Shahabi H, Mosavi A (2020) GIS-based machine learning algorithms for gully erosion susceptibility mapping in a semi-arid region of Iran. Remote Sens 12(15):2478

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Shen H, Feng R, Li J, Zhang L (2017) DEM generation from contours and a low-resolution DEM. ISPRS J Photogrammetry Remote Sens 134:135–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Li A, Zhang XJ, Liu B (2021) Effects of DEM resolutions on soil erosion prediction using Chinese Soil Loss Equation. Geomorphology 384:107706

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandal S, Mandal K (2017) Bivariate statistical index for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Rorachu river basin of eastern Sikkim Himalaya, India. Spat Inf Res 26(1):59–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavhura E, Manyena B, Collins AE (2017) An approach for measuring social vulnerability in context: The case of flood hazards in Muzarabani district. Zimbabwe Geoforum 86:103–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield HJ, Smith C, Gallagher M, Hockings M (2020) Considerations for selecting a machine learning technique for predicting deforestation. Environ Model Softw 131:104741

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra K, Sinha R (2020) Flood risk assessment in the Kosi megafan using multi-criteria decision analysis: A hydro-geomorphic approach. Geomorp 350:106861

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghaddam DD, Pourghasemi HR, Rahmati O (2019) Assessment of the Contribution of Geo-environmental Factors to Flood Inundation in a Semi-arid Region of SW Iran: Comparison of Different Advanced Modeling Approaches. In: Pourghasemi HR, and Rossi M., (eds.) Natural Hazards GIS-Based Spatial Modeling Using Data Mining Techniques. Springer, Cham, pp 59–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty MP, Vittal H, Yadav V, Ghosh S, Rao GS, Karmakar S (2020) A new bivariate risk classifier for flood management considering hazard and socio-economic dimensions. J. Environ. Manage., 255, p.109733

  • Moore, ID, Grayson, RB, Ladson, AR (1991) Digital terrain modelling: A review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrol Process, 5:3–30

  • Mukhopadhyay S (2010) A geo-environmental assessment of flood dynamics in lower Ajoy River inducing sand splay problem in Eastern India. Ethiopian J. Environ. Stud. Manage. 3(2)

  • Nachappa TG, Piralilou ST, Gholamnia K, Ghorbanzadeh O, Rahmati O, Blaschke T (2020) Flood susceptibility mapping with machine learning, multi-criteria decision analysis and ensemble using Dempster Shafer Theory. J Hydrol, p 125275

  • Naghibi, S A, Ahmadi, K, Daneshi, A (2017) Application of support vector machine, random forest, and genetic algorithm optimized random forest models in groundwater potential mapping. Water Resour Manag, 31(9):2761–2775

  • Pal S, Mandal I (2021) Noise vulnerability of stone mining and crushing in Dwarka river basin of Eastern India.Environ. Dev. Sustain., 1–22

  • Pal S, Paul S (2020) Assessing wetland habitat vulnerability in moribund Ganges delta using bivariate models and machine learning algorithms. Ecol Indic 119:106866

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul GC, Saha S, Hembram TK (2019) Application of the GIS-Based Probabilistic Models for Mapping the Flood Susceptibility in Bansloi Sub-basin of GangaBhagirathi River and Their Comparison. Remote Sens Earth Syst Sci 2(2–3):120–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41976-019-00018-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pham BT, Bui DT, Prakash I, Dholakia MB (2016) Rotation forest fuzzy rule-based classifier ensemble for spatial prediction of landslides using GIS. Nat Hazards 83(1):97–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Pham BT, Luu C, Van Phong T, Trinh PT, Shirzadi A, Renoud S, Asadi S, Van Le H, von Meding J, Clague JJ (2020b) Can deep learning algorithms outperform benchmark machine learning algorithms in flood susceptibility modeling?. J Hydrol p.125615

  • Pham BT, Phong TV, Nguyen HD, Qi C, Al-Ansari N, Amini A, Ho LS, Tuyen TT, Yen HPH, Ly HB, Prakash I (2020a) A Comparative Study of Kernel Logistic Regression, Radial Basis Function Classifier, Multinomial Naïve Bayes, and Logistic Model Tree for Flash Flood Susceptibility Mapping. Water, 12(1), p.239

  • Philips RC, Samadi S, Meadows ME (2018) How extreme was the October 2015 flood in the Carolinas? An assessment of flood frequency analysis and distribution tails. J Hydrol 562:648–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.05.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Gayen A, Edalat M, Zarafshar M, Tiefenbacher JP (2020) Is multi-hazard mapping effective in assessing natural hazards and integrated watershed management? Geosci Front 11(4):1203–1217

