Abstract
Spatially distributed nitrate reactivity was estimated for the alluvial aquifer system within the Ruamāhanga catchment in New Zealand, according to the groundwater redox status, integrating machine learning and physically based modelling approaches. Redox classification was carried out for sampled groundwater, and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was used to spatially discriminate between three redox classes across the catchment, using mappable physical parameters as predictive variables. The LDA model predictive uncertainty was used to quantify the spatially distributed geochemical uncertainty of the denitrification potential. Nitrate reduction was simulated as first order irreversible reaction using MT3DMS. Using a Monte Carlo approach, where random redox status realizations were aggregated to various model spatial discretization scales and each transport model realization was re-calibrated, we assessed the relationship between lower order nitrate reduction parameter statistics and aggregation scale. Our results indicate that both the average nitrate reduction parameter values and their standard deviations increase with increased spatial scale. This suggests that the parameters used to model denitrification as first-order reduction in geochemically heterogeneous environments, depend on the geochemical heterogeneity scale. This can have implications when knowledge gained at local scales needs to be applied for basin-scale assessment of effects. Similar were our findings with regards to the parameter-scale dependency on the model predictive uncertainty. Even though the average nitrate reduction across the model domain did not vary with redox scale, the standard deviation around the average almost doubled between the 250 and 5000 m scales.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajami NK, Gu C (2010) Complexity in microbial metabolic processes in soil nitrogen modeling: a case for model averaging. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 24(6):831–844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-010-0381-4
Bellin A, Lawrence AE, Rubin Y (2004) Models of sub-grid variability in numerical simulations of solute transport in heterogeneous porous formations: three-dimensional flow and effect of pore-scale dispersion. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 18(1):31–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-003-0164-2
Blyth J, Cetin L, Easton S (2018) Water quality modelling of the Ruamāhanga catchment—baseline model build and calibration report. Jacobs, NZ
Boso F, Tartakovsky DM (2016) The method of distributions for dispersive transport in porous media with uncertain hydraulic properties. Water Resour Res 52(6):4700–4712. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016wr018745
Broyda S, Dentz M, Tartakovsky DM (2010) Probability density functions for advective–reactive transport in radial flow. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 24(7):985–992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-010-0401-4
Burbery LF (2018) Nitrate reactivity in groundwater: a brief review of the science, practical methods of assessment, and collation of results from New Zealand field investigations. J Hydrol NZ 57(2):51–79
Close ME, Abraham P, Humphries B, Lilburne L, Cuthill T, Wilson S (2016) Predicting groundwater redox status on a regional scale using linear discriminant analysis. J Contam Hydrol 191:19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2016.04.006
Dodds WK, Jones RD (1987) Potential rates of nitrification and denitrification in an oligotrophic freshwater sediment system. Microb Ecol 14(1):91–100
Doherty J (2015) Calibration and uncertainty analysis for complex environmental models. Watermark Numerical Computing, Brisbane
Doherty J, Christensen S (2011) Use of paired simple and complex models to reduce predictive bias and quantify uncertainty. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011wr010763
Doherty J, Moore CR (2017) A theoretical analysis of model simplification. https://www.gns.cri.nz/Home/Our-Science/Environment-and-Materials/Groundwater/Research-Programmes/Smart-Aquifer-Models-for-Aquifer-Management-SAM/SAM-discussion-paper. Accessed July 2018
Fakhreddine S, Lee J, Kitanidis PK, Fendorf S, Rolle M (2016) Imaging geochemical heterogeneities using inverse reactive transport modeling: an example relevant for characterizing arsenic mobilization and distribution. Adv Water Resour 88:186–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.12.005
Fernàndez-Garcia D, Gómez-Hernández JJ (2007) Impact of upscaling on solute transport: traveltimes, scale dependence of dispersivity, and propagation of uncertainty. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005wr004727
Fiori A, Jankovic I, Dagan G (2011) The impact of local diffusion upon mass arrival of a passive solute in transport through three-dimensional highly heterogeneous aquifers. Adv Water Resour 34(12):1563–1573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.08.010
Geographx (2012) NZ 8m DEM. www.geographx.co.nz. Accessed Sept 2017
Godoy VA, Zuquette LV, Gómez-Hernández JJ (2019) Stochastic upscaling of hydrodynamic dispersion and retardation factor in a physically and chemically heterogeneous tropical soil. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 33(1):201–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-018-1624-z
