Abstract
Flooding in coastal river reaches is the result of complex interactions between coastal and inland drivers. Flood hazard assessments need to consider how these drivers interact in space and time, for which a standard method is currently lacking. A complex hydrodynamic model is required to reproduce the physics of the combined forcings and, at the same time, to fully explore the combinations of drivers that can occur in order to determine extreme flood frequencies. In this work, we explore the individual role of astronomical tide, storm surge and river discharge and their correlations in the extreme flood levels of a coastal river reach. We apply a computationally efficient surrogate model of a 2D shallow water model based on least squares support vector machines regression to reconstruct 10,000 years-long time series of water levels in the reach. As input to the model, we consider an ensemble of synthetic time series of the flood drivers, which differ in the number of variables considered and in their correlations. Probabilities of exceedance of water levels are then computed and compared. The proposed methodology can give a better understanding of the flooding processes in a multivariable environment, as low-lying coastal urban areas typically are, and can provide guidance on where to focus modelling efforts when developing flood hazard assessments in such areas.








Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bermúdez M, Zischg AP (2018) Sensitivity of flood loss estimates to building representation and flow depth attribution methods in micro-scale flood modelling. Nat Hazards 92:1633–1648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3270-7
Bermúdez M, Ntegeka V, Wolfs V, Willems P (2018) Development and comparison of two fast surrogate models for urban pluvial flood simulations. Water Resour Manag 32:2801–2815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-1959-8
Bermúdez M, Cea L, Puertas J (2019) A rapid flood inundation model for hazard mapping based on least squares support vector machine regression. J Flood Risk Manag 12(S1):e12522. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12522
Bevacqua E, Maraun D, Hobæk Haff I et al (2017) Multivariate statistical modelling of compound events via pair-copula constructions: analysis of floods in Ravenna (Italy). Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 21:2701–2723. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2701-2017
Bladé E, Cea L, Corestein G et al (2014) Iber: herramienta de simulación numérica del flujo en ríos. Rev Int Métodos Numéricos para Cálculo y Diseño en Ing 30:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rimni.2012.07.004
Brunet M, Jones P (2011) Data rescue initiatives: bringing historical climate data into the 21st century. Clim Res 47:29–40. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr00960
Brunet M, Jones PD, Jourdain S et al (2014) Data sources for rescuing the rich heritage of Mediterranean historical surface climate data. Geosci Data J 1:61–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/gdj3.4
Camus P, Mendez FJ, Medina R, Cofiño AS (2011) Analysis of clustering and selection algorithms for the study of multivariate wave climate. Coast Eng 58:453–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2011.02.003
Cea L, Bermúdez M, Puertas J, et al (2016) Rapid flood inundation modelling in a coastal urban area using a surrogate model of the 2D shallow water equations. In: Proceedings of the 4th European Congress of the International Association of Hydroenvironment Engineering and Research, IAHR 2016, pp 850–855
Chang L-C, Shen H-Y, Wang Y-F et al (2010) Clustering-based hybrid inundation model for forecasting flood inundation depths. J Hydrol 385:257–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.02.028
de Almeida GAM, Bates P, Ozdemir H (2018) Modelling urban floods at submetre resolution: challenges or opportunities for flood risk management? J Flood Risk Manag 11:S855–S865. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12276
De Brabanter K, Suykens JAK, De Moor B (2013) Nonparametric Regression via StatLSSVM. J Stat Softw 55:1–21. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v055.i02
de Moel H, Jongman B, Kreibich H et al (2015) Flood risk assessments at different spatial scales. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 20:865–890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9654-z
Efstratiadis A, Dialynas YG, Kozanis S, Koutsoyiannis D (2014) A multivariate stochastic model for the generation of synthetic time series at multiple time scales reproducing long-term persistence. Environ Model Softw 62:139–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVSOFT.2014.08.017
Falter D, Schröter K, Dung NV et al (2015) Spatially coherent flood risk assessment based on long-term continuous simulation with a coupled model chain. J Hydrol 524:182–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2015.02.021
Falter D, Dung NV, Vorogushyn S et al (2016) Continuous, large-scale simulation model for flood risk assessments: proof-of-concept. J Flood Risk Manag 9:3–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12105
Fill HD, Steiner AA (2003) Estimating instantaneous peak flow from mean daily flow data. J Hydrol Eng 8:365–369. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2003)8:6(365)
García-Feal O, González-Cao J, Gómez-Gesteira M et al (2018) An accelerated tool for flood modelling based on Iber. Water 10:1459. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10101459
Hawkes PJ (2008) Joint probability analysis for estimation of extremes. J Hydraul Res 46:246–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2008.9521958
Hawkes PJ, Svensson C (2005) Joint Probability: Dependence Mapping and Bsest Practice: Technical Report on Dependence Mapping - R&D Technical Report FD2308/TR 1, DEFRA/Environment Agency
Jhong B-C, Wang J-H, Lin G-F (2017) An integrated two-stage support vector machine approach to forecast inundation maps during typhoons. J Hydrol 547:236–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.01.057
Kasiviswanathan KS, Sudheer KP (2013) Quantification of the predictive uncertainty of artificial neural network based river flow forecast models. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27:137–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-012-0600-2
Kennard RW, Stone LA (1969) Computer aided design of experiments. Technometrics 11:137. https://doi.org/10.2307/1266770
