Assessing the restoration time of surface water and groundwater systems under groundwater pumping
- 29 Downloads
Since surface water and groundwater systems are fully coupled and integrated, increased groundwater withdrawal during drought may reduce groundwater discharges into the stream, thereby prolonging both systems’ recovery from drought. To analyze watershed response to basin-level groundwater pumping, we propose a modelling framework to understand the resiliency of surface water and groundwater systems using an integrated hydrologic model under transient pumping. The proposed framework incorporates uncertainties in initial conditions to develop robust estimates of restoration times of both surface water and groundwater and quantifies how pumping impacts state variables such as soil moisture. Groundwater pumping impacts over a watershed were also analyzed under different pumping volumes and different potential climate scenarios. Our analyses show that groundwater restoration time is more sensitive to variability in climate forcings as opposed to changes in pumping volumes. After the cessation of pumping, streamflow recovers quickly in comparison to groundwater, which has higher persistence. Pumping impacts on various hydrologic variables were also discussed. Potential for developing optimal conjunctive management plans using seasonal-to-interannual climate forecasts is also discussed.
KeywordsGroundwater pumping Streamflow depletion Restoration time Watershed resiliency
This research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant Number 1204368. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
- Alley WM (2009) Groundwater. In: Likens GE (ed) Encyclopedia of inland waters (vol 1). Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Barlow PM, Leake SA (2012) Streamflow depletion by wells—understanding and managing the effects of groundwater pumping on streamflow. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1376, p 84Google Scholar
- Daniel CC (1989) Statistical analysis relating well yield to construction practices and siting of wells in the Piedmont and Blue Ridge Provinces of North Carolina. USGPO; for sale by the books and open-file reports section, US Geological SurveyGoogle Scholar
- Draper C (2015) California’s excessive pumping during drought could permanently destroy aquifers. Glitch News. http://www.glitch.news/2015-09-15-californias-excessive-pumping-during-drought-could-permanently-destroy-aquifers.html. Retrieved on 15 May 2016.
- Fry J, Xian G, Jin S, Dewitz J, Homer C, Yang L, Barnes C, Herold N, Wickham J (2011) Completion of the 2006 national land cover database for the conterminous United States. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 77(9):858–864Google Scholar
- Garner BD, Pool DR, Tillman FD, Forbes BT (2013) Human effects on the hydrologic system of the Verde Valley, Central Arizona, 1910–2005 and 2005–2110, using a regional groundwater flow model. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2013-5029Google Scholar
- Harbaugh AW (2005) MODFLOW-2005, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model—the ground-water flow process: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, pp 6-A16Google Scholar
- Heath RC (1984) Ground-water regions of the United States. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, p 78Google Scholar
- Kenny JF, Barber NL, Hutson SS, Linsey KS, Lovelace JK, Maupin MA (2009) Estimated use of water in the United States in 2005: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1344, p 52Google Scholar
- Kumar M, Duffy CJ (2015) Exploring the role of domain partitioning on efficiency of parallel distributed hydrologic model simulations. J Hydrogeol Hydrol Eng 4(1):1–12Google Scholar
- Leake SA, Pool DR (2010) Simulated effects of groundwater pumping and artificial recharge on surface-water resources and riparian vegetation in the Verde Valley sub-basin, Central ArizonaGoogle Scholar
- Lindsey BBD, Falls WF, Ferrari MJ, Zimmerman TM, Harned DA, Sadorf EM, Chapman MJ (2006) Factors affecting occurrence and distribution of selected contaminants in ground water from selected areas in the Piedmont Aquifer System, Eastern United States, 1993–2003Google Scholar
- Lustgarten A (2015) Despite decades of accepted science, California and Arizona are still miscounting their water supplies. ProPublica. https://projects.propublica.org/killing-the-colorado/story/groundwater-drought-california-arizona-miscounting-water. Retrieved on 15 May 2016.
- Sankarasubramanian A, Sabo JL, Larson KL, Seo SB, Sinha T, Bhowmik R, Vidal AR, Kunkel K, Mahinthakumar G, Berglund EZ, Kominoski J (2017) Synthesis of public water supply use in the U.S.: spatio-temporal patterns and socio-economic controls. Earth’s Future. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016ef000511 Google Scholar
- Singh H, Sinha T, Sankarasubramanian A (2014) Impacts of near-term climate change and population growth on within-year reservoir systems. J Water Resour Plan Manag. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000474 Google Scholar
- Weaver JC (2005) The drought of 1998–2002 in North Carolina-precipitation and hydrologic conditions, U.S. Geol. Surv. Scientific Investigations Report 2005–5053, p 88Google Scholar
- Winter TC, Harvey JW, Franke OL, Alley WM (1998) Ground water and surface water: a single resource, Circular 1139, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, ColoGoogle Scholar
- Woolfenden R, Nishikawa T (2014) Simulation of groundwater and surface-water resources of the Santa Rosa Plain Watershed, Sonoma County, California. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2014-5052, p 292Google Scholar