Gosses M, Wöhling T (2019) Simplification error analysis for groundwater predictions with reduced order models. Adv Water Resour 125:41–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.01.006
Haas MB, Guse B, Fohrer N (2017) Assessing the impacts of Best Management Practices on nitrate pollution in an agricultural dominated lowland catchment considering environmental protection versus economic development. J Environ Manage 196:347–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.060
Hansen AL, Gunderman D, He X, Refsgaard JC (2014) Uncertainty assessment of spatially distributed nitrate reduction potential in groundwater using multiple geological realizations. J Hydrol 519:225–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.07.013
Hansen AL, Refsgaard JC, Olesen JE, Børgesen CD (2017) Potential benefits of a spatially targeted regulation based on detailed N-reduction maps to decrease N-load from agriculture in a small groundwater dominated catchment. Sci Total Environ 595:325–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.114
Hansen AL, Donnelly C, Refsgaard JC, Karlsson IB (2018) Simulation of nitrate reduction in groundwater—an upscaling approach from small catchments to the Baltic Sea basin. Adv Water Resour 111:58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.10.024
Hewitt AE (2010) New Zealand soil classification, 3rd edn. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln, p 136
Højberg AL, Hansen AL, Wachniew P, Żurek AJ, Virtanen S, Arustiene J, Strömqvist J, Rankinen K, Refsgaard JC (2017) Review and assessment of nitrate reduction in groundwater in the Baltic Sea Basin. J Hydrol Reg Stud 12:50–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.04.001
Jang E, He W, Savoy H, Dietrich P, Kolditz O, Rubin Y, Schüth C, Kalbacher T (2017) Identifying the influential aquifer heterogeneity factor on nitrate reduction processes by numerical simulation. Adv Water Resour 99:38–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.11.007
Jenks GF (1963) Generalization in statistical mapping. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 53(1):15–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1963.tb00429.x
Korom SF (1992) Natural denitrification in the saturated zone: a review. Water Resour Res 28(6):1657–1668
Li L, Peters CA, Celia MA (2006) Upscaling geochemical reaction rates using pore-scale network modeling. Adv Water Resour 29(9):1351–1370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.10.011
Lichtner PC, Tartakovsky DM (2003) Stochastic analysis of effective rate constant for heterogeneous reactions. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 17(6):419–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-003-0163-3
Lilburne LR, Hewitt AE, Webb TW (2012) Soil and informatics science combine to develop S-map: a new generation soil information system for New Zealand. Geoderma 170:232–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.11.012
McMahon PB, Chapelle FH (2008) Redox processes and water quality of selected principal aquifer systems. Groundwater 46(2):259–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2007.00385.x
Ministry for the Environment & Stats NZ (2017) New Zealand’s environmental reporting series: our fresh water 2017. ISBN: 978-0-908339-89-1 (ME 1305), p 98
Moore C, Doherty J (2005) Role of the calibration process in reducing model predictive error. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004wr003501
Moore C, Gyopari M, Toews M, Mzila D (2017) Ruamāhanga catchment groundwater modelling. GNS Science Consultancy Report 2016/162, p 189
Newsome PFJ, Wilde RH, Willoughby EJ (2008) Land resource information system spatial data layers. Data dictionary. Landcare Research unpublished report, p 74. https://lris.scinfo.org.nz/document/162-lris-data-dictionary-v3/. Accessed Sept 2017
Newsome P, Shepherd J, Pairman D (2013) Establishing New Zealand’s LUCAS land use and land use-change and forestry 2012 map landcare research report LC 1667. https://koordinates.com/layer/4316-lucas-new-zealand-land-use-map-1990-2008-2012-v011/. Accessed Sept 2017
Paleologos EK, Sarris TS (2011) Stochastic analysis of flux and head moments in a heterogeneous aquifer system. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 25(6):747–759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-011-0459-7
Perez LJ, Hidalgo JJ, Dentz M (2019) Upscaling of mixing-limited bimolecular chemical reactions in poiseuille flow. Water Resour Res 55(1):249–269. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018wr022730
Rattenbury MS, Heron DW (1997) Revised procedures and specifications for the QMAP GIS. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences, Lower Hutt
Refsgaard JC, Christensen S, Sonnenborg TO, Seifert D, Højberg AL, Troldborg L (2012) Review of strategies for handling geological uncertainty in groundwater flow and transport modeling. Adv Water Resour 36:36–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.04.006
Refsgaard JC, Auken E, Bamberg CA, Christensen BSB, Clausen T, Dalgaard E, Effersø F, Ernstsen V, Gertz F, Hansen AL, He X, Jacobsen BH, Jensen KH, Jørgensen F, Jørgensen LF, Koch J, Nilsson B, Petersen C, De Schepper G, Schamper C, Sørensen KI, Therrien R, Thirup C, Viezzoli A (2014) Nitrate reduction in geologically heterogeneous catchments—a framework for assessing the scale of predictive capability of hydrological models. Sci Total Environ 468–469:1278–1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.042