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Jirandeh AG, Pradhan B, Xu C, Gokceoglu C (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machine and GIS at the Golestan Province, Iran. Earth Syst Sci 122(2):349–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B (2010) Flood susceptible mapping and risk area delineation using logistic regression, GIS and remote sensing. J Spat Hydrol 9(2):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakash N, Manconi A, Loew S (2020) Mapping landslides on EO data: Performance of deep learning models vs. traditional machine learning models. Remote Sens 12(3):346

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahmati O, Pourghasemi HR, Zeinivand H (2016) Flood susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence models in the Golastan Province. Iran Geocarto Int 31(1):42–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahmati O, Tahmasebipour N, Haghizadeh A, Pourghasemi HR, Feizizadeh B (2017) Evaluating the influence of geo-environmental factors on gully erosion in a semi-arid region of Iran: an integrated framework. Sci Total Environ 579:913–927

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rasyid AR, Bhandary NP, Yatabe R (2016) Performance of frequency ratio and logistic regression model in creating GIS based landslides susceptibility map at Lompobattang Mountain, Indonesia. Geoenviron Disasters 3(1):19

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy S, Mistri B (2016) Flooding in the Confluence Zone of the Ajay and the Kunur Rivers, West Bengal: A Hydrogeomorphological Assessment, Journal of Indian Geomorp., Volume 4, 2016 ISSN 2320-0731pp 73–84

  • Saha S, Paul GC, Pradhan B, Maulud A, Alamri AM (2021a) Integrating multilayer perceptron neural nets with hybrid ensemble classifiers for deforestation probability assessment in Eastern India. Geomatics, Nat. Hazards Risk, 12(1), pp.29–62

  • Samanta S, Pal DK, Palsamanta B (2018) Flood susceptibility analysis through remote sensing, GIS and frequency ratio model. Appl Water Sci 8(2):66

    Google Scholar 

  • Sameen MI, Pradhan B, Lee S (2020) Application of convolutional neural networks featuring Bayesian optimization for landslide susceptibility assessment. CATENA 186:104249

    Google Scholar 

  • Şen Z (2018) Flood modeling, prediction and mitigation. Springer International Publishing. Springer/978-3-319-52355-2

  • Schmidhuber J (2015) Deep learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural Networks 6185-117 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003

  • Shahabi H, Shirzadi A, Ghaderi K, Omidvar E, Al-Ansari N, Clague JJ, Geertsema M, Khosravi K, Amini A, Bahrami S, Rahmati O (2020) Flood detection and susceptibility mapping using sentinel-1 remote sensing data and a machine learning approach: Hybrid intelligence of bagging ensemble based on k-nearest neighbor classifier. Remote Sens.,12(2), p.266

  • Shirzadi A, Solaimani K, Roshan MH, Kavian A, Chapi K, Shahabi H, Bui DT (2019) Uncertainties of prediction accuracy in shallow landslide modeling: Sample size and raster resolution. CATENA 178:172–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Singha P, Das P, Talukdar S, Pal S (2020) Modeling livelihood vulnerability in erosion and flooding induced river island in Ganges riparian corridor, India. Ecol Indic 119:106825

    Google Scholar 

  • Souissi D, Zouhri L, Hammami S, Msaddek MH, Zghibi A, Dlala M (2020) GIS-based MCDM–AHP modeling for flood susceptibility mapping of arid areas, southeastern Tunisia. Geocarto Int 35(9):991–1017

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain KC, Singha C, Nayak L (2020) Flood Susceptibility Mapping through the GIS-AHP Technique Using the Cloud. ISPRS int. j. geo-inf 9(12):720

    Google Scholar 

  • Szwagrzyk M, Kaim D, Price B, Wypych A, Grabska E, Kozak J (2018) Impact of forecasted land use changes on flood risk in the Polish Carpathians. Nat Haz 94(1):227–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Talukdar S, Pal S (2020) Wetland habitat vulnerability of lower Punarbhaba river basin of the uplifted Barind region of Indo-Bangladesh. Geocarto Int 35(8):857–886

    Google Scholar 

  • Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Jebur MN (2014) Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS. J Hydrol 512:332–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Jebur MN (2015) Flood susceptibility analysis and its verification using a novel ensemble support vector machine and frequency ratio method. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 29(4):1149–1165

    Google Scholar 

  • Tien Bui D, Tuan TA, Klempe H, Pradhan B, Revhaug I (2016) Spatial prediction models for shallow landslide hazards: a comparative assessment of the efficacy of support vector machines, artificial neural networks, kernel logistic regression, and logistic model tree. Lands 13(2):361–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Tien Bui D, Hoang ND, Martínez-Álvarez F, Ngo PTT, Hoa PV, Pham TD, Samui P, Costache R (2020) A novel deep learning neural network approach for predicting flash flood susceptibility: A case study at a high frequency tropical storm area. Sci. Total Environ., 701, p.134413