Keylock CJ (2012) A resampling method for generating synthetic hydrological time series with preservation of cross-correlative structure and higher-order properties. Water Resour Res 48:W12521. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR011923
Leonard M, Westra S, Phatak A et al (2014) A compound event framework for understanding extreme impacts. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 5:113–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.252
Lin G-F, Lin H-Y, Chou Y-C (2013) Development of a real-time regional-inundation forecasting model for the inundation warning system. J Hydroinform 15:1391–1407. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2013.202
Liu Y, Pender G (2015) A flood inundation modelling using v-support vector machine regression model. Eng Appl Artif Intell 46:223–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2015.09.014
Liu Q, Qin Y, Li G et al (2018) Fast simulation of large-scale floods based on GPU parallel computing. Water 10:589. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10050589
MARM (2011) Guía Metodológica para el Desarrollo del Sistema Nacional de Cartografía de Zonas Inundables. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino, Centro de Publicaciones, Madrid
Overpeck JT, Meehl GA, Bony S, Easterling DR (2011) Climate data challenges in the 21st century. Science 331:700–702. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197869
Pérez Gómez B (2014) Design and implementation of an operational sea level monitoring and forecasting system for the Spanish coast. University of Cantabria, Santander
Peterson TC, Manton MJ (2008) Monitoring changes in climate extremes: a tale of international collaboration. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 89:1266–1271
Petroliagkis TI, Voukouvalas E, Disperati J, Bidlot J (2016) Joint probabilities of storm surge, significant wave height and river discharge components of coastal flooding events utilising statistical dependence methodologies & techniques. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Publications Office of the European Union, Brussels
Razavi S, Tolson BA, Burn DH (2012) Review of surrogate modeling in water resources. Water Resour Res 48:W07401. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011527
Sadegh M, Moftakhari H, Gupta HV et al (2018) Multihazard Scenarios for Analysis of Compound Extreme Events. Geophys Res Lett 45:5470–5480. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL077317
Schumann GJ-P, Stampoulis D, Smith AM et al (2016) Rethinking flood hazard at the global scale. Geophys Res Lett 43:10249–10256. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gl070260
Seneviratne SI, Nicholls N, Easterling D et al (2012) Changes in climate extremes and their impacts on the natural physical environment. In: Field CB et al (eds) Intergovernmental panel on climate change special report on managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Serafin KA, Ruggiero P, Parker KA, Hill DF (2019) What’s streamflow got to do with it? A probabilistic simulation of the competing oceanographic and fluvial processes driving extreme along-river water levels. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 19:1415–1431. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-1415-2019
Serinaldi F (2015) Dismissing return periods! Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 29:1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-014-0916-1
Sopelana J, Cea L, Ruano S (2018) A continuous simulation approach for the estimation of extreme flood inundation in coastal river reaches affected by meso- and macrotides. Nat Hazards 93:1337–1358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3360-6
Storlie CB, Swiler LP, Helton JC, Sallaberry CJ (2009) Implementation and evaluation of nonparametric regression procedures for sensitivity analysis of computationally demanding models. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94:1735–1763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2009.05.007
Suykens JAK, Van Gestel T, De Brabanter J et al (2002) Least squares support vector machines. World Scientific, Singapore
Svensson C, Jones DA (2002) Dependence between extreme sea surge, river flow and precipitation in eastern Britain. Int J Climatol 22:1149–1168. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.794
Taguas EV, Ayuso JL, Pena A et al (2008) Testing the relationship between instantaneous peak flow and mean daily flow in a Mediterranean Area Southeast Spain. CATENA 75:129–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CATENA.2008.04.015
Vacondio R, Dal Palù A, Mignosa P (2014) GPU-enhanced finite volume shallow water solver for fast flood simulations. Environ Model Softw 57:60–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVSOFT.2014.02.003
Van Den Hurk B, Van Meijgaard E, De Valk P et al (2015) Analysis of a compounding surge and precipitation event in the Netherlands. Environ Res Lett 10(3):035001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/3/035001
Vapnik VN (1998) Statistical learning theory. Wiley, New York
Wahl T, Jain S, Bender J et al (2015) Increasing risk of compound flooding from storm surge and rainfall for major US cities. Nat Clim Chang 5:1093–1097. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2736
Xu Y, Huang G, Fan Y (2017) Multivariate flood risk analysis for Wei River. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 31:225–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1196-0
Xu H, Xu K, Lian J, Ma C (2019) Compound effects of rainfall and storm tides on coastal flooding risk. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 33:1249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-019-01695-x
Yaseen ZM, El-shafie A, Jaafar O et al (2015) Artificial intelligence based models for stream-flow forecasting: 2000–2015. J Hydrol 530:829–844
Zscheischler J, Westra S, van den Hurk BJJM et al (2018) Future climate risk from compound events. Nat Clim Chang 8:469–477. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0156-3
Acknowledgements
María Bermúdez gratefully acknowledges funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No. 754446 and UGR Research and Knowledge Transfer Found—Athenea3i.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bermúdez, M., Cea, L. & Sopelana, J. Quantifying the role of individual flood drivers and their correlations in flooding of coastal river reaches. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 33, 1851–1861 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-019-01733-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-019-01733-8