Rivett MO, Buss SR, Morgan P, Smith JWN, Bemment CD (2008) Nitrate attenuation in groundwater: a review of biogeochemical controlling processes. Water Res 42(16):4215–4232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.07.020
Rojas R, Feyen L, Batelaan O, Dassargues A (2010) On the value of conditioning data to reduce conceptual model uncertainty in groundwater modeling. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009wr008822
Saeidi R, Astudillo RF, Kolossa D (2016) Uncertain LDA: including observation uncertainties in discriminative transforms. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 38(7):1479–1488. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2481420
Sanz-Prat A, Lu C, Amos RT, Finkel M, Blowes DW, Cirpka OA (2016) Exposure-time based modeling of nonlinear reactive transport in porous media subject to physical and geochemical heterogeneity. J Contam Hydrol 192:35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2016.06.002
Sarris TS, Paleologos EK (2004) Numerical investigation of the anisotropic hydraulic conductivity behavior in heterogeneous porous media. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 18(3):188–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-003-0171-3
Sarris TS, Close M, Abraham P (2018) Using solute and heat tracers for aquifer characterization in a strongly heterogeneous alluvial aquifer. J Hydrol 558:55–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.01.032
Sarris TS, Scott DM, Close ME, Humphries B, Moore C, Burbery LF, Rajanayaka C, Barkle G, Hadfield J (2019) The effects of denitrification parameterization and potential benefits of spatially targeted regulation for the reduction of N-discharges from agriculture. J Environ Manage 247:299–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.074
Schlesinger WH, Bernhardt ES (2013) The biosphere: biogeochemical cycling on land. In: Schlesinger William H, Bernhardt Emily S (eds) Biogeochemistry, 3rd edn. Academic Press, Boston, pp 173–231
Shi L, Zeng L, Tang Y, Chen C, Yang J (2013) Uncertainty quantification of contaminant transport and risk assessment with conditional stochastic collocation method. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27(6):1453–1464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-012-0682-x
Steefel CI, DePaolo DJ, Lichtner PC (2005) Reactive transport modeling: an essential tool and a new research approach for the Earth sciences. Earth Planet Sci Lett 240(3):539–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2005.09.017
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2013) Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Education, London
Tartakovsky DM, Dentz M, Lichtner PC (2009) Probability density functions for advective-reactive transport with uncertain reaction rates. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008wr007383
Tesoriero AJ, Puckett LJ (2011) O2 reduction and denitrification rates in shallow aquifers. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011wr010471
Tesoriero AJ, Terziotti S, Abrams DB (2015) Predicting redox conditions in groundwater at a regional scale. Environ Sci Technol 49(16):9657–9664. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01869
Venturi D, Tartakovsky DM, Tartakovsky AM, Karniadakis GE (2013) Exact PDF equations and closure approximations for advective-reactive transport. J Comput Phys 243:323–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2013.03.001
Vishal V, Leung JY (2018) Statistical scale-up of 3D particle-tracking simulation for non-Fickian dispersive solute transport modeling. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 32(7):2075–2091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-017-1501-1
Watson TA, Doherty JE, Christensen S (2013) Parameter and predictive outcomes of model simplification. Water Resour Res 49(7):3952–3977. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20145
White JT, Doherty JE, Hughes JD (2014) Quantifying the predictive consequences of model error with linear subspace analysis. Water Resour Res 50(2):1152–1173. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014767
Wilson SR, Close ME, Abraham P (2018) Applying linear discriminant analysis to predict groundwater redox conditions conducive to denitrification. J Hydrol 556:611–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.11.045
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by New Zealand Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment under Contract No. C05X1508. The authors wish to acknowledge the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments that greatly improved the manuscript, and Greater Wellington Regional Council for providing data for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sarris, T.S., Close, M.E. & Moore, C. Uncertainty assessment of nitrate reduction in heterogeneous aquifers under uncertain redox conditions. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 33, 1609–1627 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-019-01715-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-019-01715-w