  • Tien Bui D, Khosravi K, Li S, Shahabi H, Panahi M, Singh VP, Chapi K, Shirzadi A, Panahi S, Chen W, Ahmad B (2018) B. New hybrids of anfis with several optimization algorithms for flood susceptibility modeling. Water, 10(9), p.1210

  • Tien Bui D, Ngo PTT, Pham TD, Jaafari A, Minh NQ, Hoa PV, Samui P (2019) A novel hybrid approach based on a swarm intelligence optimized extreme learning machine for flash flood susceptibility mapping, vol 179. Catena, pp 184–196

  • Tien Bui D, Tuan TA, Klempe H, Pradhan B, Revhaug I (2015) Spatial prediction models for shallow landslide hazards: a comparative assessment of the efficacy of support vectormachines, artificial neural networks, kernel logistic regression, and logistic model tree. Lands. 1–18.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0557-6

  • Vafakhah M, Loor SMH, Pourghasemi H, Katebikord A (2020) Comparing performance of random forest and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system data mining models for flood susceptibility mapping. Arab J Geosci 13:417

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dao D, Jaafari A, Bayat M, Mafi-Gholami D, Qi C, Moayedi H, Van Phong T, Ly HB, Le TT, Trinh PT, Luu C (2020) A spatially explicit deep learning neural network model for the prediction of landslide susceptibility. Catena, 188, p.104451

  • Vázquez-Romero, A, Gallardo-Antolín, A (2020) Automatic detection of depression in speech using ensemble convolutional neural networks. Entropy, 22(6):688

  • Wang HB, Wu SR, Shi JS, Li B (2013) Qualitative hazard and risk assessment of landslides: a practical framework for a case study in China. Nat hazards 69(3):1281–1294

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Hong H, Chen W, Li S, Pamučar D, Gigović L, Drobnjak S, Tien Bui D, Duan H (2019) A hybrid GIS multi-criteria decision-making method for flood susceptibility mapping at Shangyou, China. Remote Sens., 11(1), p.62

  • Weiss A (2001) Topographic position and landforms analysis. Poster Presentation, ESRI User Conference, San Diego, CA

  • Witten IH, Frank E, Mark AH (2011) Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques, 3rd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu HL, Cheng WC, Shen SL, Lin MY, Arulrajah A (2020) Variation of hydro-environment during past four decades with underground sponge city planning to control flash floods in Wuhan, China: An overview. Underg Space 5(2):184–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Q, Zhao Z, Liu L, Granger DE, Wang H, Cohen DJ, Wu X, Ye M, Bar-Yosef O, Lu B, Zhang J (2016) Outburst flood at 1920 BCE supports historicity of China’s Great Flood and the Xia dynasty. Sci 353(6299):579–582

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yalcin A (2008) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): comparisons of results and confirmations. Catena 72:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Yariyan P, Janizadeh S, Van Phong T, Nguyen HD, Costache R, Van Le H, Pham BT, Pradhan B, Tiefenbacher JP (2020) Improvement of best first decision trees using bagging and dagging ensembles for flood probability mapping. Water Resour Manag 34(9):3037–3053

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao G, Pang B, Xu Z, Peng D, Xu L (2019) Assessment of urban flood susceptibility using semi-supervised machine learning model. Sci Total Environ 659:940–949

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu XX, Tuia D, Mou L, Xia GS, Zhang L, Xu F, Fraundorfer F (2017) Deep learning in remote sensing: A comprehensive review and list of resources. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine 5(4):8–36

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thanks the inhabitants of Basin because they have helped a lot during our field visit. At last, authors would like to acknowledge all of the agencies and individuals specially, Survey of India (SOI), Geological Survey of India (GSI) and USGS for providing the maps and data required for the study.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, University of Gour Bnaga, Malda, West Bengal, India

    Sunil Saha

  2. Department of Geography, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

    Amiya Gayen

  3. Department of Geography, Netaji Subhas Open University, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

    Bijoy Bayen

Authors
  1. Sunil Saha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amiya Gayen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bijoy Bayen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Sunil Saha: Methodology, Format analysis, writing original draft preparation, writing review and editing; Amiya Gayen: Methodology, Format analysis, writing original draft preparation, Software; Writing review and editing; Bijoy Bayen: Methodology, Format analysis, Investigation, Writing original draft preparation, Software;

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunil Saha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saha, S., Gayen, A. & Bayen, B. Deep learning algorithms to develop Flood susceptibility map in Data-Scarce and Ungauged River Basin in India. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 36, 3295–3310 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-022-02195-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-022-02195-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation