Advertisement

Advancements in hydrochemistry mapping: methods and application to groundwater arsenic and iron concentrations in Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

  • Ricardo A. Olea
  • N. Janardhana Raju
  • Juan José Egozcue
  • Vera Pawlowsky-Glahn
  • Shubhra Singh
Original Paper

Abstract

The area east of Varanasi is one of numerous places along the watershed of the Ganges River with groundwater concentrations of arsenic surpassing the maximum value of 10 parts per billion (ppb) recommended by the World Health Organization in drinking water. Here we apply geostatistics and compositional data analysis for the mapping of arsenic and iron to help in understanding the conditions leading to the occurrence of elevated level of arsenic in groundwater. The methodology allows for displaying concentrations of arsenic and iron as maps consistent with the limited information from 95 water wells across an area of approximately 210 km2; visualization of the uncertainty associated with the sampling; and summary of the findings in the form of probability maps. For thousands of years, Varanasi has been on the erosional side in a meander of the river that is free of arsenic values above 10 ppb. Maps reveal two anomalies of high arsenic concentrations on the depositional side of the valley, which has started seeing urban development. The methodology using geostatistics combined with compositional data analysis is completely general, so this study could be used as a prototype for hydrochemistry mapping in other areas.

Keywords

Ganges River Geostatistics Stochastic simulation Compositional data analysis Isometric logratio transformation Balance Geochemistry 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper completed a mandatory review and approval by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS; http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1367/) before final submission to the journal. We wish to thank Tanya Gallegos (USGS) and Josep Martín-Fernández (University of Girona) for suggestions that helped in improving the manuscript. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. N. Janardhana Raju has been supported by the Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi, under research project “SERC” (SR/S4/ES-160/2005) during 2006–2008. J.J. Egozcue and V. Pawlowsky-Glahn have been supported by the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science under projects ‘CODA-RETOS’ (Ref. MTM2015-65016-C2-1-R MINECO/FEDER.UE) and ‘COSDA’ (Ref. 2014SGR551); and by the Agència de Gestió d’Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca of the Generalitat de Catalunya.

References

  1. Acharyya SK (2005) Arsenic levels in groundwater from Quaternary alluvium in Ganga plain and the Bengal Basin, Indian Subcontinent: Insights into influence of stratigraphy. Gondwana Res 8(1):55–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aitchison J (2003) The statistical analysis of compositional data. The Blackburn Press, Caldwell, NJ (Reprint of 1986 edition plus 19 pages of new text)Google Scholar
  3. Aitchison J, Egozcue JJ (2005) Compositional data analysis: where are we and where should we be heading? Math Geol 37(7):829–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ArcGIS (2014) Mapping without limits. https://www.arcgis.com/features/
  5. Ball JW, Nordstrom DK (1992) User’s manual for WATEQ4F with revised thermodynamic database and test cases for calculating speciation of minor, trace and redox elements in natural waters. US Geological Survey Open File Report 91-183Google Scholar
  6. British Geological Survey (BGS) (2001) Arsenic contamination of groundwater in Bangladesh. Technical report, BGS, Department of Public Health Engineering (Bangladesh), Report WC/00/019, http://www.bgs.ac.uk/arsenic/Bangladesh/
  7. Caers J (2011) Modeling uncertainty in the earth sciences. Wiley-Blackwell, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chakraborti D, Mukherjee SC, Pati S, Sengupta MK, Rahman MM, Chowdhury UK, Lodh D, Chanda CR, Chakraborti AK, Basu GK (2003) Arsenic groundwater contamination in Middle Ganga Plain, Bihar, India: a future danger? Environ Health Perspect 111(9):1194–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chandana M, Enmark G, Nordborg D, Sracek O, Nath B, Nickson RT, Herbert R, Jacks G, Mukherjee A, Ramanathan AL, Choudhury R, Bhattacharya P (2015) Hydrogeochemical controls on mobilization of arsenic in groundwater of a part of Brahmaputra River flood plain, India. J Hydrol Reg Stud 4:154–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Charlet L, Chakraborty S, Appelo CAJ, Roman-Ross G, Nath B, Ansari AA, Lanson M, Chatterjee D, Mallik SB (2007) Chemodynamics of an arsenic ‘hotspot’ in a West Bengal aquifer: a field and reactive transport modeling study. Appl Geochem 22(7):1273–1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chauhan VS, Nickson RT, Chauhan D, Iyengar L, Sankararamakrishnan N (2009) Ground water geochemistry of Ballia district, Uttar Pradesh, India and mechanism of arsenic release. Chemosphere 75(1):83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chilès JP, Delfiner P (2012) Geostatistics: modeling spatial uncertainty, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken, NJCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dubrule O (1983) Two methods with different objectives: splines and kriging. J Int Assoc Math Geol 15(2):245–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Egozcue JJ (2009) Reply to “On the Harker variation diagrams;…” by J. A. Cortés. Math Geosci 41(7):829–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Egozcue JJ, Pawlowsky-Glahn V (2005) Groups of parts and their balances in compositional data analysis. Math Geol 37(7):795–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Egozcue JJ, Pawlowsky-Glahn V (2006) Simplicial geometry for compositional data. In: Buccianti A, Mateu-Figueras G, Pawlowsky-Glahn V (eds) Compositional data analysis in the geosciences: from theory to practice. Geological Society Special Publication No. 264, London, pp 145–159Google Scholar
  17. Egozcue JJ, Pawlowsky-Glahn V (2011) Basic concepts and procedures. In: Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Buccianti A (eds) Compositional data analysis: theory and applications. Wiley, Chichester, pp 12–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Egozcue JJ, Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Mateu-Figueras G, Barceló-Vidal C (2003) Isometric logratio transformations for compositional data analysis. Math Geol 35(3):279–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Emery X (2004) Testing the correctness of the sequential algorithm for simulating Gaussian random fields. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 18(6):401–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gómez-Hernández J, Journel AG (1993) Sequential Gaussian simulation of multigaussian fields. In: Soares A (ed) Geostatistics Troia’92, vol 1. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 85–94Google Scholar
  21. Greenacre M (2011) Measuring subcompositional incoherence. Math Geosci 43(6):681–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hogg RV, McKean J, Craig AT (2012) Introduction to mathematical statistics, 7th edn. Pearson Education Ltd., HarlowGoogle Scholar
  23. Isaacs EH, Srivastava RM (1989) An introduction to applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Journel AG, Huijbregts CJ (1978) Mining geostatistics. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Kayastha SL, Mohan A (2000) Varanasi: an ancient city of continuity and culture. In: Proceedings of the national symposium milestones in petrology at the end of the millennium and future perspectives, Department of Geology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, pp 20–29Google Scholar
  26. Khan AA, Nawami PC, Srivastava MC (1988) Geomorphological evolution of the area around Varanasi, UP with the aid of aerial photographs and LANDSAT imageries. Geol Surv India Rec 113:31–39Google Scholar
  27. Kumar M, Kumar P, Ramanathan AL, Bhattacharya P, Thunvik R, Singh UK, Tsujimura M, Sracek O (2010) Arsenic enrichment in groundwater in the middle Gangetic Plain of Ghazipur District in Uttar Pradesh, India. J Geochem Explor 105(3):83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kumar M, Rahman MM, Ramanathan AL, Naidu R (2016) Arsenic and other elements in drinking water and dietary components from the middle Gangetic plain of Bihar, India: health risk index. Sci Total Environ 539:125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McArthur JM, Ravenscroft P, Safiulla S, Thirlwall MF (2001) Arsenic in groundwater: testing pollution mechanism for sedimentary aquifers in Bangladesh. Water Resour Res 37(1):109–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meyzonnat G, Larocque M, Barbecot F, Pinti DL, Gagné S (2016) The potential of major ion chemistry to assess groundwater vulnerability of a regional aquifer in southern Quebec (Canada). Environ Earth Sci 75(1):article 68Google Scholar
  31. Olea RA (1999) Geostatistics for engineers and earth scientists. Kluwer Academic Publishers, NorwellCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Olea RA (2006) A six-step practical approach to semivariogram modeling. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 39(5):453–467Google Scholar
  33. Olea RA (2009) A practical primer on geostatistics: US Geological Survey, Open-File Report 2009-1103, http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1103
  34. Palarea-Albaladejo J, Martín-Fernández JA (2015) zCompositions—R package for multivariate imputation of left-censored data under a compositional approach. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 143:85–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Egozcue JJ (2016) Spatial analysis of compositional data: a historical review. J Geochem Explor 164:28–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Egozcue JJ, Lovell D (2015a) Tools for compositional data with a total. Stat Model 15(2):175–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Egozcue JJ, Olea RA, Pardo-Igúzquiza E (2015b) Cokriging of compositional balances including a dimension reduction and retrieval of original units. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 115(1):59–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Egozcue JJ, Tolosana-Delgado R (2015c) Modeling and analysis of compositional data. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  39. Pyrcz MJ, Deutsch CV (2014) Geostatistical reservoir modeling, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Raju NJ (2012) Arsenic exposure through groundwater in the middle Ganga plain in the Varanasi environs, India: a future threat. J Geol Soc India 79:302–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Remy N, Boucher A, Wu J (2009) Applied geostatistics with SGeMS—a user’s guide. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rice EW, Baird RB, Eaton AD, Clesceri LS (eds) (2012) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  43. Rivoirard J (2004) On simplifications of cokriging. In: Leuangthong O, Deutsch CV (eds) Geostatistics Banff 2004. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 195–203Google Scholar
  44. Saha D, Shukla RR (2013) Genesis of arsenic rich groundwater and the search for alternative safe aquifers in the Gangetic plain, India. Water Environ Res 85(12):2254–2264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sha ZUH, Ahmad Z (2015) Hydrochemical mapping of the Upper Thal Doab (Pakistan) using the geographical information system. Environ Earth Sci 74(3):2757–2773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shah BA (2010) Arsenic contaminated groundwater in Holocene sediments form part of middle Ganga plain, Uttar Pradesh, India. Curr Sci 98(10):1359–1365Google Scholar
  47. Shukla UK, Raju NJ (2008) Migration of the Ganga River and its implications on hydro-geological potential of Varanasi area, U.P., India. J Earth Syst Sci 117(4):489–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Singh IB (2004) Late Quaternary history of the Gangetic plain. J Geol Soc India 64:431–454Google Scholar
  49. Singh M, Singh IB, Muller G (2007) Sediment characteristics and transportation dynamics of the Ganga River. Geomorphology 86(1–2):144–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Singh S, Raju NJ, Gossel W, Wycisk P (2016) Assessment of pollution potential of leachate from the municipal solid waste disposal site and its impact on groundwater quality, Varanasi environs, India. Arab J Geosci 9(2):article 131Google Scholar
  51. Srivastava S, Sharma YK (2013) Arsenic occurrence and accumulation in soil and water of eastern districts of Uttar Pradesh, India. Environ Monit Assess 185(6):4995–5002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Srivastava P, Singh IB, Sharma M, Singhvi AK (2003) Luminescence chronometry and Late Quaternary geomorphic history of the Ganga Plain, India. Paleaogeogr Paleaoclimatol Paleaoecol 197(1–2):15–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tandon SK, Gibling MR, Sinha R, Singh V, Ghazanfari P, Dasgupta A, Jain M, Jain V (2006) Alluvial valleys of the Ganga Plains, India: timing and causes of incision. In: Dalrymple RW, Lickie DA, Tillman RW (eds) Incised valleys in time and space. Society for Sedimentary Geology (SEPM) Special Publications 85, Tulsa, pp 15–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Verly G (1993) Sequential Gaussian cosimulation: a simulation method integrating several types of information. In: Soares A (ed) Geostatistics Troia’92, vol 1. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 543–554Google Scholar
  55. Webster R, Oliver MA (2015) Basic steps in geostatistics: the variogram and kriging. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  56. World Health Organization (WHO) (2011) Arsenic in drinking water, http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/chemicals/arsenic.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.(out side the USA) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ricardo A. Olea
    • 1
  • N. Janardhana Raju
    • 2
  • Juan José Egozcue
    • 3
  • Vera Pawlowsky-Glahn
    • 4
  • Shubhra Singh
    • 5
  1. 1.U.S. Geological SurveyRestonUSA
  2. 2.School of Environmental SciencesJawaharlal Nehru UniversityNew DelhiIndia
  3. 3.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringTechnical University of CataloniaBarcelonaSpain
  4. 4.Department of Computer Sciences, Applied Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of GironaGironaSpain
  5. 5.Center for the Study of Science, Technology and PolicyBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations