Developing hourly intensity duration frequency curves for urban areas in India using multivariate empirical mode decomposition and scaling theory

Original Paper
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

Development of rainfall intensity–duration–frequency (IDF) curves of short duration such as hourly or sub-daily are quite essential for planning and design of urban storm water drains. However, in developing countries like India, at many places the meteorological observatories do not have long records of hourly rainfall data, at large which may have access to data at daily or higher time scale only. Therefore, the scale invariance property of rainfall and/or the disaggregation process can be a useful mean for obtaining of shorter duration rainfall IDF curves from the daily scale rainfall data. This study proposes an alternative approach for deriving the hourly and sub-daily IDF relationships by using the scale invariance property of rainfall, empirical mode decomposition (EMD) method and extreme value (EV) model formulations. The multivariate EMD method is used for decomposing the rainfall intensity series of different durations simultaneously into a number of orthogonal modes. The logarithmic plot between probability weighted moments of the orthogonal modes and the duration gives the scaling exponent, which is further used for deriving IDF relationships based on EV formulations. To validate the correctness of the proposed method, first the method is applied for rainfall data of Mumbai and Bangalore cities in India, and the results are compared with that obtained by the classical frequency factor method. The results of IDF relationships derived by the two methods displayed good agreement in general, but noticed a larger deviation for the curves of higher return periods. Then the method is applied for the derivation of IDF relationships for hourly durations from the daily rainfall data of eight major cities in Kerala State in India. The results of the study demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed approach for data-scarce regions in deriving the short duration IDF relationships from the daily rainfall data.

Keywords

IDF Scaling theory MEMD Rainfall Hydrologic analysis 

References

  1. Adarsh S, Janga Reddy M (2016) Multiscale characterization of streamflow and suspended sediment concentration data using Hilbert–Huang transform and time dependent intrinsic correlation analysis. Model Earth Syst Environ 2:199.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0254-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Afrin S, Islam MM, Rehman MM (2015) Development of IDF curve for Dhaka city based on scaling theory under future precipitation variability due to climate change. Int J Environ Res Dev 6(5):332–335Google Scholar
  3. Antico A, Schlotthauer G, Torres ME (2014) Analysis of hydro-climatic variability and trends using a novel empirical mode decomposition: application to Parana river basin. J Geophys Res Atmos 119(3):1219–1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avanzi F, De Michele C, Gabriele S, Ghezzi A, Rosso R (2015) Orographic signature on extreme precipitation of short durations. J Hydrometeorol 16(1):278–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Babu Ram, Tejwani KK, Agrawal MC, Bhusan LS (1979) Rainfall intensity duration-return period equations and nomographs of India. CSWCRTI, ICAR, DehradunGoogle Scholar
  6. Bara M, Kohnova S, Gaal L, Szolgay J, Hlavcov K (2009) Estimation of IDF curves of extreme rainfall by simple scaling in Slovakia. Contr Geophys Geod 39(3):187–206Google Scholar
  7. Burlando P, Rosso R (1996) Scaling and multiscaling models of depth-duration—frequency curves for storm precipitation. J Hydrol 187:45–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chandrarupa R, Sha U, Mujumdar PP (2015) Model and parameter uncertainty in IDF relationships under climate change. Adv Water Resour 79:127–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Greenwood JA, Landwehr JM, Matalas NC, Wallis JR (1979) Probability weighted moments: definition and relation to parameters of several distributions expressible in inverse form. Water Resour Res 15(5):1049–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gupta VK, Waymire E (1990) Multiscaling properties of spatial rainfall and river flow distributions. J Geophys Res 95:1999–2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Herath HMSM, Sarukkalige PR, Nguyen VTV (2015) Downscaling approach to develop future sub-daily IDF relations for Canberra Airport Region, Australia. Proc IAHS 369:147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hosking JRM (1986) The theory of probability weighted moments. Research Report RC 12210, IBM Research Division, Yorktown Heights, NYGoogle Scholar
  13. Hu W, Si BC (2013) Soil water prediction based on its scale-specific control using multivariate empirical mode decomposition. Geoderma 193:180–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang NE, Wu Z (2008) A review on Hilbert Huang Transform: method and its applications to geophysical studies. Rev Geophys.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2007RG000228 Google Scholar
  15. Huang NE, Shen Z, Long SR, Wu MC, Shih HH, Zheng Q, Yen NC, Tung CC, Liu HH (1998) The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proc R Soc Ser A 454:903–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang NE, Wu MCL, Long SR, Shen SSP, Qu W, Gloersen P, Fan KL (2003) A confidence limit for the empirical mode decomposition and Hilbert spectral analysis. Proc R Soc Ser A 459:2317–2345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huang Y, Schmitt FG, Lu Z, Liu Y (2009) Analysis of daily river flow fluctuations using empirical mode decomposition and arbitrary order Hilbert spectral analysis. J Hydrol 373:103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huang G, Su Y, Kareem A, Liao H (2016) Time-frequency analysis of non-stationary process based on multivariate empirical mode decomposition. J Eng Mech.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000975 Google Scholar
  19. Janga Reddy M, Adarsh S (2016) Time-frequency characterization of subdivisional scale seasonal rainfall in India using Hilbert–Huang transform. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 30(4):1063–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Koutsoyiannis D, Foufoula-Georgiu E (1993) A scaling model of storm hyetograph. Water Resour Res 29(7):2345–2361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kuai KZ, Tsai CW (2012) Identification of varying time scales in sediment transport using the Hilbert–Huang transform method. J Hydrol 420–421(2012):245–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kumar P, Guttarp P, Foufoula-Georgiu E (2004) A probability-weighted moment test to assess simple scaling. Stoch Hydrol Hydraul 8(3):173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kuo C, Gan T, Chan S (2013) Regional intensity-duration-frequency curves derived from ensemble empirical mode decomposition and scaling property. J Hydrol Eng 18(1):66–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mandelbrot BB (1974) Intermittent turbulence in self-similar cascades: divergence of high moments and dimension of the carrier. J Fluid Mech 62:331–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Menabde M, Seed A, Pegram CGS (1999) A simple scaling model for extreme rainfall. Water Resour Res 35(1):335–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mujumdar PP (2008) Lecture notes on stochastic hydrology, vol 29. IISc, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  27. Nhat LM, Tachikawa Y, Sayama, T, Takara K (2008) Estimation of sub-hourly and hourly IDF curves using scaling properties of rainfall at gauged site in Asian Pacific Region. Annuals of Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, No. 51 BGoogle Scholar
  28. Olsson J (1998) Evaluation of a scaling cascade model for temporal rainfall disaggregation. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 2:19–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Olsson J, Berndtsson R (1998) Temporal rainfall disaggregation based on scaling properties. Water Sci Technol 37(11):73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Olsson J, Burlando P (2002) Reproduction of temporal scaling by a rectangular pulses rainfall model. Hydrol Process 16:611–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rehman N, Mandic DP (2010) Multivariate empirical mode decomposition. Proc R Soc Ser A 466(2117):1291–1302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rilling G, Flandrin P, Goncalve P (2003) On empirical mode decomposition and its algorithms. IEEE-EURASIP Workshop Nonlinear Signal Image Process 3:8–11Google Scholar
  33. Shrestha A, Babel MS, Weesakul S, Vojinovic Z (2017) Developing intensity–duration–frequency (IDF) curves under climate change uncertainty: the case of Bangkok, Thailand. Water.  https://doi.org/10.3390/w9020145 Google Scholar
  34. Veneziano D, Bras RL, Niemann JD (1996) Nonlinearity and self-similarity of rainfall in time and a stochastic model. J Geophys Res 101:371–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Waymire EC, Gupta VK (1981) The mathematical structure of rainfall representation, 1, A review of stochastic rainfall models, 2, A review of the point processes theory, 3, Some applications of the point process theory to rainfall processes. Water Resour Res 17(5):1261–1294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Waymire EC, Gupta VK, Rodriguez-Iturbe I (1984) A spectral theory of rainfall intensity at the meso-β scale. Water Resour Res 20(10):1453–1465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xu Y-P, Yung Y-K (2009) Constrained scaling approach for design rainfall estimation. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23:697–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yu PS, Yang TC, Lin C-S (2004) Regional rainfall intensity formulas based on scaling property of rainfall. J Hydrol 295(1–4):108–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zope PE, Eldho TI, Jothiprakash V (2016) Development of rainfall intensity duration frequency curves for Mumbai city, India. J Water Res Protect 8:756–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology BombayMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.TKM College of EngineeringKollamIndia

Personalised recommendations